OK, to be more specific then, a person who is not properly documented has no right to keep and bear arms? Or they do have the right to keep and bear arms, just not the right to purchase the arms?
I thought the Bill of Rights pertained to inalienable human rights.
So you're allowed the...
I would like to point out that in PLYLER v. DOE, 457 U.S. 202 (1982), the following opinion was given:
Expressly stated is that a person's rights under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments are protected. Why wouldn't his/her rights under the Second Amendment be protected as well?
Would it not depend on the crime? I mean, if I'm smoking a Cuban cigar, have I forfeited my inalienable right to self-defense if one were to assault me?
Well, my comments were based upon previous comments such as:
So then a citizen who is not properly documented does not possess the...
I do not know this as fact, but I believe these kind of laws were created because many women would suffer multiple assaults over long periods of time, i.e. battered woman syndrome. I suppose this type of legislation was supposed to help a battered woman inasmuch as giving her the feeling that...
I think we will attack Iran and expand our current "war on terror" before the general election in 2008. The draft will be a reality once again.
But isn't this thread kinda OT for THR?
The only reason Fred is even hovering around without jumping into the fray, is in case "their" top lackeys, Rudolph and McCain, get knocked out for one reason or another.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.