So, even though SCOTUS ruled that you cannot force someone to show proper cause to receive a permit to carry they never ruled on "good moral character" or "suitability to have a permit".
"Ten states and the District of Columbia require applicants to establish that they are “suitable persons” to carry a concealed weapon before being issued a permit. Some states call this a “good moral character” requirement."
With so many other cases such as cases pertaining to age, restrictions on sensitive locations, "good moral character", assault weapons, high capacity magazines, whether or not government can make private property automatically gun free zones, red flag laws, restraining order laws, serial numbers, ghost guns, and many more there is so many cases and so few accepted by SCOTUS.
Could SCOTUS incorporate this question into an entirely different case?
Could SCOTUS rule on say an AWB & High Capacity Magazine case and in it's ruling state something like, "Per Bruen you cannot force someone to show proper cause to need a permit nor good moral character since it is a fundamental right"?
"Ten states and the District of Columbia require applicants to establish that they are “suitable persons” to carry a concealed weapon before being issued a permit. Some states call this a “good moral character” requirement."
With so many other cases such as cases pertaining to age, restrictions on sensitive locations, "good moral character", assault weapons, high capacity magazines, whether or not government can make private property automatically gun free zones, red flag laws, restraining order laws, serial numbers, ghost guns, and many more there is so many cases and so few accepted by SCOTUS.
Could SCOTUS incorporate this question into an entirely different case?
Could SCOTUS rule on say an AWB & High Capacity Magazine case and in it's ruling state something like, "Per Bruen you cannot force someone to show proper cause to need a permit nor good moral character since it is a fundamental right"?