Refute common anti gun talking points

Status
Not open for further replies.
What do immigrants and healthcare have to do with firearm owner ship. It's a major strategic screw up to get issues mixed up. Look at what's going on out there in the country,

I was just dreaming that with affordable healthcare I would be truly free ie I would not have to be career military or tied to my job. For example, it would be nice to open up my own business. Those immigrants mostly come from countries with no tradition of private gun ownership. If they become US citizens they will have no problem voting for gun grabbing politicians.
 
Those immigrants mostly come from countries with no tradition of private gun ownership. If they become US citizens they will have no problem voting for gun grabbing politicians.

Major screw up. Look at the numbers in the country. How many independent moderates would be driven away? When did these immigrants get to be voting citizens? What makes you think Doc's don't have an opinion of gun violence.

One of the people I shoot with is a respected local physician. He had thousands of dollars worth of high end handguns last time out. He has seen much gun violence. He also thinks POTUS[ mainly related to health care issues] should have been impeached yesterday. I would be a good thing not to overgeneralize these groups. In refuting this polarized thinking is going to get you turned into road kill.
 
Last edited:
What if Juergen Stroop told the Jews of Warsaw that they were being "resettled to the east"?
Using analogies back fires. The other side can use an analogies. In the end the discussion is on will we get radiation poisoning from our microwaves. It's hard to stay on task. Most of the anti people I know did not ride up on a turnip truck.

Addendum: Dropping an A bombs on the border to control migration. would win tons of converts. Right?
 
Last edited:
Using analogies back fires. The other side can use an analogies. End the end the discussion is on will we get radiation poisoning from our microwaves. It's hard to stay on task. Most of the anti people I know did not ride up on a turnip truck.
Analogies bedevil the other side. That's why they and their fifth columnists don't want gun owners using them.

Of course facts bedevil them as well. They're even more opposed to facts.
 
What do immigrants and healthcare have to do with firearm owner ship. It's a major strategic screw up to get issues mixed up. Look at what's going on out there in the country,

It ties together because other issues that people are concerned about may make them vote one way or the other. Some people out there may generally support gun rights but may support some restrictions because gun rights is not their number one issue. I can tell you that based what I have read on a political forum I go to that has all sorts of people left , right and center many would be democratic party voters are dismayed at the current state of the democratic party saying they have gone too far left for their tastes especially now that all the candidates are proposing free healthcare for illegal immigrants.

We will see but this means that many would be Democratic party voters might not vote or may vote other thus preventing a pro gun control president from taking office.
 
Major screw up. Look at the numbers in the country. How many independent moderates would be driven away? When did these immigrants get to be voting citizens? What makes you think Doc's don't have an opinion of gun violence.

One of the people I shoot with is a respected local physician. He had thousands of dollars worth of high end handguns last time out. He has seen much gun violence. He also thinks POTUS should have been impeached yesterday. I would be a good thing not to overgeneralize these groups. In refuting this polarized thinking is going to get you turned into road kill.
Once again, you have proven a lack of political or historical understanding. The medical profession is not largely pro gun, and have been weaponized against us. And the idea of YOU talking about over generalization after saying you wanted to "persecute" the leadership of the NRA and screaming about orange jump suits shows that you are uniquely ignorant of a great many things. You wrap yourself as self appointed wise man, but are completely ignorant of the political dynamic that lead us here.

Right now the Democrat Party is importing a new underclass to become voters. It is their stated goal. The idea is that since they cannot replace ideas, they want to replace people. How many moderates would be driven away? They either are for or against gun rights, if we have to become anti gun ourselves to woo them, then their support is pointless. Your doctor shooting buddy is irrelevant. The plural of "anecdote" is still not "facts."

Frankly, for all of your snark, you can't seem to form a coherent argument, and seem to have learned debate and political theory from watching Yosemite Sam cartoons.
 
Odd. I've watched every one and while I have seen Sterling SMG's, MG42's, MG15's and a certtain C96, I have never seen any AR-15 or M16 variant in any of the Star Wars movies.

Do you think that the gun grabbers know any of that? To them any gun that is black and scary is an AR-15. Those idiots cannot tell the difference between an AR-15 and a Glock.
 
What would happen if the anti-gun forces offered a compromise. Put the assault firearms under the NFA with a small fee.

What happens if this strict constructionist court decided that the 2A was a collective right not an individual right. That is, each state has the right to regulate firearms based on the history of the amendment.

Also, take hard to look at the attitude about health care and immigration in the entire country. Maybe, it would be wise to focus on gun control only. The Blue Dogs are coming back. It's a screw up to make that huge over-generalization about Democrats.

What would your definition of 'assault firearms' be ?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top