Here is why I do that, because most people don't want to do the research, many don't have a Tutor for a build and many don't have time or patience, but they have money.Is this normal? Recommending to go out and buy $4k worth of gear right out of the gate for a AR newbie?
I don't see how anybody wouldn't just say to bite the bullet and build one. Buying a complete gun seems to always turn into buying different parts later that would have been bought in the first place if built right the first time.
I guess I didn't thoroughly understand that answer but I guess see this decision is like most any other hobby, it's either time or money you can spend.Here is why I do that....you're not doing that with a Frankengun.
I guess I didn't thoroughly understand that answer but I guess see this decision is like most any other hobby, it's either time or money you can spend.
I have the time and wanted to save some money so that's why I gravitated towards the AR build.
I just didn't see a type of gun like an AR that is lego-like for somebody who doesn't want to put any time into the gun.
That seems like if it's out of box and slap on optic scenario then more of a FS2000, AUG, Tavor, SCAR is the type of gun to buy.
^^^This^^^The standard base Colt AR-15 looks good and the price is right.
As long as it is already assembled and ready to go out of the box. I won't be tinkering with it.The S&W M&P Sport would be a good choice, you can get them for around $650 in my parts.
Spend the extra money and buy the Colt.As long as it is already assembled and ready to go out of the box. I won't be tinkering with it.
This is not a good idea, if you do the research you will see why, but, it's your gun and your money.
WHAT DID You pay for that DD? Which model?Although I own others, my most accurate ARs are a Daniel Defense and a Barnes Precision. With quality ammunition, either is ~.5 MOA. They come built to shoot with Giselle triggers etc.
The DD is in 6.8 which is an AR with better legs.
For builders, personally, as it shoots .223 or 5.56 with little change if any in accuracy, I recommend a Wylde chamber.
Are you referring to some actual, legit, shooting exercise that compares the two, or just reading what people write on gun forums?
There is about a $400 price difference between the M&P Sport II and the Colt 6920. There is not a $400 performance difference between the two, so that money could go a long way at either making you a more capable shooter, or owning a more capable rifle.
Quote:
This is not a good idea, if you do the research you will see why, but, it's your gun and your money.
Are you referring to some actual, legit, shooting exercise that compares the two, or just reading what people write on gun forums?
Quote:
Are you referring to some actual, legit, shooting exercise that compares the two, or just reading what people write on gun forums?
Here comes the AR15.com spreadsheet...
So basically all the stuff you read online.
Once again, show me a shooting exercise that applies to the civilian shooter, where the Colt does something that the Sport can't. I've never seen it. And I've only been shooting competitively for several years, finish in the top third of most multi-gun competitions, win some occasionally, help run a local chapter of a shooting organization, direct matches, and have about 20k rounds downrange through my three ARs.
Some of us have moved beyond what has been said online, or never really bought into it in the first place. To people who shoot, actual results are more important than a spec sheet.