"Gimmicky" optics?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Here is a interesting post I did a while back about the Unique Air Rifle "IZH"MDL 60 and 61. The 177 pellet rifle had almost a cult like following. The accuracy was better than guns costing 10 times as much. It had a 6 way adjustment trigger.Air Rifle enthusiast were even entering them in matches. And crazy as it may be, the gun was under $150.00. And guys were spending three or 4 times that amount for scopes. I knew where one guy, had a $450.00 custom stock made for it.
One of my most favorite times shooting has been what I call "Wind Shooting". I would wait until a day with a light breeze that would move the leaves of a tree, just enough to keep them moving. And then after taking a very long time, wait for the precise moment and squeeze the trigger. It required more skill than you can imagine. And a lot of Patience.
I have always boosted about the gun. But never really got into the scope I used. Well my choice was always the UTG Bug Buster. Small and compact, fit this little gun so well. The Clarity on this gun was fantastic. And you really needed that clarity to pick up the slender vein in the moving leaf. The target was about 20-25 yds. We did a lot of shooting with that gun. Another game was to place a target down range and smear with honey. We would then shoot fly's that landed.

Here is a picture I took abou 5 years ago. And guess what? That Bug Buster is as good as the day I bought it.

UsrdBjP.jpg

nQeXdWi.jpg

Here is one riding on my Beeman R7. Made by Weihrauch. This particular rifle was loaned to Tom at Vortek, to develop the Well known and fantastic Vortek Spring kit.

X6GxtMB.jpg

Here is a pic of the Henry with the Bug Buster and my Marlin with a Nikon Pro Staff.
If you look closely the Bug Buster is sitting above a Skinner Peep sight.
RSaezDq.jpg
 
I think those older bugbusters are actually better than the newer one I used.
I wish I still had my qb78 sporters, and old bugbusters that we're on them. Newest one I tried got sent back.
My current heavy qb repeater has an Intensity 4-12x44 on it. I considered a center point, utg, and another simmons scope that were on the rack at Walmart, and ended up buying the used intensity to get better optics for the the same 40 bucks or so.
 
Lol, yep, all those gimmicky Manufactuers that make illuminated optics, Like Bushnell,Vortex,CVlife, Trijicon, Primary Arms Leopold, UTG, Nikon and on and on. Gee, I hate actually being able to see the reticle in low light. I just like to point and shoot the with a scoop.

I haven't seen anyone say illuminated reticles were a gimmick. But 36 color options come at a price, as do different reticle options. No $50 red & green reflex sight can hold a candle to an RMR in durability, reliability, repeatability or battery life. Again, for a range toy, eh, no biggy. For something that needs to work when I need it, hard pass.

Just don't confuse cheap with quality and cost. Nothing cheap about the quality of the UTG.

Yes there is. I've already covered some of it, but another column where cheap scopes come up short is adjustment repeatability. Sorry, but unless you happen to find some kind of blowout liquidation, you don't get a good scope for $80. You get something that's a bit better than a $40 scope.

came with a Bushnell, but decided to go with a UTG. And it was Not because of cost.

Unless we're talking about Elite series, saying "I chose UTG over Bushnell" doesn't exactly demonstrate that you're a discerning optics buyer. Most Bushnell scopes aren't very good, especially the ones that come on budget rifles at Walmart.

. The UTG are not low cost, just lower cost than scopes in same class.

Again, yes, they are. $80 is a cheap optic. Honestly, twice that is still a cheap optic.

And just have never seen that much of a difference to pay more. Most of the differerences have alway been just opinion or subjective. This debate has been going on for years. If you think a gun that cost more is better, that is fine. I will stick to what I have used and trusted for years.

Back to not being discerning. If you can't tell the difference between your $80 bug buster and a Leupold VX-III, nothing I can say will help you.

The "does it cost more because it's better or is it better because it costs more?" argument is loaded with fallacies from both the snobby crowd and the cheapskates. A more accurate platitude is "you don't always get what you pay for, but you never get what you don't pay for."

