300 Win Mag glass

Status
Not open for further replies.
Clarification:: I will be doing long range shooting at paper on a range. I will also be hunting with it. But not long range shoots on game!!! Just wanted to clarify that
 
Clarification:: I will be doing long range shooting at paper on a range. I will also be hunting with it. But not long range shoots on game!!! Just wanted to clarify that

How long is long? And what game?

In general, I like a 4-16x44mm scope for hunting. It’s just enough to get out to 1,000yrds for me without an excessively large target, and to take game where I need to. I have a few SigSauer Tango4’s I enjoy, although I have seen two of them fail at rifle matches. Mine have been flawless so far.
 
Last edited:
Unless you're going to be doing a lot of shooting at 1000+ there isn't anything special needed, a high quality 3-9X40 or similar is going to be the most scope for the dollar. The only thing I'd suggest is to make sure it is a scope with a good reputation for durability. In sporter weight rifles 300 WM can be a scope killer. For hunting something with good light transmission for those shots at first and last legal shooting times is a good idea. But don't fall into the trap of thinking you need a HUGE front objective. A 40mm objective set on 8X or less will let in all the light most human eyes can use. Going to a 50mm lens lets you go up to 10X, but anything above 10X will be less than optimal in low light. Above that and you need to be taking shots in bright daylight.

For hunting I like the simplicity of scopes with multiple aiming points for longer ranges. You still need to practice shooting at longer ranges with them, but once you figure out where you impact in relation to the aiming point it makes hits on big game targets much easier. Your impact point may not be EXACTLY where you're aiming at longer ranges, but you'll be within a few inches, close enough to hit the kill zone on any big game animal. And if you do need to compensate with hold over/under it will only be a few inches instead of a few feet.

For target shooting something with dials is more precise. They can be used for hunting, but it takes time to get them dialed in. Time you may not have when hunting. Out to 300 yards none of the common cartridges shooting pointed bullets drops enough to need more than a couple of inches of holdover anyway. If you're not planning on shooting game past 300 then it doesn't matter.

A price range would help narrow suggestions. You can get by with a lot of $200 scopes just fine. But you can spend $2000+.
 
Two scopes in QD mounts.
3-9 for hunting
Straight 20x (does anybody still make fixed power) for target.
Assuming you are tough enough to hump a target rifle in the woods or get kicked by a hunting rifle on the range.
I'm not, my FTR weighs nearly double my sporter.
 
I put a 2-12x42 with Firedot Leupold VX-6 on my 7 Mag

I've got that scope on a .270 with the CDS Dial and FireDot BDC reticle, very nice rig. I'm in the process of "tweaking" a REM 700 in .300WM that I've had for years, and done little with. Currently it's got a Leupold VX3 4.5-14 on it. It's going to get replaced with either another VX6HD 3-18x44 or a VX5HD 3-15. Really leaning towards the VX6HD because I like the dual dials VS just elevation.

OP IF Your primary deal is targets out to 1000 chances are good you're going to want a MIL or MOA reticle with external adjustable turrets. I've also got a Vortex PST 4-16X with Mil reticle that works well out to 1000 and beyond. Stand hunting would be fine, but I'm not a fan of carrying a rifle with large external turrets.
 
A 40mm objective set on 8X or less will let in all the light most human eyes can use. Going to a 50mm lens lets you go up to 10X, but anything above 10X will be less than optimal in low light. Above that and you need to be taking shots in bright daylight.

A guy has to have some TERRIBLE eyes before they can only go to a 5mm exit pupil. Most humans start losing light between 2-3mm exit pupil, meaning a 40mm objective is good for about 12x and a 50mm won’t go dark until 20x. Even aged eyes don’t typically have issue below 5mm, as the muscles which fatigue with age are what OPENS the pupil, not close it - so we get better with age, in that regard (might not be able to see diddly squat, but we can still capture light in a scope).

I personally start losing light at about 2.3-2.4mm exit pupil. No darkening in a 4.5-18x44mm which is a 2.44mm exit pupil, no darkening at all in a 3.5-21x50mm which yields 2.38mm, and only slight darkening at 22x in a 6-24x50mm at 2.27mm.
 
Is there a use for the current crop of wide range variable scopes? I was reading of a 4.5-30X.
I don't want anything less than 20 on a target scope and nothing over maybe 12 on a hunting rifle, and a plains rifle at that.
 
Is there a use for the current crop of wide range variable scopes? I was reading of a 4.5-30X.
I don't want anything less than 20 on a target scope and nothing over maybe 12 on a hunting rifle, and a plains rifle at that.

I use such scopes, regularly. I’ve been running 3.5-21x, 4.5-30x, 7-35x, and 4.5-27x on my match rifles. We might engage targets at 250yrds, or out to 1400yrds. Might have to jump from porthole to porthole 10 times in a minute and a half, or might dive on our bellies and bang a long range troop line.

Fantastic for coyote hunting as well, since I have properties where I might not be able to see past 50 yards, or might drive around a 4 square mile section where shooting 800yrds at a coyote can almost be expected.

ETA: wide range isn’t so new. Bushnell was selling a 4.5-30x like 15-20yrs ago, and the Nightforce 5.5-22x is at least 12yrs old. Might be “recent” in terms of history of the world, but there have been 5-6 factored scopes for a long time now, not just 3-4 factored scopes.
 
Last edited:
Is there a use for the current crop of wide range variable scopes? I was reading of a 4.5-30X.
I don't want anything less than 20 on a target scope and nothing over maybe 12 on a hunting rifle, and a plains rifle at that.

8-35x is the optimal range for me. NF 7-35x is a great option (if a bit pricey) I like the magnification at the top end for range work, and the key is, at 8-10x, a well-thought-out reticle is still usable. With scopes like S&B 5-25x and vortex 3.5-27x, the promise of fast ACOG 4x like target acquisition is appealing for movers and close up big game etc where you don't want to see solid brown in your entire FOV, but in reality I never dialed below 8x because finding the reticle slows me down too much. YMMV

I would love a 3-30 type scope, but only if under 7x, the reticle disappeared and was replaced by a daylight bright red dot. US Optics briefly flirted with the dual focal plane scopes, where the graduated reticle was in the first focal plane and the red dot was in the second... idk if they ever pushed the tech past 1-10x though
 
I run a Steiner 4x20x50 on my 5R 300WM. It is primarily a hunting rifle though.

****I dislike exposed turrets on my hunting guns that would be advantageous for paper punching.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top