Explosion inside ballistics gel??

Status
Not open for further replies.

BigBore44

Member
Joined
Feb 11, 2013
Messages
4,265
Location
Oklahoma
I was perusing youtube last night looking for new videos of people with guns and stumbled upon this video.

Of course the video teaser pic has girls on it as most videos on YouTube do. But at the 30 second mark or so it shows a S&W (44 mag most likely) discharging. Then shows a bullet going into and through homemade “ballistics” gel. As the bullet exits the gel, the cavity in the gel collapses. But when the gel fully collapses, there appears to be a secondary explosion inside the gel and then smoke exiting rearward (from where the bullet entered). I’ve NEVER seen this before.

Anybody have any idea what could cause this? I watched this portion of the video several times. I’m no chemist but I’m very intrigued. I wouldn’t think gel wouldn’t have enough elasticity and density to create enough compression to cause a detonation. And what gasses left from the bullet traveling through the gel could cause that? Of course I don’t know what the gel was made of. But I wouldn’t think the gel would have a flammable composition.

What do you guys/gals think?
 
Last edited:
The explosion is the collapse of the cavitation bubble created by the bullet going into the gel. This happens very fast and if you were there next to the gel, you would hear a pop or snap sound as it occurs. When the bubble collapses, it generates heat, purportedly 8000 degrees or so, hotter than the sun, but only for a split second which is an implosion. This is all called sonoluminescence.
 
This is all called sonoluminescence.

Nope, sorry, it's not sonoluminescence.

If you read up on sonoluminescence (even the Wikipedia article will do) you'll find that the energy level necessary is a couple orders of magnitude greater than you could expect in gel behind a bullet at conventional velocity. Further, the most energetic sonoluminescence created to date is barely visible to the human eye.

What you observe is a much more mundane phenomena: dieseling. The vacuum created in the expanding cavity causes some of the gel to vaporize. The compression of the collapsing cavity causes adiabatic heating of the vapor past its flash point, and it combusts. This is essentially the same process as adiabatic combustion in a diesel engine.

I’ve NEVER seen this before.
. . .
But I wouldn’t think the gel would have a flammable composition.

Most high quality/high speed video of bullets over 3000ish fps will show this. The best example is Jerry Miculek's 460 Mag videos.

Ballistic gel is made of collagen. Like all organic matter, it can be oxidized, and pretty easily once it's atomized or vaporized.
 
Last edited:
Nope, sorry, it's not sonoluminescence.

If you read up on sonoluminescence (even the Wikipedia article will do) you'll find that the energy level necessary is a couple orders of magnitude greater than you could expect in gel behind a bullet at conventional velocity. Further, the most energetic sonoluminescence created to date is barely visible to the human eye.

What you observe is a much more mundane phenomena: dieseling. The vacuum created in the expanding cavity causes some of the gel to vaporize. The compression of the collapsing cavity causes adiabatic heating of the vapor past its flash point, and it combusts. This is essentially the same process as adiabatic combustion in a diesel engine.



Most high quality/high speed video of bullets over 3000ish fps will show this. The best example is Jerry Miculek's 460 Mag videos.

Ballistic gel is made of collagen. Like all organic matter, it can be oxidized, and pretty easily once it's atomized or vaporized.
Very interesting. Thanks guys.
 
I was perusing youtube last night looking for new videos of people with guns and stumbled upon this video.

Of course the video teaser pic has girls on it as most videos on YouTube do. But at the 30 second mark or so it shows a S&W (44 mag most likely) discharging. Then shows a bullet going into and through homemade “ballistics” gel. As the bullet exits the gel, the cavity in the gel collapses. But when the gel fully collapses, there appears to be a secondary explosion inside the gel and then smoke exiting rearward (from where the bullet entered). I’ve NEVER seen this before.

Anybody have any idea what could cause this? I watched this portion of the video several times. I’m no chemist but I’m very intrigued. I wouldn’t think gel wouldn’t have enough elasticity and density to create enough compression to cause a detonation. And what gasses left from the bullet traveling through the gel could cause that? Of course I don’t know what the gel was made of. But I wouldn’t think the gel would have a flammable composition.

What do you guys/gals think?


I am sure that someone must’ve asked this before, but how do people have so many full auto firearms that were clearly made after 1986?
 
Nope, sorry, it's not sonoluminescence.

If you read up on sonoluminescence (even the Wikipedia article will do) you'll find that the energy level necessary is a couple orders of magnitude greater than you could expect in gel behind a bullet at conventional velocity. Further, the most energetic sonoluminescence created to date is barely visible to the human eye.

So much energy, in fact, that it can be produced by a very tiny pistol shrimp in the ocean.
 
And I noticed in the OP video that after the smoke puffs out, there is some visible black stuff (carbon?) in the cavity.

I learn new stuff every time I get on THR, which rocks.
 
I am sure that someone must’ve asked this before, but how do people have so many full auto firearms that were clearly made after 1986?

By getting an FFL then paying whatever other special occupation taxes they need. Not an expert on which taxes they need to get paid for regular firearms vs nfa.

Most of the people you see in these types of videos are small gun store owners, their friends/family, or people they are renting to.
 
I may have to apologize for my ignorance.........
but in that video those people seem to be just blasting away without aiming or controlling the gun. (BangBangBangBangBangBang)
Wouldn't it be more fun to aim carefully and shoot one shot at a time and look to see if you have even hit the target? (Bang, Oops I missed)
Another thought that I had - I like looking at girls too, but when I am shooting a gun I try to keep my mind being accurate and safe.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top