THR  

Go Back   THR > Social Situations > Legal

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old June 16, 2005, 05:56 PM   #1
Beethoven
member
 
 
Join Date: February 23, 2005
Posts: 404
Exclamation (CA) URGENT: Bill to effectively BAN HANDGUN AMMO NOW IN COMMITTEE!!!

One last chance to stop this from getting to the Governator.

SB 357 (Dunn) is a bill that would require individual serial numbers to be etched on each and every handgun bullet sold in CA, down to AND INCLUDING .22LR.


The bill PASSED from the Senate and is now in the Assembly Public Safety Committee.




MAKE PHONE CALLS, WRITE LETTERS AND SEND EMAILS AND FAXES EVEN IF YOU DO NOT LIVE IN CA. IT IS PROVEN THAT LEGISLATION SPAWNED IN THIS COMMUNIST HELLHOLE WILL SPREAD TO OTHER STATES.


CONTACT INFO FOR THE ASSEMBLY PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE: TELL THEM TO OPPOSE SB 357!!!!!!




Mark Leno, Chair Dem-13 (916) 319-2013 Assemblymember.leno@assembly.ca.gov

Jay La Suer, Vice Chair Rep-77 (916) 319-2077 Assemblymember.Lasuer@assembly.ca.gov

Rebecca Cohn Dem-24 (916) 319-2024 Assemblymember.Cohn@assembly.ca.gov

Mervyn M. Dymally Dem-52 (916) 319-2052 Assemblymember.dymally@assembly.ca.gov

Jackie Goldberg Dem-45 (916) 319-2045 Assemblymember.Goldberg@assembly.ca.gov

Todd Spitzer Rep-71 (916) 319-2071 Assemblymember.spitzer@assembly.ca.gov

Committee phone: (916) 319-3744

Committee Email public.safety@assembly.ca.gov
Beethoven is offline  
Old June 16, 2005, 06:42 PM   #2
heypete
Member
 
 
Join Date: September 12, 2004
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 967
Letters have been sent!
heypete is offline  
Old June 16, 2005, 06:45 PM   #3
Beethoven
member
 
 
Join Date: February 23, 2005
Posts: 404
Thank You!!!!!!!!
Beethoven is offline  
Old June 16, 2005, 06:46 PM   #4
dasmi
Member
 
 
Join Date: February 20, 2005
Location: CA
Posts: 2,778
Same here. I know Jay La Suer will vote against it, at least.
__________________
"You assist an evil system most effectively by obeying its orders and decrees. An evil system never deserves such allegiance. Allegiance to it means partaking of the evil. A good person will resist an evil system with his or her whole soul."
-Mahatma Gandhi
dasmi is offline  
Old June 16, 2005, 06:54 PM   #5
Guns_and_Labs
Member
 
 
Join Date: March 4, 2004
Location: Hidden Away in the East Bay, CA
Posts: 517
Letters sent, calls made, prayers for wisdom made.
Guns_and_Labs is offline  
Old June 16, 2005, 07:10 PM   #6
DigitalWarrior
Member
 
 
Join Date: April 22, 2003
Location: Nashua NH
Posts: 868
Would now be an appropriate time

to bring up the Free State Project again? Come with me to New Hampshire. together we can do good things.
__________________
Find Liberty in your Lifetime
http://www.freestateproject.org
Hope to see my fellow freedom lovers in NH.

x=0x09F911029D74E35BD84156C5635688C0
DigitalWarrior is offline  
Old June 16, 2005, 07:19 PM   #7
Gordon Fink
Member
 
 
Join Date: April 9, 2003
Location: California
Posts: 2,322
Without a doubt, Leno, Cohn, Dymally, and Goldberg will vote for the bill.

~G. Fink
__________________
“Hope is the first step on the road to disappointment.”
Gordon Fink is offline  
Old June 16, 2005, 07:24 PM   #8
cracked butt
Member
 
 
Join Date: January 3, 2003
Location: SE Wisconsin
Posts: 6,988
I don't know whether to laugh or cry. I feel for you guys in California, good luck!
cracked butt is offline  
Old June 16, 2005, 08:38 PM   #9
MrTuffPaws
Member
 
 
Join Date: October 7, 2004
Location: NorCal
Posts: 1,464
Thanks for the heads up.

