Bond Arms

Seems odd to me that they have to custom fit each barrel, the bores are offset towards each other to put the rim at the firing pin. Makes it looks a little odd from the muzzle end, but the two barrels should shoot a lot closer together than centerfire barrels do. If this were purely engineered for .22LR from the ground up and came out like this, I'd say the engineer did about a 5x overkill margin on the thickness of the barrel. :)
FI_1012648.jpg
 
I appreciate him explaining the challenge with a .22 barrel, makes sense. As I really want the .38 Stinger I think I will wait for that one unless I can buy the .22 version AND the 38 barrel at the same time. Don't want to be chasing the 38 barrel for years if some snag comes along. The .22 is neat, but not a huge gain for me, so if I don't get that I think I'll be fine.
 
The order went in today so tomorrow or the next day I'll be like Ralph, the Saint Bernard on the chewey.com commercial. "the peanut butter Bond Arms box is here. The peanut butter Bond Arms box is here."
Very exciting to have a dedicated .38 Special barrel on the way. Mine is a .38/.357 but I will see how the Magnums go and then probably only do .38s after that.
 
Well I finally got the .38/.357 barrel to the range and shot only 24 rounds because I was more focused on continuing to break in my new 1911. Anyway I shot three different .38 special rounds, 105 (Cavalry), 130 (Winchester White Box), and 158 grain (Norma) and a 158 grain .357 Magnum (Cavalry). As would be expected these were progressively more recoil. The .357s were not terrible, but not something I want to shoot much if anymore. Just like the .45 Colt barrel, I prefer the 180 grain cowboy loads to the 250 grain. Really, I would be inclined to stick with the 105 grain rounds for this gun at least for range fun. This is the 105 grain:
38_105_360x.jpg

These would not be a bad choice either and I have shot these out of my revolvers:
38_poly_1_360x.jpg
 
Back
Top