rpenmanparker
Member
- Joined
- Mar 6, 2018
- Messages
- 2,456
After you read this, you will either believe me and thank me or think I'm nuts and revile me. So let's begin:
I have been working to improve the fit of my 12 ga sporting clays gun. That means talking to you folks on the forum and doing a lot of reading online, some of the material recommended by you all. Most talk about shotgun fit involves a listing of the major dimensions/measurements of the gun, length of pull, drop at heel and comb, and cast. And there is a lot of talk about how these measurements affect the fit of the gun. What is rarely discussed is what does fit mean. What is a good fit?
And that is where things get really squirrely. Suppose you look at pictures in these articles and videos. What do you see? Everything under the sun. No two people, even the experts, are mounting their gun the same way. No names are needed. One guy with one of those really funky British speech impediments has the comb down below his bottom teeth, and he is supposed to be an expert. Another guy has it between his two rows and teeth. Another guy has it in his cheek pocket above his teeth and below his eyes. Same for the shoulder pocket, whatever that is. Left to right, up or down, no two folks have the butt of the stock in the same place. Don't even start on length of pull.
Yet many people think their gun fits well because such and such a company makes their guns to fit normal American men and, of course, everyone wants to think they are normal.
But if you read enough, you start to see some principles that really do allow a fit based on a person's physical data. Thing is those principles and what fitters really do bear no relation to each other as far as I can tell. If they did, everyone would be walking around with guns that look like mine does now:
Here are the basic principles as near as I can tell: nose about 1-2 inches behind the thumb, butt in the shoulder pocket, comb firmly in the cheek pocket just below the eye socket orbital bone, and one more thing that is the key to it all, THE HEAD PERFECTLY ERECT. This last thing is what shotgun fitting should be all about according to the most authoritative writings, but for most people never is. For the best vision, what shotgunning is all about, vision, the head should be neither turned nor tilted at all. Neither from side to side, nor front to back. Not leaning over the gun, not forward onto the comb. This keeps the eyes level horizontally, centered in the eye sockets, and pointed straight ahead. If you violate any of these, then you are looking with one eye above the other, the eyes rolled up high or far to the left or right. Not good. Well, damn, that changes everything with regard to fit.
Here is my personal example. Too bad I am too lazy to draw a diagram. My gun had originally LOP of 14 3/4", drop at heel of 2 3/8", drop at comb of 1 1/2", and cast off of about 1/4". As a lefty I first had the stock bent in reverse to change the cast to about 1/4" on or in the other direction.
Now my important base measurements not with a gun mounted, which are not all that weird: 6 inches from top of my shoulder to the center of my eyeball vertically and 3 1/2 inches horizontally. My cheek pocket is 1 1/2 inches below my eyeball center and 3/4" to the left. So the top of my shoulder is 4 1/2" below my cheek pocket and 2 3/4" to the left.
First the good news. When the comb is firmly in my cheek pocket, the rib is at the perfect height for my eyes. So I don't need an adjustable comb or modified-height rib. It all goes downhill from there. Assuming just for simplicity that the heel should end up right at the top of the shoulder, I have a 3 5/8" discrepancy between the drop at heel of the gun and my anatomical drop from eye to top of shoulder. That is huge, but not really unusual. Supposing your discrepancy is 2 inches or 5. It is still a problem. My eye is 3 1/2 inches to the right of where I will mount the stock. Who is it that thinks these guns were made to fit normal Americans.
Admittedly the shooting position with your shooting arm and shoulder raised up and toward your face and your torso twisted somewhat in relation to the direction the barrel points collapses some of these discrepancies quite a bit and brings your shoulder pocket closer to your cheek pocket both horizontally and vertically. Let’s say with the gun mounted your shoulder pocket is 2 inches higher and 1 inch closer to your face. But no where near all the way needed. Hence my crazy looking adjustable butt plate. With the butt just about at the top of my shoulder and twisted toward my cheek, I can obey the erect head rule and still have the rib right down the center of my eye. My friend tells me it can't be right. He doesn't have to do that, and I am not deformed. How can it be? Well, that is what happens when you try to follow the erect head rule.
And don't get me started about the gun being canted toward my face. That is driving people crazy. They all "know" that you must keep the gun straight up and down. No canting allowed...unless you want it to fit.
By the way, since installing the adjustable butt plate, my scores have gone up from about 25% to about 50%. Jus' sayin'.
So this all raises one question. If the erect head is really important, why don't everyones' guns look like mine? And it could be worse. You could also need to adjust the comb and/or rib height. Another interesting question is if you did this with a custom stock, what would it look like? Can you get enough lift, enough cast? Would a bespoke gun maker force you to adopt the preferred erect head position when measuring you for your new gun, or would he build the gun to how you always have mounted one and call it a fit? I grew up in the men's custom clothing business, so I know how that kind of thing works. Tailors don't tell their customers to stand up straight and put their shoulders back if that isn't how they naturally stand. What good would that do? The clothes wouldn't fit when the customer relaxed into their natural postures. But shouldn’t a fitter attempt to educate the customer about the best gun mounting form?