Here is the letter I sent:


STOP! Just stop what you are doing, forget the do gooding, and the children, and the puppies. You need to stop and listen to me.

You are one of the last hopes that California gun owners have. You need to consider your vote on SB357 very carefully. SB357 will not prevent crime. People will still be shot, murders will still happen. Also, it is very questionable if SB357 will even help solve crime. It is just too easily defeated by anyone with premeditation.

What SB357 is though, is a tremendous burden on gun owners. I and everyone else who owns a handgun will be horribly inconvenienced and also put at legal risk. How does the saying go? “Out law unmarked ammo and only criminals will have it.” How can you let simple possession without intent become a crime?

If you want to make gun crime more punished, then please, by all means punish the criminals who commit it and not the law abiding gun owners. Use a gun in a crime? 20 years with no parole. Discharge a gun while committing a crime? 50 years with no parole. Injure, maim, or kill with a gun during a crime? Life without parole.

Punish the ones who commit the crimes; don’t give me a felony if I happen to get caught with an unmarked bullet. If I do a crime, fine, hang me if you want, but punishing me for something that I happen to have on my person, that I do not plan on committing a crime with??? Come on.
MrTuffPaws is offline  
Old June 17, 2005, 03:27 AM   #10
goalie
Member
 
 
Join Date: May 1, 2003
Location: Minnetonka, Minnesota
Posts: 1,104
It seems that California is approaching critical mass. Ammunition may end up being turned in minus the primers, powder, and case. Nobody wants a civil war, but I am afraid that a civil war/massive civil unrest is what it will take for the elected officials of California to realize that they have gone too far.

I hope it doesn't pass.
goalie is offline  
Old June 17, 2005, 04:38 AM   #11
hifi
member
 
 
Join Date: May 28, 2005
Posts: 318
They went too far a long, long time ago.
hifi is offline  
Old June 17, 2005, 12:34 PM   #12
Beethoven
member
 
 
Join Date: February 23, 2005
Posts: 404
Bump.
Beethoven is offline  
Old June 17, 2005, 01:56 PM   #13
kbheiner7
Member
 
 
Join Date: December 16, 2004
Location: Utah
Posts: 423
Quote:
It seems that California is approaching critical mass. Ammunition may end up being turned in minus the primers, powder, and case. Nobody wants a civil war, but I am afraid that a civil war/massive civil unrest is what it will take for the elected officials of California to realize that they have gone too far.
I'm afraid you are correct. Unless this leads to some serious political unrest, the 2nd Amendment as a whole will be dealt a serious blow.

It seems clear to me that the state government of California is far past the letters of concerned citizens. There are not enough of those concerned citizens to change the political climate in the state.

Jefferson once called for the blood of tyrants. While I am very afraid to see things come to that, I am more afraid of the alternative.
__________________
"Let us speak courteously, deal fairly, and keep ourselves armed and ready." -- Theodore Roosevelt

"Government is not reason, it is not eloquence, it is force; like fire, a troublesome servant and a fearful master. Never for a moment should it be left to irresponsible action." -- George Washington
kbheiner7 is offline  
Old June 17, 2005, 02:20 PM   #14
R.H. Lee
Member
 
 
Join Date: January 26, 2004
Location: CA
Posts: 7,381
blech. I really don't this this will become law, and even if it does will not result in 'civil war'. It is unenforceable on any practical level and will most assuredly result in massive civil disobedience. In other words, most California gunowners will quietly find ways to avoid compliance.
__________________
''What country can preserve its liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance?'' -Thomas Jefferson

ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΈ!
R.H. Lee is offline  
Old June 17, 2005, 02:23 PM   #15
boofus
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I'm itching for a fight. Where do I sign up? I'll crash at Skunkabilly's
 
Old June 17, 2005, 02:28 PM   #16
autospike
Member
 
 
Join Date: May 15, 2005
Location: The Heart of Dixie
Posts: 115
Bttt
autospike is offline  
Old June 17, 2005, 03:34 PM   #17
Gordon Fink
Member
 
 
Join Date: April 9, 2003
Location: California
Posts: 2,322
Quote:
Originally Posted by RileyMc
It is unenforceable on any practical level and will most assuredly result in massive civil disobedience. In other words, most California gunowners will quietly find ways to avoid compliance.
Correction: millions of armed felons will find ways to avoid compliance.