Yes they have thicker croshairs, but that can actually be a benefit. When in the swamp I am NOT shooting 100 yards to a target.When going into the swamp, I make sure to go with the Bug Buster. Why the place is about as harsh a environment as you will see. Muddy, fog, wetness, etc. The Bug will hold up every time. Solid as a Rock.As I mentioned,

Unless you're shooting squirrels in the eyeball to make stew, there's not much reason to use any magnified optic inside 100 yards. But yeah, even a cheap POS with a wandering zero isn't gonna seem that bad at such close range. I own a number of cheap optics. Most of them are either on equally cheap rimfire guns or collecting dust. UTG, NCStar, Simmons, BSA, etc.

Here is a interesting post I did a while back about the Unique Air Rifle "IZH"MDL 60 and 61. The 177 pellet rifle had almost a cult like following. The accuracy was better than guns costing 10 times as much. It had a 6 way adjustment trigger.Air Rifle enthusiast were even entering them in matches. And crazy as it may be, the gun was under $150.00. [/ATTACH]

You seem to have convinced yourself that cheap stuff works just as well as much more expensive quality stuff. Any for some people, it does. These are also the people who buy & fill their tool box at Harbor-Freight and then carry on about how MAtco & Snap-On are overpriced junk, no better than their $20 Taiwanese wrench set. Or rave about how their $70 Costco tire is every bit as good as the $200 Goodyear or Firestone.

Guess what? They're not. It ain't a matter of opinion, it's a fact. The cheap stuff may be good enough for some uses, some people, but the equal of premium products it isn't.

I'm as cheap as the next guy, always like to get the best value I can for my money that I work 80 hour weeks running two businesses for whilst raising 4 kids. I buy a lot of used and NOS, especially machine tooling. The 13" Yamakawa 4 jaw chuck on my big lathe is a $1,200 chuck. I just happened to get it for $350. That's something to gloat about. But bragging up the $150 Shars 5" 3 jaw I stuck on my mini lathe as being just as good as the $650 Bison or Buck I couldn't justify for the machine's purpose would be asinine.
 
I haven't seen anyone say illuminated reticles were a gimmick. But 36 color options come at a price, as do different reticle options. No $50 red & green reflex sight can hold a candle to an RMR in durability, reliability, repeatability or battery life. Again, for a range toy, eh, no biggy. For something that needs to work when I need it, hard pass.



Yes there is. I've already covered some of it, but another column where cheap scopes come up short is adjustment repeatability. Sorry, but unless you happen to find some kind of blowout liquidation, you don't get a good scope for $80. You get something that's a bit better than a $40 scope.



Unless we're talking about Elite series, saying "I chose UTG over Bushnell" doesn't exactly demonstrate that you're a discerning optics buyer. Most Bushnell scopes aren't very good, especially the ones that come on budget rifles at Walmart.



Again, yes, they are. $80 is a cheap optic. Honestly, twice that is still a cheap optic.



Back to not being discerning. If you can't tell the difference between your $80 bug buster and a Leupold VX-III, nothing I can say will help you.

The "does it cost more because it's better or is it better because it costs more?" argument is loaded with fallacies from both the snobby crowd and the cheapskates. A more accurate platitude is "you don't always get what you pay for, but you never get what you don't pay for."



Unless you're shooting squirrels in the eyeball to make stew, there's not much reason to use any magnified optic inside 100 yards. But yeah, even a cheap POS with a wandering zero isn't gonna seem that bad at such close range. I own a number of cheap optics. Most of them are either on equally cheap rimfire guns or collecting dust. UTG, NCStar, Simmons, BSA, etc.



You seem to have convinced yourself that cheap stuff works just as well as much more expensive quality stuff. Any for some people, it does. These are also the people who buy & fill their tool box at Harbor-Freight and then carry on about how MAtco & Snap-On are overpriced junk, no better than their $20 Taiwanese wrench set. Or rave about how their $70 Costco tire is every bit as good as the $200 Goodyear or Firestone.

Guess what? They're not. It ain't a matter of opinion, it's a fact. The cheap stuff may be good enough for some uses, some people, but the equal of premium products it isn't.

