Titegroup, BE-86 Burn Rate, 40 S&W Max Loads and Pressure

Status
Not open for further replies.

Hartkopf

Member
Joined
Nov 11, 2019
Messages
2,797
Location
Texas
Newbie fundamental question; What happens above max loads in relation to pressure and fps?

Would the pressure rises or spikes while bullet fps levels off and stops increasing? Also how does this feel to the shooter of a pistol? I would guess a more intense "bomb" near your hand but not much more muzzle flip because the bullet wasn't accelerated any quicker?

I'm asking out of curiosity. I will not be doing anything silly.:thumbup:

I would like to know what happens passed max loads so I can identify problems as I get near max loads.

I will eventually be loading 40 S&W to max loads to duplicate hot 165gr defense ammo. I have some Titegroup at the moment but it doesn't look like it will be good for max loads. I searched and found members here recommending BE-86 for max loads. Does BE-86 burn slower than Titegroup? Slower burning is needed for max fps?
 
Newbie fundamental question; What happens above max loads in relation to pressure and fps?

Would the pressure rises or spikes while bullet fps levels off and stops increasing? Also how does this feel to the shooter of a pistol? I would guess a more intense "bomb" near your hand but not much more muzzle flip because the bullet wasn't accelerated any quicker?

Oh, above-max loads will drive the bullet faster. Max isn't defined by bullet velocity. Max is defined by peak pressure. I think maybe you've got a fundamental misapprehension as to how pressure works in internal ballistics... or maybe I'm misreading your posts.
 
Slower burning is needed for max fps?

Yes, generally. Slower burning has a later and, relatively-speaking, shallower peak pressure than faster powder. Loaded to the same total area under the curve (which will equate to the same muzzle velocity), the slower powder will have a lower peak pressure. Or, if we load the powders to the same peak pressure, then the slower powder will have more area under the curve, which will mean a higher muzzle velocity.

That's why, if you're loading for peak velocity, you generally want to look at one of the slower powders suitable for your cartridge. On the other hand, all that pressure under the curve equates to gas coming out the muzzle... which will generate more recoil than a fast powder loaded to the same velocity. That's why people use powder like Titegroup for ammo where they want to minimize recoil.
 
I would like to know what happens passed max loads so I can identify problems as I get near max loads.

What happens is the loads get hotter and then the brass fails and/or the gun blows up at some unknown point. This is why it is so important to use tested data. There is no reliable "hand chrono" that will tell you when you are in dangerous territory.
 
Be very careful trying to duplicate "hot".40 factory defense loadings.

And by "hot" I hope you mean max, factories don't load "hot", they load under SAMMI max pressure for your safety.

I agree with Dave, it doesn't sound like you understand the process well enough, which, IMHO, means I would be hesitant to try to load max in .40 untill I had a better understanding and some more experience under my belt.

Y'all be careful out there. :)
 
Yes, generally. Slower burning has a later and, relatively-speaking, shallower peak pressure than faster powder. Loaded to the same total area under the curve (which will equate to the same muzzle velocity), the slower powder will have a lower peak pressure. Or, if we load the powders to the same peak pressure, then the slower powder will have more area under the curve, which will mean a higher muzzle velocity.

That's why, if you're loading for peak velocity, you generally want to look at one of the slower powders suitable for your cartridge. On the other hand, all that pressure under the curve equates to gas coming out the muzzle... which will generate more recoil than a fast powder loaded to the same velocity. That's why people use powder like Titegroup for ammo where they want to minimize recoil.

Ok area under the curve I can understand. I can apply my passed understanding to auto camshaft lobe design and the numerous broken roller lifters in my race motors to powder charges. (trophies came as a result of broken parts :thumbup:) I will be avoiding broken guns though! :)

I might have gotten a misconception from looking at a Lyman manual that had pressure data along with fps of different powders. I needed more than the two points given (start and max) to actually understand what was happening.
 
Be very careful trying to duplicate "hot".40 factory defense loadings.

And by "hot" I hope you mean max, factories don't load "hot", they load under SAMMI max pressure for your safety.

I agree with Dave, it doesn't sound like you understand the process well enough, which, IMHO, means I would be hesitant to try to load max in .40 untill I had a better understanding and some more experience under my belt.

Y'all be careful out there. :)

Exactly! That's why I asked. :) I'm doing the research and asking for insight before I start. I know that I don't know what I don't know.