~G. Fink, who has no intention to comply
__________________
“Hope is the first step on the road to disappointment.”
Gordon Fink is offline  
Old June 19, 2005, 06:36 PM   #18
Beethoven
member
 
 
Join Date: February 23, 2005
Posts: 404
Bump.
Beethoven is offline  
Old June 19, 2005, 07:10 PM   #19
jefnvk
Member
 
 
Join Date: June 3, 2004
Location: The Copper Country, Michigan
Posts: 4,939
Riley and Fink are right. I doubt very much that this will cause a civil war.
__________________
'To discover either virtues or evils in aggregates of steel, plastics, transistors, integrated circuits, nd chemicals seems just plain wrong, a way of mystifying human artifice and of avoiding the true sources, the human sources of freedom and oppression, justice and injustice. Blaming the hardware appears even more foolish than blaming the victims when it comes to judging conditions of public life' - Langdon Winner

GIVE DETROIT TO CANADA
jefnvk is offline  
Old June 19, 2005, 08:57 PM   #20
BenW
Member
 
 
Join Date: December 24, 2002
Location: CA
Posts: 1,119
Quote:
blech. I really don't this this will become law,
Actually I have to say I'm feeling there's a better than 50/50 chance the Governor will veto SB357 (though I'm still making a stink about it to my reps).

What I'm afraid of is that he'll veto SB357 and then sign AB352 in order to show he's "working with everyone." It wouldn't be much different than what he did re: signing the 50 ban but vetoing the ammo tax.
__________________
WWCD -- What Would Curly Do?
BenW is offline  
Old June 19, 2005, 10:10 PM   #21
Can'thavenuthingood
Member
 
 
Join Date: June 1, 2004
Location: Kalifornia
Posts: 703
Practicality and enforceability have nuthin to do with it. What happens is that it becomes just another law on the books to "pile on" to whatever the original reason for LE to look at you.

It becomes another success story for the potlickers and the brady bunch.

If either one get to Arnold's desk, its a sign of our weakness.

We'll be picked off one at a time for non related issues, after all, they are just doing their job.

Amazing,

Vick
Can'thavenuthingood is offline  
Old June 19, 2005, 10:17 PM   #22
beerslurpy
member
 
 
Join Date: November 8, 2004
Location: Spring Hill, Florida
Posts: 4,440
Remember that guy who got sent to jail for having 5 tracers on his property? He was raided for being a political nuisance in SoCal, but it was the BS tracer law that got him.
beerslurpy is offline  
Old June 19, 2005, 11:37 PM   #23
Selfdfenz
Member
 
 
Join Date: January 8, 2003
Location: Small-sky country, again
Posts: 1,955
I hope for the best for you guys in Cali.
I hope common sense will prevail.

If I owned a range in Cali I would be very afraid I might just be out-of-business for want of any product to sell if this law passed.

I do know one thing. I don't live in Cali but if this passes I'll never buy another round of ammo from any manufacturer that agrees to participate in this outrage of a law by marketing ammo so marked.

S-
__________________
Selfdfenz
Selfdfenz is offline  
Old June 20, 2005, 12:41 PM   #24
Beethoven
member
 
 
Join Date: February 23, 2005
Posts: 404
Bump.
Beethoven is offline  
Old June 21, 2005, 12:56 PM   #25
Beethoven
member
 
 
Join Date: February 23, 2005
Posts: 404
Nice to see so many people care.....
Beethoven is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:38 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.