I've never met a cartridge I didn't like, but I have found some I'd never want to own.
I suppose it might be more insightful to ask people the least favorite cartridge that they actually shoot or load for. Obviously if people have zero interest or use for a cartridge they won’t use it or load for it or have any guns chambered for it. So they would by default be their least favorite.
I don’t like loading .380 but I have several pistols in that chambering so I load for it. It’s a hassle to pick the brass out of the 9mms, the components are too small to comfortably hold and handle when reloading, and I generally almost wish I didn’t have to bother with it.
I also have a .25 ACP but don’t load for it, though I do save my brass in case I ever try. Silly cartridge nowadays and if I had to give up one forever that would probably be it.
For rifle, either 8mm Mauser or .270 Winchester. I have one rifle each and haven’t tried reloading for either. Though I am saving my brass. I kinda don’t see the point of these but I’m not really a rifleman.
Shotgun: definitely .410. Silly. Wish I hadn’t bought it.
Have them. Still hate having to do it.
That brought a smile to my face, LoonWulf. Them would be "fightin' words" to my dad. Dad always was an "anything 32" type of guy, and he used to swear, "a 32 Special just kills better than a 30-30."Don't like the .32 special. Cause it was, and is, something that has no reason to exist.
My rather irrational dislike for the .30-30 is based mostly upon the EXTREME bore and muzzle wear of the ones I knew of as a youth.
Beating holy hell outa them while cleaning or neglecting them led to FAR TOO MANY riddled deer carcasses in my neck of the woods.
Old timers thought it was some kind of magic-bullet and would speak of it with absurd degrees of reverence and awe.
Todd.
No there is nothing magic about the 30-30. But its not a useless round either. It has its place. You just have to know what it is.
But I agree that the gun may be the issue more than the round. A few posters have even acknowledged that possibility pertaining to other very capable rounds....short magnums included.
I have been playing around with 35 Rem in a Marlin 336 lately. I have owned 3 different 30-30 336s and I can say the 35 cycles much smoother than any of those 30-30s. What I mean is when the rifle is loaded, it cycles rounds from the magazine and into the chamber just as smooth as if the gun were empty. Never got that with the 30-30. Did I get 3 fluke 30-30s that cycle clunky? Did I luck out and get an extraordinarily slick 35 Rem? Do all the 30-30s actually cycle just fine but only a hair less smooth than 35s and I just have an exaggerated perspective?
I was never too keen on 30-30 but I like lever actions and I really like 336 Texans so naturally 30-30 found me. I avoided the 35 Rem for awhile because of things like ammo availability. Now that I have the 35 and it feels so much nicer than the 30-30, I could do with never seeing another 30-30. To me, it is that stark of a difference.
But I agree that the gun may be the issue more than the round.
All rounds have their place given appropriate context. Sometimes their place is drumming up new firearms and ammo sales for a manufacturer.