By hot I mean 165gr at 1150fps. Not 165gr at 1050fps. Maybe its just the factory tolerances but some factory ammo doesn't consistently hit 1150.
 
Oh, above-max loads will drive the bullet faster. Max isn't defined by bullet velocity. Max is defined by peak pressure. I think maybe you've got a fundamental misapprehension as to how pressure works in internal ballistics... or maybe I'm misreading your posts.

This is what I wasn't sure of. You are saying it is actually very simple, pressure in a cylinder, behind a piston. Not accounting for burn rate and area under the curve, More powder equals more pressure equals more force behind the piston, basically every time? Until parts failure. So case capacity and parts failure are the limiting factors and the way around this is by tuning the fuel?

Most things in life are not this simple so I'm just looking for verification.
 
Titegroup is a FAST burning powder and you will get into trouble "faster" if you use to much or use a "max" load. It and other "fast burning powders build up pressure quickly so not the best choice for a high pressure round like the 40SW. Experienced reloaders like it cause it is cheap to use (less powder in the case)
You would be better off using a slower burn powder,
Powder burn and pressure is not linear(it maybe over the recommended load range) but as you get towards max, fast powders get you in trouble faster (spike) Slower powders usually give more of a case fill.

JMHO, It's all debatable:)
 
One other thing you need to consider... and I found this with BE-86 and my 9mm handloads... is there is a point where more powder does not equate to more velocity because of the barrel length coupled with an incomplete burn. When selecting a powder, a number of things need to be considered... cartridge, bullet weight, projected velocity, barrel length. In my case, my 3" and 3.6" 9mm barrels were not long enough to allow a complete burn of the powder charge past a certain point... I was getting hosed with powder granules, and my recorded velocity did not change past a certain charge weight... and I was not at maximum charge yet. BE-86 was too slow for the combination I had... so back to the drawing board.

For what you are wanting to do, and like the others suggested... please do some further research before starting, there is probably a better powder than both TiteGroup and BE-86 that will get you to your velocity goal without redlining your load. I have also found stated velocities in factory ammo... and reloading data, for that matter... to be a vague guideline, never an absolute. YOU have to work up any sort of load, with your components, with your pistol, and watch for signs of overpressure... things like flattened primers, primer flow, ejector marks, bulged brass (in pistol ammo.) Those are things to look for, but not absolutes.. because nothing in handloading is absolute.
 
One other thing you need to consider... and I found this with BE-86 and my 9mm handloads... is there is a point where more powder does not equate to more velocity because of the barrel length coupled with an incomplete burn. When selecting a powder, a number of things need to be considered... cartridge, bullet weight, projected velocity, barrel length. In my case, my 3" and 3.6" 9mm barrels were not long enough to allow a complete burn of the powder charge past a certain point... I was getting hosed with powder granules, and my recorded velocity did not change past a certain charge weight... and I was not at maximum charge yet. BE-86 was too slow for the combination I had... so back to the drawing board....snip....

I found the same thing when I shot ladder loads of Blue Dot (my wife's favorite 9mm powder) out of my shield. No change in velocity across the spread.
 
A53F553C-0108-41F7-8CDE-0DFC81FD06FC.jpeg Thanks for the replies everybody. The gun is a gen 4 Glock 22. I’ve heard the chambers are supported more now than previous generations but my brass is definitely getting a little bulge at near the bottom. I’ll be watching the brass closely on all my reloads.
 
I don't know about 40 S&W or Glocks but I have found that accuracy is not very good in my semi-auto's when loaded near max pressure. My semi-auto's are far more accurate when loaded near the minimum charges recommended. Just my preference to look for accuracy not power.
 
Although I'm surprised someone here hasn't already said something about it... I'm going to say you are looking for a powder more like PowerPistol, that seems to be the darling of the action shooters. In my experience, BE-86 is a little too slow for what I think you are asking out of it.
 
This is what I wasn't sure of. You are saying it is actually very simple, pressure in a cylinder, behind a piston. Not accounting for burn rate and area under the curve, More powder equals more pressure equals more force behind the piston, basically every time? Until parts failure. So case capacity and parts failure are the limiting factors and the way around this is by tuning the fuel?

