President Trump "I will never ever allow them to take away your sacred right to keep and bear arms"

Status
Not open for further replies.

LiveLife

Member
Joined
Jan 10, 2010
Messages
32,835
Location
Northwest Coast
President Trump stated Monday, "Left wing Democrats want to confiscate your guns and eliminate your God given right to self defense ... As your president, I will never allow them to take away your liberty ... and I will never ever allow them to take away your sacred right to keep and bear arms"



DOJ Submitted Gun Control Legislation To President Trump (2 weeks ago)

 
Last edited:
These are reasons why we need to be armed, for self defense, when police cannot help and our lives are in immediate danger.

Why aren't 2020 Democrat candidates talking about protecting us and our right to self defense? Why are they talking about taking our "legal" guns away from us? And how are we supposed to protect ourselves without guns in situations like these? What if there are multiple intruders? Shouldn't we have the option to defend ourselves with large capacity magazines in carbines/rifles against greater threats? What if they are wearing body armor which defeats handgun caliber bullets?

If you were in these people's situations, would you want to be armed or not armed? (When your life is in immediate danger, police are only minutes away)

2020 Democrat candidates talk about kids' safety at school from mass shooters. What about kids' safety at home from intruders? (Which BTW occurs more frequently)



 
Last edited:
They're politicians. They're playing to their constituents' fears.
The Democrats in the foreground are promising to limit gun rights without proposing any effective way to take them from anyone that isn't a legal gun owner.
Trump's entire backing demands their gun rights, but he has already proven to not only sign away what ownership rights he thinks "aren't important," but to do so without any proper process or concession.
They're levering for votes.
That's. It.
 
A.) He's already made it clear he will make compromises

B.) What does HE think constitutes the 'right to keep and bear arms"

C.) New anti constitutional legislation is coming. Maybe not today but too soon.

I would say at best we have trump for a second term followed by a swift change in legislation as a Democrat is elected.
 
We need to keep the pressure on Trump.
As this shows while he was wrong on the bump stock “compromise” he’s still better than the alternative.

Not to pick sides but either we support him or we are done as any of these anti gun zealots will gut the 2nd Amendment and make sure the UN Small Arms Treaty is implemented. And for those who haven’t actually read it, it’s frightening.

But supporting him doesn’t mean we can’t flood the White House with calls and letters and keep pressure on.
 
We need to keep the pressure on Trump.
As this shows while he was wrong on the bump stock “compromise” he’s still better than the alternative.

Not to pick sides but either we support him or we are done as any of these anti gun zealots will gut the 2nd Amendment and make sure the UN Small Arms Treaty is implemented. And for those who haven’t actually read it, it’s frightening.

But supporting him doesn’t mean we can’t flood the White House with calls and letters and keep pressure on.
Its a binary choice. Pick your poisen. One is bitter and hard to swallow sometimes. The other is lethal.
 
Trump likes the NRA because they gave him 30 million dollars.
That ... and the fact that most of the "basket of deplorables" members are probably gun owners. ;)

Anyone like what I did there with the juxtaposition of "fact" and "probably" in that sentence?

It seemed apropos to me considering the subject matter ... :)
 
Last edited:
I’ll take Trump over Beto. I’ll take Trump over any of them. Bash the guy all you want to. Yes. He banned bumpstocks. The bastard. But how’d that work out? He’s also filling courts with conservative constitutionalist judges. And that’s where the real fight will be held. If any of the quacks on the democratic ticket actually win, you’ll all be praising Trump for those appointments. Because they’ll be the ones saving your rights.
 
"I will never ever allow them to take away your sacred right to keep and bear arms"

This the problem for true believers in Trump and the GOP - the phrase 'Take Away". They always promote the defense for funding raising but defense allows the slow creep and erosion of rights. Look at Dump the Bump Trump. There was no reason to do that except for his erratic personality. The NRA story that unless he dumped the Bump, the Congress would have banned all 'assault rifles' is just Save the Wayne BS.

What has the GOP done positively recently? The AWB expired (and GWB would have signed the renewal). For the most part, Heller hasn't stopped the state bans or lifted most restrictions. Granted there have been a fewl like in Illinois and some positive lower court statements (that are usually reversed).

Bills to advance the RKBA on the Congressional Level - Do you hear Donald or the GOP ever making the HPA, Reciprocity, the SAGA act (gets rid of state bans) as legislative priorities? Mention them at the State of the Union? They couldn't wait to dump the HPA. When HR 218 passes for LEOs, there was supposed to be a correlated push for reciprocity. Never happened.

Thus, the court appointments have done much yet, so you can chortle about them. Until SCOTUS unambiguously wipes out the state bans and reaffirms that such guns are protected (as Heller waffled on), reaffirms the right to carry outside the home, etc - it's all just hot air.

So the 'take away' is just bait and switch - nothing positive. Send a check, suckers. Donald isn't scared of NO NRA. NRA is in disarray anyway, send a check.

Recall, Donald swore he would be great for the LGBT community. He posts how he supports them. Then his policies are the opposite. Take the hint about him supporting you if he feels that the politics work the other way or he has a random brain toot.

Now, you will say: He's not Hillary.