I'm as cheap as the next guy, always like to get the best value I can for my money that I work 80 hour weeks running two businesses for whilst raising 4 kids. I buy a lot of used and NOS, especially machine tooling. The 13" Yamakawa 4 jaw chuck on my big lathe is a $1,200 chuck. I just happened to get it for $350. That's something to gloat about. But bragging up the $150 Shars 5" 3 jaw I stuck on my mini lathe as being just as good as the $650 Bison or Buck I couldn't justify for the machine's purpose would be asinine.

Oh for Christ sake lol. No I do not need you to tell me the difference between a Leopold or a UTG. You are throwing around a whole lot of pure Pompous BS. Lol, and I buy Micheline tires Big Guy. I have ownd a Leopold as well as other higher end scopes, In fact I mentioned a few that I do own. I do not buy from Harbor freight,(not that there is anything wrong with that) I think Bushnell scopes suck at least at the lower end. Have had only one in my lifetime, a Bushness Banner. Do not ever remember how I came across it, or even where it is.I believe it came with a cheap air gun I bought for my son when he was young. Sorry, not as great as your are at shooting Squirrels at 100 yds. Don't even think I have shot one that far off or want to. But then I am not as great a shot as you. Gee, must be nice to have such great eyes that you do not even need a scope at 100 yds. Part of your greatness I presume.

I could care less about your chuck or your lathe. I think NCStar, Simmons and BSA are cheap scopes, and never once said anything about them. Actually have never owned one, So I will not run my mouth about them. Look, you do not like UTG, fine, so do not buy one. I never buy cheap, I seldom buy high end. I usually look for quality at a reasonable price. And yes I even wear a Timex watch. Have had the same for more years than I can remember. Have swam with it in the Ocean, ran with it, fished with and it has taken a beating. I thought I would throw that in, so you can tell us all how we are so much lower than yourself. And Please do not go off on what great watch you have. Not really interested.

And,By the way, Your comment toward the IZH that I have convinced myself that cheap stuff works, shows that you know nothing about Air rifles any more than you do scopes. I am sure that is the first you ever saw or heard of a IZH MDL 60. If you had, you would not have made such a ignorant statement. Might actually take the time to learn about them before making a judgement. That statement alone said a whole lot about your knowledge of anything.. Yes I am big into Airguns. And I buy quality. Have not bought one in years that was under $600. . But I am sure you know more about them than I do.

The OP started this by saying Illuminated scopes were Gimmicky. I responded they were not, many manufactures make them including Leopold etc. And I said UTG is a nice scope for the money and it is. It is a nice budget scope. And I said it is very rugged and it is! !! !!! I proved that by owning them. You started off with a lot of BS about how they fall apart in every way etc. Sorry Big Guy, that was a complete untruth, total BS, nonsense.
No Mr. Consumer reports, it is not to be compared to high end scopes. And not one person here needs your to explain the difference.Most of the posters here have been using scopes since we were kids. None of us need a class from you.If there is a newbie or beginner that wants to lean about scopes, I know of a lot better sources than yourself to go to.

Sounds like you like you are the one bragging about yourself. Some need to tell us all about your Machine skills, your gun smith skills, your lathes, your consumer buying greatness etc? Don't care about how many kids you have, how many jobs you have or your erudition of other folks that do not buy as smart as you do. At least I do not hear them bragging about themselves.
Man, thank God, I did not say I bought something from Harbor Freight. I feel sorry for anyone that has, knowing how your would come out of the work work to tell them about your great tools and how stupid they are.

By the way, Mr. Consumer Reports, Never heard of a Costco tire. Maybe you could tell us all about them and give a class on what tire to buy. Hope you don't mind if I pass.

How about we just move on? I am already tired about talking about scopes, don't really care about what you think of the UTG etc. The OP was simply talking about reticles being illuminated. You want to talk about Reticles, There are pages upon pages that can fill books about them. Go for it!
This has gone on long enough. I suggest if you want to continue to just pm me rather than continuing this here. I get the point, you do not have any use for the UGH, that is fine. (And please refrain from cheesy expressions like ("Discerning buyer")

Also while we are at it, here is another Baikal Mdl.46. Made by the same company that made the little rifle above. And I bet you know more about this gun than I do. Yea, it is another cheap gun. Would run about $6-$700 if you could even find one. And yes, touted as good a gun costing 3 times as much. I won't get into the accuracy. I sure you would just bash it anyway.

