Barrel Treatments for 300 BO

Competitors also shoot incredibly high volumes through stainless steel barrels which hold up exceptionally well.

Of course, the point can also be made - chrome bores shoot worse, for longer, than stainless steel. I guess some folks would prefer it that way, for some reason?
 
Overall I’d say I’d put 1000 rounds or less through it in a year. If it were my only rifle that would be different but that isn’t the case. For my purposes, and giving a higher priority to accuracy over absolute durability, it seems like the material/coating/surface treatment doesn’t really matter. I have other questions to answer before it ever becomes an issue.
 
as far as durability goes, nitride > all else. after that my understanding is that it's all about the same. from accuracy standpoint, chrome lined is the worst. it's an old military thing to keep the barrels from pitting. it's old technology, like parkerization.

just get a nitrided barrel and be done with it.
 
Overall I’d say I’d put 1000 rounds or less through it in a year. […] For my purposes, and giving a higher priority to accuracy over absolute durability, it seems like the material/coating/surface treatment doesn’t really matter.

If you’re assessing options by accuracy > durability, then it does matter.

Prioritizing accuracy over durability 100% disqualifies chrome-lined barrels.

In broad terms, or maybe better said, “in THEORY,” nitriding hasn’t been proven to hurt accuracy in AR barrels, and even the reduced rate of fouling in nitrided barrels could potentially sustain accuracy longer between cleanings than bare steel - BUT - in practice, you will never find nitrided barrels on any competitive firing line where accuracy/precision counts. Not even on firing lines where sustaining accuracy between cleanings matters, we don’t use nitrided barrels.

Equally, keeping THEORY set aside for a moment to again acknowledge reality, I don’t know of any precision bolt action barrel maker which offers nitrided bores, and the market of nitrided barrels is really just mid-range AR barrels made for mil-spec monkeys stuck on “military FA’s are chrome lined and nitriding is more durable than steel and more accurate than chrome-lining.” But top end precision AR barrels aren’t nitrided either.

If durability is more important than accuracy, then these other coating options come into the mix, but it’s largely a coin flip, as we know civilian semi-auto AR applications, especially only 1k rounds per year, really don’t demonstrate any differentiation for any coating. But since you’re weighing accuracy over durability, and shooting a 1000rnds per year civilian SA AR application, then ditch the drakes, skip coatings, and get a quality stainless barrel from a reputable maker with the gas system, twist, and length you want.
 
Overall I’d say I’d put 1000 rounds or less through it in a year. If it were my only rifle that would be different but that isn’t the case. For my purposes, and giving a higher priority to accuracy over absolute durability, it seems like the material/coating/surface treatment doesn’t really matter. I have other questions to answer before it ever becomes an issue.

For the most part, it really doesn't matter. Of course, breathless claims warning that you won't be able to hit a darned thing with a chrome-lined barrel are just silly. Chrome-lining, for those interested in wear- and corrosion-resistance, is a viable and reasonable choice.
 
If ultimate accuracy is a concern, I think stainless from a reputable manufacturer would be the way to go, but if good accuracy is the goal with price being a concern, there are lots of options.

My latest addition is a 300 BO upper. I had an upper and bolt carrier group laying around, so I grabbed a Ballistic Advantage barrel from their "modern" line, I think it is. Nitride at $120. I have all of about 300 rounds through it so far. A mix of AAC 110gr Sabre Blade and Black Dot 110gr V-Max. With a 4X scope, it's doing about 1 to 1.5 MOA at 100. I like it. It's a blast to shoot.

I wouldn't worry too much about coatings, although I do like and prefer them. My stuff usually gets exposed to some pretty adverse conditions and a coating just makes for 1 less thing to worry about.

As far as coatings go, chromelining typically reduces accuracy, but I have several 5.56 barrels from Criterion that are chrome lined and they shoot very well. Nitride is very tough and I base that on how hard it is to dimple a Nitride barrel for a gas block. I have Criterion barrels of both the chrome lined and Nitrided variety in 5.56 and I haven't shot one out yet. These go for around $300ish.

Still, if you're looking to dip your toe, sons of liberty gunworks has a nice barrel for under $200. I'm tossing that out there because they're made by ballistic advantage to SOLGW specs and should make for a nice rig. The BA barrel I got gave me some problems in that it was way over gassed for super sonic ammo.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 481
I don't intend to build a target rifle, but if I can get a little more accuracy for a modest price increase, I won't turn it down. This will all likely be a multi-year build, what with ultimately wanting a two stamp SBR with a can. I can't shoot well enough to go all out. I've seen what match ammo does in my hands and it's not pretty.
 
In your case, if we count angels on the head of a pin, you’ll be more likely to become able to realize an accuracy advantage of a better bore quality than you would see any durability or longevity from any bore treatment.

But in reality, we don’t ever feel the weight of the angels on the head of the pin, no matter how many might be there dancing, so putting bore treatment at the forefront of the decision tree is upside down:

Don’t overthink it. Get the contour and gas length you want, from a maker with a reputation for delivering what you want from your barrel for your application.

What budget are you planning/hoping for this barrel?
 
In your case, if we count angels on the head of a pin, you’ll be more likely to become able to realize an accuracy advantage of a better bore quality than you would see any durability or longevity from any bore treatment.

