Have we discussed the new double barrel .22 WMR pistol?

Status
Not open for further replies.
I have seen a thread or two on it here.
Would like to shoot one as well but don't want one.
 
Interesting concept and a pair of 22 magnums in the chest would definitely leave a mark. I just wouldnt want to be the consumer QC tester
 
Interesting concept, and 4 x two rounds of .22 Mag should be quite effective as a last ditch measure... I'd see this as a backup gun.

But that trigger non-guard... I'm deeply skeptical. Looks like a coat hanger waiting to snag something. It would give problems in a pocket, and IWB.
 
Meh, in order to reliably set off two Rim fire rounds at once the hammer spring is going to be HEAVY, which is why you need a two finger trigger.
22 mag ballistics from this short of barrel isn't gonna be as impressive 40gr @ 1100 maybe 1200 fps and it's gonna be flashy and loud.
Imma be a hard pass.
 
Would like to shoot one for sure but it takes two fingers (recommended) on the trigger to operate.

The vid I saw required 2 fingers and demonstrated that pulling either the top half or bottom half individually won't operate the trigger.
 
It is not. Two separate barrels, just like every other two shot curiosity. Two (or more) shots fired from one barrel, such as the M16A2's 3 shot burst fire mode, is burst fire. Theoretically, a modernized version of the mitrialleuse would be legal per ATF regs. (currently) The Metalstorm would be considered burst fire because more than one projectile comes for each barrel during firing.
 
Yes...there is a thread in the Revolver forum. It's an interesting looking piece. I'd like to shoot one...though I don't care for the open trigger guard.
 
No idea why they wouldn’t put a full trigger guard on this gun.
If they did, the grip would be exceptionally long. The trigger pull is probably very heavy anyway, so long as it's in a holster that covers the trigger, it's not going off.
 
All I hear in regards to Standard Manufacturing is that their quality is extremely high (as are their prices.) I don't think a company with Standards reputation is relying on "gimmicks" to sell this, I don't think the company CEO is the type of guy to invest in something that has no meaningful use or market.

The company has been clear on what the intended use is for this gun: close quarters self defense. At 7 yards or less, with Speer or Hornady short barrel JHP ammo, I can see this being an effective gun with recoil around that of a .32 S&W Long.

For who this gun is geared towards (novice females, elderly) it's a simple, inexpensive, and effective option. The one thing I'm pleased to see is a .22 Mag snub revolver that holds more than 6 rounds and isn't made by Taurus.
 
Interesting concept. After reviewing the video and reading the article I really couldn’t see myself buying one but I can see where something like this could be handy for some folks.

I just can’t get my head around firing with two fingers. I would think that pulling a heavy trigger with two fingers would affect stability.
 
InRangeTV did a video on this, from ShotShow this year. Ian and Karl were both rather impressed, and Ian wants one for a curiosity. As a few other people have said, this is one of those guns designed for non-gun people who want a self-defense weapon, and for people who have limited hand strength. Other than for those who enjoy curiosities - I'd like to get one for the novelty of it - it's not a gun for gun-people. But that's OK, because it might allow more people, who otherwise wouldn't get a gun even though they want to have one for defense, to have one and protect themselves.
 
The vid I saw required 2 fingers and demonstrated that pulling either the top half or bottom half individually won't operate the trigger.
.
and for people who have limited hand strength.
There's nothing mechanical preventing you from pulling the trigger with just one finger on the top half other than a lack of leverage. I'm guessing (from experience with other Rim fire DA revolvers) that the pull measured at the top finger section is north of 20#.
I'm not sure this is exactly a good choice for limited hand strength.
 
I feel better armed with a Pepperbox.

"The first thing we did on that glad evening that landed us at St. Joseph was to hunt up the stage-office, and pay a hundred and fifty dollars apiece for tickets per overland coach to Carson City, Nevada.,, I was armed to the teeth with a pitiful little Smith & Wesson's seven-shooter, which carried a ball like a homoeopathic pill, and it took the whole seven to make a dose for an adult. But I thought it was grand. It appeared to me to be a dangerous weapon. It only had one fault—you could not hit anything with it. One of our "conductors" practiced awhile on a cow with it, and as long as she stood still and behaved herself she was safe; but as soon as she went to moving about, and he got to shooting at other things, she came to grief...Mr. George Bemis was dismally formidable. George Bemis was our fellow-traveler. We had never seen him before. He wore in his belt an old original "Allen" revolver, such as irreverent people called a "pepper-box." Simply drawing the trigger back, cocked and fired the pistol. As the trigger came back, the hammer would begin to rise and the barrel to turn over, and presently down would drop the hammer, and away would speed the ball. To aim along the turning barrel and hit the thing aimed at was a feat which was probably never done with an "Allen" in the world. But George's was a reliable weapon, nevertheless, because, as one of the stage-drivers afterward said, "If she didn't get what she went after, she would fetch something else." And so she did. She went after a deuce of spades nailed against a tree, once, and fetched a mule standing about thirty yards to the left of it. Bemis did not want the mule; but the owner came out with a double-barreled shotgun and persuaded him to buy it, anyhow. It was a cheerful weapon—the "Allen." Sometimes all its six barrels would go off at once, and then there was no safe place in all the region round about, but behind it."

Mark Twain "Roughing It."
 
Only question I have is how do they guarantee that the ignition is simultaneous. Tests run years ago attempting to fire both barrels from a shotgun showed two patterns quite some distance apart. I think it was Keith. Here, maybe the distance is expected to be in single digit feet so it might not matter.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top