PcpOXQC.jpg
 
Last edited:
Do you always get twisted and engage in personal attacks when someone tells you the cheap stuff you bought is cheap stuff?


You should at least try to be consistent with your drivel:

Have you actually used the scope mentioned above? Or any UGH. What Bushnell are you talking about? I have a few Bushnells, and I have UGH scopes. I have a feeling you really do not know much about UGH scopes.

I think Bushnell scopes suck at least at the lower end. Have had only one in my lifetime, a Bushness Banner.
 
What colors a person can see is very interesting. Why do some folks like a Red Fiber Optic over a Green, or even Orange or yellow. It was not until recently that I learned deer are not color blind. Maybe not a good idea to wear blue jeans when hunting. And speaking of color blind, what color can a person with colorblindness see?
Are there any colors that human beings can not see?
"Then there is "color blindness", which does not affect all human beings (so again, whether the answer is yes or no depends on what exactly your question is aimed at). The most well known kind of "color blindness" is red-green deficiency, which occurs, in case of Northern European ancestry, in about 8 percent of males and 0.5 percent of females (Deeb, S.S.; Clin. Genet. 67, 369377 (2005).). This is a genetic condition which individuals can have to a greater or lesser degree. In the extreme case, red and green (of similar brightness) look the same to these people, and may even appear as gray. For a person with normal vision, this is not so easy to imagine and to help with the design of images that work for all people, some graphics software offers color blindness proofing filters that simulate what an image will look like to individuals with color blindness and allow to adjust the image to make it universally accessible (for an example see, e.g., Adobe Photoshop accessibility overview at"



http://scienceline.ucsb.edu/getkey.php?key=2460

BtGrE58.jpg

UX3hSXU.jpg
 
Last edited:
Sorry it didn't cost $500 but it was good enough to hunt with.

All in all, I think that's what it comes down to is is it good enough for the purpose for that person. I won't fault anyone who has one and likes it.

Some people would probably look down on the Bushnell, Mueller, and Primary Arms scopes that I have on my rifles, but they do the job and I like them. For several reasons that have been mentioned in this thread, I probably wouldn't recommend a UTG for purchase but if someone gets one (or more) and is happy, awesome.
 
All in all, I think that's what it comes down to is is it good enough for the purpose for that person. I won't fault anyone who has one and likes it.

Some people would probably look down on the Bushnell, Mueller, and Primary Arms scopes that I have on my rifles, but they do the job and I like them. For several reasons that have been mentioned in this thread, I probably wouldn't recommend a UTG for purchase but if someone gets one (or more) and is happy, awesome.

Yes sir. Something I thought about today was this scope weighs two pounds, and that's not a joke. Two pounds. lol
 
Mine weighs 13.9 ounces, and love it. Another light scope really nice light scope is my Clearidge. About 11oz.

https://rifleopticsworld.com/review-leapers-utg-bug-buster/

https://www.chuckhawks.com/clearidge_ultraRM_3-9x32.htm

http://www.squirrelhuntingjournal.com/clearidge-ultra-rm-3-9x32ao/

http://www.clearidgeoptics.com/

Recently Purchased a MP AR15 22, thinking about putting one of my Bug Busters on it, but maybe the Clearidge. My last scope purchase was a Nikon Pro staff EFR, but just too big for my taste. Nice scope though.
 
Last edited:
Leatherwood “CAMputer”, is my #1 so far. Not a bad idea just a poor execution. It was such a fail I wouldn’t even try the Shepherd scopes for years, then a buddy loaned me one of his and I was an instant fan. Even better if you have one rifle that you shoot with two different loads.

Really surprised that no one else has done a dual and independent scope, seems like there are more and more people that talk about sub and super loads for a few calibers and what really made me a believer was the one shot zero.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top