Search results for query: *

Sure, but that shouldn't make any difference whether you are thin or thick. You need to choose pants that allow a holster and gun inside them. That is if you want to carry IWB/AIWB. I understand it's not for everybody and we should choose what works for us, but it isn't a weight/circumference...

One of the reasons AIWB works is because your gut is compressible. If you are sticking anything inside your pants, the fact that your gut can compress to allow space for the gun and holster usually makes it more comfortable than putting it on your hip, which unless you're carrying a whole bunch...

I had to go back and make sure it was this thread I had the link, and it was. Here is a 300 lb-er with appendix carry, and a full size Beretta 92. It's not my thing, but I suspect anybody who really wants to do it, can find a gun/holster option that will work for them regardless of their...

I get the economics from the companies standpoint, and while the Glock MOS has been around for a while and there are a lot of sight options for the Glock dovetail with the MOS, there are still some quality sight options that get eliminated due to the optics cut, such as those from Heinie and...

If you're doing a striker gun, something like the RCS Gear Vanguard 2 may be a better option https://rcsgear.com/product/vanguard-2-standard-kit/

That's my point. Why have the long sight radius gun only available as an MOS? The guns with the biggest sighting advantage without a DOT are the long sight radius guns, yet they only offer those guns as MOS. Seems dumb.

I'm not sure you remember the SIG Diamond Plate models https://www.cheaperthandirt.com/sig-sauer-220-diamond-plate-full-.45-acp-4.4-barrel-8-round-alloy-duo-tone-aluminum-night-sights/FC-798681431939.html

I'll get concerned when Glock starts offering the "Diamond Plate" models.

I'm saying with a DOT, if there isn't a sight radius advantage for accurate shooting, why is the only option for your long barreled gun the MOS option? If you're putting a DOT on a gun, there isn't an accuracy advantage to the longer sight radius gun, you could be shooting a G19/G45/etc. Edit...

Glock has determined what you really want is a G47 MOS https://us.glock.com/en/pistols/g47-mos I'm always intrigued by the typical observations that with a DOT, the sight radius doesn't matter, and why Glock only offers the Gen 5 G34/G35 with the MOS cut.

For the heavy guys

Probably not in your target price range, but there is the Roland Special https://ateiguns.com/product/roland-special/

We have this fairly recent thread with some other options https://www.thehighroad.org/index.php?threads/good-sites-for-handgun-specs-comparison-charts.929833/

HK45 is 10. https://hk-usa.com/hk-models/hk45/ USP 45 is 12 (unless you live in some limited state). https://hk-usa.com/hk-models/usp/

HK USP 45 is a 12+1 gun, which would be twice as many rounds as an S&W 329.

Is it just the trigger of the G17 holding you back, or does the extra barrel length and perhaps different balance of the PDP make a difference. I always wrestle with a possible Glock purchase, and while I recognize the G17 would probably be more versatile, and there are legions of YouTube...

A guy on another forum that spends about 1/2 of his year in Alaska flying his little private planes into remote areas went through this exercise a few years back and ended up with an HK USP 45 and uses .45 Super in the gun. He tried big revolvers, and didn't like the weight, and limited...

If you haven't picked a light, starting with the holster you like, and then determining what lights they offer holsters for is a good way to go. It beats buying some odd-ball light and then never being able to find a holster for your gun/light combo.

I don't own any Glock's, but the G34 is the one that attracts me the most.

Thanks for the clarification. If we are changing guns, you could also get a Beretta 92 with a thinner grip and a decocker that only drops the hammer to the half cock position. You'd also get to keep a full size gun and not shift to a compact gun like the PCR...