Way more than needed for what? I use the same charge for targets that I use for hunting and I was never happy with a 90 grain charge. Anything less would have been unacceptable. If it had grouped well with 100 - 110 grains I would have used that. I killed a lot of deer with my .50 but I don't...
I hunted with a .50 Cal for 30 years with a 90 grain charge and all too often I got no exit wound and I was left tracking deer with little to no blood trail. Once I moved up to a .54 with a 90 grain charge all that ended. and I never looked back I diss the N-SSA because they don't use original...
I don't like wimpy loads either and I abhor punching paper. I don't like shooting off of a bench either. I'll shoot off a bench at paper when I sight a rifle in but once I get a load worked up for it it rarely sees paper again.
I don't like the slide mounted safety. I don't like the decocker or DA/SA. I like the Taurus 92 FS a lot better. It still has a decocker and is DA/SA but at least the safety is frame mounted and I don't have to use the DA.
I don't hate Pyrodex. I used it for many years, I just prefer black. Now if I was going hunting and didn't have anything but Goex or Pyrodex I'd use Pyrodex. Seems like a cut down cylinder would have a helluva cylinder gap.
I don't know what zhears are but a pair of medical utility scissors don't cost much and will cut anything from paper to coins and 1/4 inch thick leather.
That's a nice rifle except somebody screwed up and put the lock on the wrong side. :p What Malachi said except I'm pretty sure that barrel is going to have a round ball twist.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.