One 9mm

Status
Not open for further replies.
Anything but a Glock. They don't call it Glock leg for no reason. In my opinion , there is not enough redundant safety with a Glock. The "safety" lever on the trigger is less than safe in my opinion especially if some foreign object gets in the trigger guard.

Glock is not the only striker fired firearm that is unsafe for carry, the S&W M&P series is no safer with their trigger.

Sorry to the Glock-o-files on the forum.

I like my H&K P30SK-V3 and P30SK-LEM triggers. But other 9mm with additional safety features make them safer for personnel self defense. One just have to practice with what they have.

It is one thing for law enforcement or military folks to have a firearm that can be at the ready quickly, I feel it is not requirement for the average civilian.

Of course, I'm one opinion and many will disagree.

Seriously? Come on, Bro! OP asked a simple question.

This is a great example of post that is every bit as wrong as the posts on a 1911 thread where some clown jumps out of line and slams 1911’s and pushes their Glock.

Question was what 9MM if only 1? Your answer of an HK P30 was fine. Your bloviating about Glocks was not High Road.
 
Last edited:
This one will do, though I'd prefer fixed sites
index.php
Please stop showing that gorgeous 639. Its torture.......:D
 
I own it...a CZ Custom SP-01, SKU 91765.

I would only swap to avoid anachronisms, and hypothetically, those would be any one of: P08 Luger, a Radom Vis 35, a Walther P38, a Browning Hi-Power, and a Beretta 1951.

I'm covered in any hypothetical alternate timeline 1908 to mid-1990s.
 
I own it...a CZ Custom SP-01, SKU 91765.

I would only swap to avoid anachronisms, and hypothetically, those would be any one of: P08 Luger, a Radom Vis 35, a Walther P38, a Browning Hi-Power, and a Beretta 1951.

I'm covered in any hypothetical alternate timeline 1908 to mid-1990s.
Honestly, my 1917 Luger has been 100% reliable and surprisingly accurate. I would feel pretty good about betting my life on it as a fighting handgun!:)
 
OK, I'll be the oddball here and pick the Sig 228 that I bought back in the 90's.

The 639 is my choice. Very nice. I am not completely familiar with all the 39 variants... So that is a 639 is it not?

My buddy had a 3906 and it was okay but I didn't like the look of the extended trigger guard.
 
The 639 is my choice. Very nice. I am not completely familiar with all the 39 variants... So that is a 639 is it not?

My buddy had a 3906 and it was okay but I didn't like the look of the extended trigger guard.
The 228 was an early compact version of the 226. It came out around 1990 and was later used by the military as the M11 I believe.
 
Either one of these SIGs. They just feel right in my hand, so I shoot them pretty well.

P320 Subcompact slide in an X-compact grip frame (since switched to Wilson Combat grip frame):
QEpYoY2.jpg

P320 AXG Classic -- Compact slide on an aluminum Carry-size grip frame. This is a catalog pic -- mine looks like this one, but with black G10 grips instead of walnut. I don't have the sight cutout on my slide, but I don't need or want it.
320axg-classic-web-left.jpg
 
Shanghai
OK, I'll be the oddball here and pick the Sig 228 that I bought back in the 90's.

Nothing oddball about your choice!

My brother had one and he let me use it while he was away on business. Loved the size and ergos on it and it was so reliable and accurate (would feed anything you could stuff into the magazine), that I used it as my dedicated range gun for trying out new handloads. I currently have a P229R as my HD gun (wanted the rail so I could mount a light), and while it's as nice and dependable as the P228 was, there was just something about the gun that felt so right when you were shooting it!
yDxwP9t.jpg
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top