Interesting, no?
I have been working to improve the fit of my 12 ga sporting clays gun. That means talking to you folks on the forum and doing a lot of reading online, some of the material recommended by you all. Most talk about shotgun fit involves a listing of the major dimensions/measurements of the gun, length of pull, drop at heel and comb, and cast. And there is a lot of talk about how these measurements affect the fit of the gun. What is rarely discussed is what does fit mean. What is a good fit?
And that is where things get really squirrely. Suppose you look at pictures in these articles and videos. What do you see? Everything under the sun. No two people, even the experts, are mounting their gun the same way. No names are needed. One guy with one of those really funky British speech impediments has the comb down below his bottom teeth, and he is supposed to be an expert. Another guy has it between his two rows and teeth. Another guy has it in his cheek pocket above his teeth and below his eyes. Same for the shoulder pocket, whatever that is. Left to right, up or down, no two folks have the butt of the stock in the same place. Don't even start on length of pull.
Yet many people think their gun fits well because such and such a company makes their guns to fit normal American men and, of course, everyone wants to think they are normal.
But if you read enough, you start to see some principles that really do allow a fit based on a person's physical data. Thing is those principles and what fitters really do bear no relation to each other as far as I can tell. If they did, everyone would be walking around with guns that look like mine does now:
Here are the basic principles as near as I can tell: nose about 1-2 inches behind the thumb, butt in the shoulder pocket, comb firmly in the cheek pocket just below the eye socket orbital bone, and one more thing that is the key to it all, THE HEAD PERFECTLY ERECT. This last thing is what shotgun fitting should be all about according to the most authoritative writings, but for most people never is. For the best vision, what shotgunning is all about, vision, the head should be neither turned nor tilted at all. Neither from side to side, nor front to back. Not leaning over the gun, not forward onto the comb. This keeps the eyes level horizontally, centered in the eye sockets, and pointed straight ahead. If you violate any of these, then you are looking with one eye above the other, the eyes rolled up high or far to the left or right. Not good. Well, damn, that changes everything with regard to fit.
Here is my personal example. Too bad I am too lazy to draw a diagram. My gun had originally LOP of 14 3/4", drop at heel of 2 3/8", drop at comb of 1 1/2", and cast off of about 1/4". As a lefty I first had the stock bent in reverse to change the cast to about 1/4" on or in the other direction.
Now my important base measurements not with a gun mounted, which are not all that weird: 6 inches from top of my shoulder to the center of my eyeball vertically and 3 1/2 inches horizontally. My cheek pocket is 1 1/2 inches below my eyeball center and 3/4" to the left. So the top of my shoulder is 4 1/2" below my cheek pocket and 2 3/4" to the left.
First the good news. When the comb is firmly in my cheek pocket, the rib is at the perfect height for my eyes. So I don't need an adjustable comb or modified-height rib. It all goes downhill from there. Assuming just for simplicity that the heel should end up right at the top of the shoulder, I have a 3 5/8" discrepancy between the drop at heel of the gun and my anatomical drop from eye to top of shoulder. That is huge, but not really unusual. Supposing your discrepancy is 2 inches or 5. It is still a problem. My eye is 3 1/2 inches to the right of where I will mount the stock. Who is it that thinks these guns were made to fit normal Americans.
Admittedly the shooting position with your shooting arm and shoulder raised up and toward your face and your torso twisted somewhat in relation to the direction the barrel points collapses some of these discrepancies quite a bit and brings your shoulder pocket closer to your cheek pocket both horizontally and vertically. Let’s say with the gun mounted your shoulder pocket is 2 inches higher and 1 inch closer to your face. But no where near all the way needed. Hence my crazy looking adjustable butt plate. With the butt just about at the top of my shoulder and twisted toward my cheek, I can obey the erect head rule and still have the rib right down the center of my eye. My friend tells me it can't be right. He doesn't have to do that, and I am not deformed. How can it be? Well, that is what happens when you try to follow the erect head rule.
And don't get me started about the gun being canted toward my face. That is driving people crazy. They all "know" that you must keep the gun straight up and down. No canting allowed...unless you want it to fit.
By the way, since installing the adjustable butt plate, my scores have gone up from about 25% to about 50%. Jus' sayin'.
So this all raises one question. If the erect head is really important, why don't everyones' guns look like mine? And it could be worse. You could also need to adjust the comb and/or rib height. Another interesting question is if you did this with a custom stock, what would it look like? Can you get enough lift, enough cast? Would a bespoke gun maker force you to adopt the preferred erect head position when measuring you for your new gun, or would he build the gun to how you always have mounted one and call it a fit? I grew up in the men's custom clothing business, so I know how that kind of thing works. Tailors don't tell their customers to stand up straight and put their shoulders back if that isn't how they naturally stand. What good would that do? The clothes wouldn't fit when the customer relaxed into their natural postures. But shouldn’t a fitter attempt to educate the customer about the best gun mounting form?
Interesting, no?
Last edited: