Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
You are using the old Black Responsive theme. We have installed a new dark theme for you, called UI.X. This will work better with the new upgrade of our software. You can select it at the bottom of any page.
One "louisianaman" has well documented the considerable penetrative power of the heavy-bullet .38 S&W: http://castboolits.gunloads.com/showthread.php?t=75914
He has similar threads running on other fora, too.
Cause, I say, for a serious re-consideration of those "anemic" rounds of yesteryear.
The only desirability of a blade over a gun is it doesn't alert the whole world to where you are and what you're doing.
If there were no witnesses to my victory, would I turn myself in? Hell no. An ingrate or a fool would squander such a blessing.
If there were, then my defense has...
How to best communicate the idea of sharpening an (plain) edge?...
Imagine that you're viewing the edge of an improperly sharpened blade under 100x magnification. It looks like thousands of irregular micro-serrations, which catch and tear more than cut, and get easily worn off.
The goal is...
Call me a purist. There's nothing about those objects posing as smith and wesson firearms that I'd waste my money on. Not one nickel.
*cuddles pre-2000 revolvers*
The .38 special? Yes. A standard-pressure load, heavy wadcutter is effective enough a killer -- more effective than lighter bullet, jacketed +P loads if, according to less popular research, sheer size and depth of the permanent wound-cavity are the desirable factors for more quickly effecting...
Oh? I see.
Been hearing conflicting stories about their product for years. I decided the first step to seeking the truth myself is a discriminating inspection of their insides. This is getting very bothersome. Maybe I should quit and go buy that 40s-era detective special at the gun shop for $325.
So charter arms' site claim that their revolvers are designed with fewer moving parts, implying reliability. Curious...
Googling like crazy, can't find pics. Anyone here care to open his bulldog/etc and snap a shot?
This has been a real headache for me, so I definitely could use an answer here...
a) .357 magnum
b) 6"
c) square
d) 6 round
e) fixed front, adjustable rear
f) N1972xx
g) 28-2
About 1973
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.