That was then and this is now. He's the one that has to perform and blind obsequious hero worship doesn't motivate him to perform for the RKBA. As folks sat home for Hillary, he needs a touch of a threat that his support isn't that firm unless he performs. The glacial pace of SCOTUS and refusal to take cases plus the ambiguity of Roberts is very worrisome.
 
Trump likes the NRA because they gave him 30 million dollars.
Some of that money was mine before I sent it to the NRA. . . and so far I'm pretty happy with how they've spent it.

More to the point, I think Trump likes the NRA because he's realized that if he says and does something like what they want, people like me keep supporting him. There's a word for that. . . um. . . democracy!
 
Trump might not be an enemy of gun owners, but he's no true friend either. He doesn't really care one way or the other, and it's obvious by the way his opinion on the matter get's swayed depending on who's talked to him last. The only reason he's postulating now is that several Democratic candidates have taken such an extreme position against guns, and Trump's doing what Trump does best and moving the focus to himself.

If he was a pro 2nd Amendment President something would have happened in our favor the first 2 years of his Presidency.
 
Don't worry everyone, the NRA and the GOP have our backs. Also, words and actions are totally the same thing.
 
"Left wing Democrats want to confiscate your guns and eliminate your God given right to self defense ... As your president, I will never allow them to take away your liberty ... and I will never ever allow them to take away your sacred right to keep and bear arms"
There's a logical contradiction here -- if a right is "God given" or "sacred" it cannot be taken away, by anyone. Therefore, if you accept this view of things, arguing about a right is moot since anyone attempting to violate such a right would be instantly struck down by fire and brimstone.

We know that that's not the case. The answer, of course, is that no human right is "God-given" or "sacred." Every single human right has been fought for by people, struggling against their reluctant human rulers. No right was ever granted as a free gift.

As a matter of fact, in the state of nature (the jungle), you have the "right" to be eaten equally with the right to defend yourself. The only law is the law of relative strength. If you are weak, you are the lion's next meal.

Let's stop talking about "God-given" rights. It's a stupid and facile trope, and it denigrates our ancestors' sacrifices. They paid dearly for every right that they were able to secure. And rights can be lost far more easily than they were gained.
 
Trump might not be an enemy of gun owners, but he's no true friend either. He doesn't really care one way or the other, and it's obvious by the way his opinion on the matter get's swayed depending on who's talked to him last. The only reason he's postulating now is that several Democratic candidates have taken such an extreme position against guns, and Trump's doing what Trump does best and moving the focus to himself.

If he was a pro 2nd Amendment President something would have happened in our favor the first 2 years of his Presidency.
You mean those first two years he spent getting obstructed by the Democrats on every front and defending himself from the Russian collusion witchhunt? Im surprised he found the time to eat breakfast every morning, let alone push for his campaign promises.......
 
The answer, of course, is that no human right is "God-given" or "sacred." Every single human right has been fought for by people, struggling against their reluctant human rulers. No right was ever granted as a free gift.
I consider right to self defense "God given" right - https://biblereasons.com/self-defense/

Exodus 22:2-3 “If a thief is caught in the act of breaking into a house and is struck and killed in the process, the person who killed the thief is not guilty of murder."

Luke 11:21 “When a strong man, fully armed, guards his own mansion, his property is safe.”


Even Jesus endorsed use of arms for protection,

Luke 22:35-37 “Then Jesus asked them ... “take your money and a traveler’s bag. And if you don’t have a sword, sell your cloak and buy one!"

Luke 22:38-39 “Look, Lord,” they replied, “we have two swords among us.” “That’s enough,”


Even Dalai Lama endorsed use of arms - https://www.thehighroad.org/index.p...lated-information.849620/page-3#post-11100167

The Dalai Lama use air rifles to protect small birds from hawks - https://www.nytimes.com/1993/11/28/magazine/the-dalai-lama.html

Dalai Lama: Yes, very much. I also had an air rifle in Lhasa. And I have one in India. I often feed small birds, but when they come together, hawks spot them and catch them -- a very bad thing. So in order to protect these small birds, I keep the air rifle.
Interviewer: So it is a Buddhist rifle?
Dalai Lama: [ Laughs ] A compassionate rifle!

In 2001, Dalai Lama spoke to 7600 Oregon and south west Washington High School students and said this about school shootings and using gun for self protection - http://community.seattletimes.nwsource.com/archive/?date=20010515&slug=dalai15m0

"One girl wanted to know how to react to a shooter who takes aim at a classmate.

... if someone has a gun and is trying to kill you, he said, it would be reasonable to shoot back with your own gun. Not at the head, where a fatal wound might result. But at some other body part, such as a leg."
 
Last edited:
Some of that money was mine before I sent it to the NRA. . . and so far I'm pretty happy with how they've spent it.

More to the point, I think Trump likes the NRA because he's realized that if he says and does something like what they want, people like me keep supporting him. There's a word for that. . . um. . . democracy!
OR payola
 
You mean those first two years he spent getting obstructed by the Democrats on every front and defending himself from the Russian collusion witchhunt? Im surprised he found the time to eat breakfast every morning, let alone push for his campaign promises.......

Republicans had control of the House and Senate for those 2 years. The only major change in firearms regulation was the banning of bumpstocks. Trump has accomplished more gun control than Obama was able to do in 8 years.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top