vito
Member
THis change in Israelie policy might just be the first step, especially if the violence continues to escalate with more and more attacks upon Israelie civilians by Palestinian terrorists/criminals. Israel has previously tried to improve security for its citizens by widely using security officers at both governmental and private locations. The cost of this system is seenubgkt enormous, with typical restaurants and other public establishments employing armed security. Only because it is so prevalent has it not apparently caused competitive challenges to many businesses that employ such measures.
The U.S. has never taken this route, preferring to rely upon formal police forces as well as, in much of the country, allowing individual citizens to assume some responsibility for their own physical defense and well being. I wonder if the anti-gunners who keep saying that guns should only be in the hands of the police and other trained security individuals would really be happy to see civilian security guards with automatic or semi-automatic long guns standing in front of virtually every business location. And as Israel has found, even this huge security infrastructure has proved inadequate to stop individual violent terrorist attacks.
While I do not wish ill in any way upon the population of Israel, it might prove interesting if the violence escalates, Israel starts allowing widespread if not universal arming of its citizens, when would then see a marked decrease in the success of the terrorist attempts. Then some in the U.S. might say that having large numbers of concealed and open carriers is not such a bad thing, after all. Of course, the anti-gun crowd might just say "Its different here, we are not facing widespread terrorism" and bitterly cling to their faith-without-facts support of gun control.
The U.S. has never taken this route, preferring to rely upon formal police forces as well as, in much of the country, allowing individual citizens to assume some responsibility for their own physical defense and well being. I wonder if the anti-gunners who keep saying that guns should only be in the hands of the police and other trained security individuals would really be happy to see civilian security guards with automatic or semi-automatic long guns standing in front of virtually every business location. And as Israel has found, even this huge security infrastructure has proved inadequate to stop individual violent terrorist attacks.
While I do not wish ill in any way upon the population of Israel, it might prove interesting if the violence escalates, Israel starts allowing widespread if not universal arming of its citizens, when would then see a marked decrease in the success of the terrorist attempts. Then some in the U.S. might say that having large numbers of concealed and open carriers is not such a bad thing, after all. Of course, the anti-gun crowd might just say "Its different here, we are not facing widespread terrorism" and bitterly cling to their faith-without-facts support of gun control.