.308 load test

Status
Not open for further replies.
Me said:
If you're going to use a bushing die with out the expander button . You will need to turn your necks

Walkalong said:
It depends on the quality of the brass,

Agreed , If you are using quality brrass there should not be a problem . I don't remember what brass the OP said he's using but I've been having a problem with my Redding bushing dies and once fired LC brass . I have a detailed thread explaining this and I can't remember the title but I'f I find it I'll post a link .

I will show the issue a bit here .

The issue I've been having is the center part of the neck actually gets sized down more then the bushing size resulting in the necks having an hour glass shape

yoVIFC.jpg

The picture looks worse then it is . The bell/flare at the top is .002 so a .004 belling when you ad both sides and only happens when the expander button is not used . This seems to only happen on LC once fired cases although I do have a good size lot of LC-12-LR cases the size perfectly with out the expander .

I found the thread over at The Firing Line , As you will see if you follow the link . Redding actually confirms there Dies have this problem through E-mails with me .
http://thefiringline.com/forums/showthread.php?t=567609&highlight=redding
 
The brass I'm currently using in my rotation:

250 - Federal " FC 7.62 M1A"
500 - "LC 14"
200 - "LC 15"
200 - "Hornady .308"
100 - "FC .308"

All fired from new by me.

Now that I'm correcting for runout it will be interesting to see how much difference each makes. I had a long brass prepping weekend. Now I'll need to load some and see. I'm also anxious to run some loads that I've given up on as inconsistent and try them again with what I've learned.

For instance, I had convinced myself that my FN SPR didn't like the lighter weight bullets. Likewise, I had also ruled out Benchmark powder. So I loaded up 15 rounds of 110 VMAX with 47g of Benchmark and went to the range this morning and and shot 3 groups of 5 and they made 3 ragged holes ~0.5 MOA. I also had 15, 168 TMKs from a previous load that was so bad I was going to pull them. I corrected the run out and shot them today and same thing, all 3 groups were ~0.5 MOA. Now I'm kicking myself because I can't find the label that told me what powder I used. All I know is they chrono' at 2,680 fps with a SD of 16.
 
different brass manufacturers will have different case volumes and this will have an affect on group size. the type of brass is also different between manufacturers. some will use 70/30 brass, some will use 75/25. it all makes a difference if you want consistently small groups.

murf
 
Well I just loaded 50 after putting that O ring under the sizing die.

Checked them all and the largest runout was .0015. I'd say that's a HUGE difference.
 
The "O" ring keeps constant tension on the threads of the die and press removing any slop that may be there . This forces the die to be pressed/pushed upwards as if the case was being pushed up into the die . This causes the die have consistent pressure on all the threads at all times resulting in consistently sized cases .

In the case of a seating die It can allow the die to not be locked down hard to the press . If your press thread and your die theads are not perfectly centered with each other . When you lock the die down . It could actually be locked down at a slight cant . If your seating die does not have full body suport , that cant can force the bullet in at the same cant increasing run out . The "O" ring allows the seating die to kinda free float in the threads and self enter yet stay secure and not loosen .

That's the theory's I've heard anyways . Not sure I'm buying it though . I'd like to see if the OP turns the die down another 1/3 of a turn then seat a few more bullets . I'd like to see if it seats the same as it did with a third less turn . My thinking is the O-ring pulls the die up keeping pressure on all the threads . maybe he got lucky and the die was centered at the first setting . If he turns the die 1/3 of a turn . If the threads are off that should put the die in a cant .
 
I'm going to try the O ring on my .223 and .30-06 dies as well. Runout on those two calibers was much worse than the .308. That should give me some good data. I'm rarely lucky, and never lucky 3 times in a row
 
The nice thing about .308 in general, and the FN SPR specifically with its chrome lined barrel, is barrel longevity. FN claims 10,000 rounds. Unfortunately, I may hit that in 18 months, lol!

Gscotty, I measured shoulder setback because I had the same concern. Every case was .002-.003 from fired dimension. Very consistent.
 
Having what I consider to be a consistent load and process, I'm now working on my consistency.

I did have to switch from the Hornady 186 AMAX to the BTHP as I've run out of the former. Here's what I was getting:

3E90D934-D8BB-465B-B8F4-44427E991CD7.jpg

The thing that surprised me was the chrono data. I generally run a SD with this load somewhere in the low 20's, but check this out from the groups fired above:

1A970A4D-21C7-42FF-9C55-50B87A7B826B.png.jpg

Perhaps correcting the runout? My focus on shooting mechanics, keeping a good cheek weld and butt tight to the shoulder?

Next steps:

1. Keep practicing fundamentals
2. Load some more 168 amax with quality brass (I've got some Lapua and Nosler coming in this week)
3. Keep practicing fundamentals
 
I tried some Lapua brass for the first time in a quest to delvope a long range load (might try an F T/R competition in the future)

I made what might be the most expensive .308 load I've ever made. 168 Berger VLD, 44.0 Varget, 210m primer, OAL 2.945. Shot 2x 5 shot groups

6A48DA62-B283-4814-A229-28EC44479B2D.jpg

Here's the chrono data

39D7C9DD-7B3A-483E-8DC1-53FDAE6EE005.jpg

My plan is to take this to the 500 yard lane and see how it performs
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top