Rossi 92 quality: .44 mag vs .45 Colt

Status
Not open for further replies.

eldon519

Member
Joined
Jul 21, 2005
Messages
2,449
Location
Georgia
I want to preface up front, I'm not asking about the performance of .44 magnum vs .45 Colt. I reload for both so they are close enough to call it even.

Does anyone know if the dimensional control is any better for a .45 Colt vs a .44 magnum? It frequently seems that the tolerances for .45 Colt are often a bit looser than those for .44 mags such as with revolver cylinder throats, looser chambers, or bore diameters. I've also read that at least in the past, the Rossi 92s often shipped with .454" bores which would annoy me as I don't want to have to load separate ammo for my rifle vs my handguns. Do the .44 mags typically spec out how one would expect? Do the .45 Colts still have issues with looser chambers?
 
The .45's are probably going to be like any other .45Colt rifle, with somewhat generous chambers.
 
I've read up on a few forums and seen where supposedly SAAMI spec for .44 magnum in a rifle is a .431" bore vs .429" in a revolver. I've never heard that before.

I wonder if a .454 Casull might have any tighter dimensions.
 
I've read and been told that .45Colt has generous chamber dimensions due to its history as a black powder round. And since it's still used that way by some it continues to have a pretty oversize chamber to avoid sticking due to BP fouling.... At least that seems to be the excuse.

The problem occurs when we shoot a lower power load where the fouling blows back between the case and chamber and soots up the brass pretty badly. It also blows back and makes the action get fouled up sooner.

You'd likely avoid a lot of this if you go with the .44Mag option. Or possibly the .454Casull option since it's a "newer" round so it doesn't need to retain the idea of generous chamber clearance. You'd want to check to see what the chamber spec is for the .454 before you make your decision.
 
I've never checked the chamber or bore on my .45LC Rossi 92, but as to the question of having to load separate for the rifle and a handgun, my Blackhawk and Rossi 92 eat the same diet off my belt. I use slightly warmer than standard loads, but by no means near the top of the Ruger only llist, and have never had any issues with feeding, extracting or accuracy.
 
Most accurate and best functioning Rossi 92 I ever owned6 was in .44/40 caliber and really, if you're going to shoot black powder loads this is the one you need to find.
 
I don't intend to shoot any black powder. I just shoot mostly cast for the economics and am paying attention to the bore size for the sake of leading and accuracy.
 
The fit and finish and chamber on my Rossi 92 .45 Colt is much better than my "JM" Marlin 1894 .45 Colt.
The Marlin has a huge chamber and leaves lopsided brass.
The fired brass out of the Rossi will fit, unsized, into any of my .45 Colt revlovers.
The only thing I don't love about my Rossi is the iron sights.
 
I know that in a marlin the 45 has a lot of blowback around the bolt and into your face. Based on that I'd get the 44. BUT, I see a lot of 45 brass on the ground. Never see any 44.
 
I have .45 Colt Marlin Rossi and Ruger. I load more to the top of the ruger only loads. Sometimes at the top. No problems with any of them.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top