Noz
Member
My Evil Twin (J-Bar) uses equal parts vegetable shortening/beeswax for an over the ball lube. I use felt wads soaked in whatever bullet lube I am using on my rifle bullets under the ball. Both work and neither of us is going to change. He likes his guns to run "juicy" and I don't.
Chain fires or multiple discharges: NO they don't always come from the cap end of the chamber. I have had 5 multiple discharges using 1860 Army pistols. Most were, while I was in a learning mode, caused by poor choice of bullet alloy in which the too hard ball did not seal the chamber and neither wad nor lube was in use. Others were unknown.
In every case, the ball to the left of the chamber under the hammer went a fraction of a second after the one under the hammer. No other chambers fired. In two cases the extra ball did in fact hit the target. The only indication of anything amiss on the gun was a very slight lead smear on the side of the barrel.
In EVERY case the cap on the unintended chamber was unfired and in place after the discharge.
I have been using the ROAs for over a year and have had no problems with it. I continue to use the lubed wad under the ball.
Chain fires or multiple discharges: NO they don't always come from the cap end of the chamber. I have had 5 multiple discharges using 1860 Army pistols. Most were, while I was in a learning mode, caused by poor choice of bullet alloy in which the too hard ball did not seal the chamber and neither wad nor lube was in use. Others were unknown.
In every case, the ball to the left of the chamber under the hammer went a fraction of a second after the one under the hammer. No other chambers fired. In two cases the extra ball did in fact hit the target. The only indication of anything amiss on the gun was a very slight lead smear on the side of the barrel.
In EVERY case the cap on the unintended chamber was unfired and in place after the discharge.
I have been using the ROAs for over a year and have had no problems with it. I continue to use the lubed wad under the ball.