But in reality, we don’t ever feel the weight of the angels on the head of the pin, no matter how many might be there dancing, so putting bore treatment at the forefront of the decision tree is upside down:



What budget are you planning/hoping for this barrel?
The couple I've been checking on are in the $150-$250 range unless I decide to just cheap out and get a whole rifle kit for $400, which would either be steel or nitrided. That will depend on how big a rush I decide to put on it. Time equals options and overall increase in quality, vs. wanting it now.
 
The couple I've been checking on are in the $150-$250 range unless I decide to just cheap out and get a whole rifle kit for $400, which would either be steel or nitrided.

This triggered me a little - I've bought hundreds of $150-250 AR barrels in my life, but man, it REALLY pisses me off to think about how $150-250 just doesn't buy the same barrels it used to buy just a few short years ago. Hell, I'm not sure you can still get a cheap Criterion for $250, let alone chambered in 300blk. But that's about the quality level I'd prefer. I've had too many Faxon barrels which just don't shoot (especially their gunner profile - which you really can't do with a pistol length gas anyway), so I don't point guys to their door, same with Odin. I haven't been knocked off of my feet by Ballistic Advantage barrels, but for their price, I don't recall ever being disappointed in how they shoot. But at that price and wanting accuracy, I'm REALLY not looking for any barrel with fluting or nitriding, nothing which increases cost in any way, and I want all of the money to be in the bore. When Shilens and Kriegers went over $400, I used a LOT of Black Hole Weaponry/True Sporting Arms barrels, but they're also out of the $250 cap - I bought a dozen Tactical Ordnance barrels (almost all have been their EV-5 poly-rifled barrels, only a few of their inexpensive, traditional cut "Pro" barrels, the EV5's DO shoot notably better and clean easier (and should last longer than conventional cut rifling), but Pro's have been sub-moa barrels for sub-$200 also). PSA's standard barrels tend to be fine, and some days, I can convince myself to take a risk on a $100 barrel, but I think it's easy to guarantee better performance with a $250+ price tag (again, not including any barrels which are increased in cost due to fluting, carbon fiber, cerakote, nitriding, etc).

In general, I do tell folks to only buy kits if it's the cheapest way into the cheapest rifle they could tolerate. It DOES happen that a guy can pin a cheap upper onto a cheap lower and end up cheaper than a complete rifle - but really only for the cheapest of cheap carbines. An option there, naturally, is to buy the cheap kit, sell the barrel and FCG, and upgrade those components. A guy can put together a REALLY cheap, REALLY small shooting AR by doing so - I've rebuilt a lot of kit rifles with better barrels, better triggers, and free-floating handguards to produce sub-MOA rifles for under $1000. That's easier to do these days since more kits are already free floating, but a little hard to swallow the fact that instead of $300 for the kit, $250 for the barrel, $180 for the trigger, and $250 for a float tube, now we don't have to buy the new handguard, but that $250 for the tube got cut in thirds and stuck into the other components because of Bidenomics... Considering a sometimes-suppressed doublestamp 300blk, I'd look long and hard at an adjustable gas block. Don't be afraid to drill a hole or mill a clearance pocket in your handguard to allow access to your adjustment screw. I use JP low-profile detent adjustable gas blocks under handguards on several of my doublestamp uppers, with the corresponding allen key stored in the stock. I prefer to nest the can on my doublestamps to give me as much room on the handguard as I can get.

Might find some good memorial day sales coming up, and if you're REALLY committed to waiting for deals, Black Friday will almost always see some good prices on barrels.
 
I have to say I've not been disappointed with PSA's barrels for the price point. I'm looking for an occasional sub-MOA barrel that is really more like 1.5 or a little more for 10 shots. My stainless AR-10 barrel from them has been beyond my expectations, meaning it's only shot over 1.5 MOA with FMJ loads using 3-4 shot groups. I'm not looking to drop a ton on the rifle, since I'm already in for $400 on stamps, but it's a one-of-a-kind thing for me, so I only have to do it once.
 
I'm looking for an occasional sub-MOA barrel that is really more like 1.5 or a little more for 10 shots.

If this defines the accuracy standard, grab up a $100 PSA and party on. Save the extra towards ammo.

And of course, the barrel only takes a half hour to change, and another upper can be swapped in a matter of seconds. BUILD IT FIRST AS A PISTOL, then it can be a pistol again by pulling the stock, a rifle by changing the upper, and an SBR by running your desired configuration. Lots of options in doing so.
 
That’s the current plan. That’s a fair level of flexibility. I figure an 8.5” barrel is sufficient for velocity with this cartridge.
 
That’s the current plan. That’s a fair level of flexibility. I figure an 8.5” barrel is sufficient for velocity with this cartridge.

8.5" in a Blackout is pretty handy. I wanna do an 8" stickshift one of these days after lusting over a "shop model" he offered a couple of years ago. Another friend bought one, and we played with it after a PRS match last year, we shot out to 600yrds with his subsonic load (big, 200grn 30cal bullets have great BC's).

I went through the era of life where every AR part I had laying around would germinate into a complete rifle, but having 50+ AR's at one point in personal inventory, enough was enough and I made a mass sell-off and consolidated down into a smaller number - these days, I'm holding on for the last few years at 9 lowers now, with around 20 uppers at any given time, always building/rebuilding and buying and selling. The majority of my lowers are stamped so I can mix and match - take a few buddies out with SBR uppers installed and blast, or out to laydown and send rounds out to long range, or anything in between, and then use a different color scheme the next time we go...
 
Back
Top