Most things in life are not this simple so I'm just looking for verification.
At the point when things go Kaboom, it’s simple, you’ve exceeded some maximum. Let’s not go Kaboom.
There’s nothing simple about the pressure curves that are a result of rapid oxidation of a highly flammable solid into a gas in a captive space.
And another thing, you may not need to get to MAX load to experience a Kaboom. Stuff happens. That’s why you start at a starting recommendation that’s below MAX and work your way up. While not recommended, it may be you can exceed MAX and not have a Kaboom, but then you’re the one I don’t want to be standing next to at the range :).
Look at the Hodgdon data online for your .40/165 combo and compare Titegroup vs CFE Pistol, and you’ll see using more powder for CFE has less pressure but more velocity. I’ve loaded a lot of Titegroup in .40 but for a different application than SD. Take a look at CFE Pistol for SD, or some powder close to it on the burn rate chart.
Good Luck!
 
At the point when things go Kaboom, it’s simple, you’ve exceeded some maximum. Let’s not go Kaboom.
There’s nothing simple about the pressure curves that are a result of rapid oxidation of a highly flammable solid into a gas in a captive space.
And another thing, you may not need to get to MAX load to experience a Kaboom. Stuff happens. That’s why you start at a starting recommendation that’s below MAX and work your way up. While not recommended, it may be you can exceed MAX and not have a Kaboom, but then you’re the one I don’t want to be standing next to at the range :).
Look at the Hodgdon data online for your .40/165 combo and compare Titegroup vs CFE Pistol, and you’ll see using more powder for CFE has less pressure but more velocity. I’ve loaded a lot of Titegroup in .40 but for a different application than SD. Take a look at CFE Pistol for SD, or some powder close to it on the burn rate chart.
Good Luck!

In my very short time of reloading I experienced something that made me back off of a load that on the surface seemed safe.

I had worked up 45acp, Berrys RN 230rg w/5.4gr Bullseye with no problems. Loaded over 1300 rounds and shot 800+. This was well above the Lyman manual but below Speer's max of 5.7.

The worrisome load was with Winchester HP 230gr w/4.9 to 4.95gr Bullseye. Yes I was ridiculously OCD weighing each charge calibrating and zeroing the scale and watching it blip from 4.9 to 5, but more on the 4.9 side. Using Speers data (max 5gr) for their 230gr Gold Dots at 1.200 oal, I set the Winchesters at 1.210. So .010 longer and .05gr less powder.

I had worked up to 4.8grs with nothing strange. Felt crisp and brass had no deformation. When I got to the above load of near 5grs, the gun had a strange, sharp vibration/jolt in my hand. Not really any more muzzle flip but more shock to my hands. (shooting a Glock 30) I backed down to 4.8grs after that.

This is why I asked in an earlier post if a person could feel the "bomb" under their hand near or passed max loads. I believe ATLDave when he wrote there is no reliable hand chrono but this load was a bit shocking, literally.
 
I will eventually be loading 40 S&W to max loads to duplicate hot 165gr defense ammo. I have some Titegroup at the moment but it doesn't look like it will be good for max loads. I searched and found members here recommending BE-86 for max loads. Does BE-86 burn slower than Titegroup? Slower burning is needed for max fps?

Although I'm surprised someone here hasn't already said something about it... I'm going to say you are looking for a powder more like PowerPistol, that seems to be the darling of the action shooters. In my experience, BE-86 is a little too slow for what I think you are asking out of it.

BE-86 looks like a good powder for your task. It is slower than Titegroup and slightly faster than Power Pistol. Load data from Speer shows it pushing 165 grain bullets faster than Titegroup or Power Pistol. Sierra's data shows it produces the same velocity as Power Pistol.
 
Last edited:
I had worked up to 4.8grs with nothing strange. Felt crisp and brass had no deformation. When I got to the above load of near 5grs, the gun had a strange, sharp vibration/jolt in my hand. Not really any more muzzle flip but more shock to my hands. (shooting a Glock 30) I backed down to 4.8grs after that.
There are those times when you have to trust your senses, like “this feels/sounds strange”. We had a guy loading .45 for a 625 revolver, and out of the 6 rounds, we’d hear “pif, pop, Bang, puf, Bang, pew”! We convinced him he needed a bit more consistency and quality control in his reloading technique. He did get better over time, the point is even the report can be useful albeit somewhat subjective. A chrono does help, but does not guarantee to keep you out out of trouble. I’d be interested to hear what you end up with. And I believe there were other threads in this forum that discussed SD exclusively.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top