lysanderxiii
Member
Well, if the "shot-placement-is-all-that-matters" crowd is right, then .22LR is perfectly adequate.
I have my doubts.
I have my doubts.
lysanderxii said:Well, if the "shot-placement-is-all-that-matters" crowd is right, then .22LR is perfectly adequate.
I have my doubts.
During the assassination attempt on president Reagan 3 people were put on the ground with a 22LR revolver. A press secretary, a cop and a SS agent. None of them got up. Brady never fully recovered.
Now I'm not advocating a 22 for SD in the home, but when people say it isn't effective you need to watch this video. Proof that it works pretty well.
So generally the thought is that 38 Special or 380 ACP is the absolute minimum for defense. I get that and understand why.
However, some shooters do not shoot these calibers well, especially in the firearms most typically associated with them. Small frame revolvers in 38 Special are notoriously difficult for shooters with limited experience to shoot well, and the recoil even from 38 Special is difficult for shooters with little experience to shoot well. Same is true for small frame semi-autos.
I would propose that a Ruger or Browning semi auto 22 LR might be as good a choice as any for home defense for people with limited shooting experience, are recoil sensitive, and do not have hours (or the interest) in significant training. These pistols are relatively accurate (I would say more so than most small frame revolvers and autos), controls are easy to manipulate, recoil is essentially nothing, and in my experience are reliable. The 10 round magazine has twice the capacity of a J frame, and nearly twice as much as most small semi autos in 380 or 9mm.
The 22 LR is no doubt a poor stopper, but I would rather see a few hits on a target with a 22 than five misses with a J frame.
But as I have said before. most disasters happen because people PLAN to have disasters. If all you have is a .22 when the chips are down, it's because you PLANNED to have nothing but a .22.Sure, there are other choices. If a .22 is what you have, that's what you have. As Jeff Quinn says, "People don't like having extra holes in them."
I just came back from the range today, commenting to my friend about how fast I threw 10 head shots with my Mark II Ruger Target Competition rapidLy at 7 yards. I also did 5 neck shots from 25yards. If you can fire it fast and accurately enough at a moving target, though, you’d be deadly.
I would venture to say, I’d prefer a 22 Magnum over an LR. RECOIL isn’t much more and it’s more potent.
Even better would be a 22 LR rifle with a 20-30 round magazine. A longer barrel with a high capacity would be easily lethal.
But as I have said before. most disasters happen because people PLAN to have disasters. If all you have is a .22 when the chips are down, it's because you PLANNED to have nothing but a .22.
Well heck then, something like a Ruger Charger with a laser sight and a 50 round mag would be ideal.
..though most breakins are likely from drug addicts high on drugs.
Even better would be a 22 LR rifle with a 20-30 round magazine. A longer barrel with a high capacity would be easily lethal.
Once again, there's something pathological going on with .22lr on this forum. It's like people are trying to find any and all excuse to do something they know is a bad idea, and, because they do know it's a bad idea, they're looking for someone to help them rationalize it.
I totally get that not everyone can handle the recoil from a snubnose .38 or a micro .380, but there are soooo many other options, especially when we're talking about home defense. How about a full size .357 magnum with light .38 loads???
Or a full size 9mm 1911. Can't pull back the slide? Well, first of all, reloads in a self defense shooting are almost unheard of, but if you're really worried about it get a slide pull device.
And why are we limited to a pistol? We've got pump action .410 shotguns (loaded with slugs of course), pistol caliber carbines, and, wait for it, AR15s...which have almost zero recoil and many that come in under 6 lbs!
I'm just at a complete loss here. A .22 pistol is only a good idea if you ignore literally every other valid option.
Arrrgh. My mistake speaking of revolvers in the auto loader section.
From my hands on time with my friend's Keltec PMR30, I'd like something like that when the time comes.
Then those are conditions that caused you to make that plan. But since I'm 50% disabled with arthritis, I find it hard to believe very many people are limited to a .22 by arthritis.What if I'm elderly and have arthritis in my hands and just frankly can't shoot anything else?
If .22lr was the only thing I could defend myself with, and I was forced to use it, I would be sure to load it with solid point, 40 grain, with the hottest load possible. I think Winchester X makes a decent one. CCI also makes one, too.