Hoe big a majority? 51%? 80%? 90%? Would any number less than unity be sufficient for a prudent person?Posted by Officers'Wife: ....the majority of people are living life as best they can and need that helping hand from time to time.
I seriously doubt that one could substantiate that, but you sure wouldn't get on an airplane that had a 1% chance of crashing.Posted by Ryanxia: For every encounter like this, there are 100 people that actually could use some help.
That is a personal decision.Life is full of risks, I'd rather take the risk than not help someone in need.
I can certainly see dropping off some water or a blanket or both, depending upon the circumstances, and seeking help. But stopping nearby will expose one to risk.
Nether strength nor a gun will stop gunfire.Of course, having physical strength and a gun doesn't hurt.
But suppose that you do have to defend yourself and that you do so successfully. Then the question will be, who was the good guy? Your testimony might well be insufficient.
We have people responsibly advising others to not open their doors to strangers. Which is more likely to present a serious threat of violence, someone ringing the doorbell or someone stopped in a remote area on the roadside waiting for an unsuspecting good samaritan to come along?