Urban settings: M14, M1 underappreciated?

Status
Not open for further replies.

mshootnit

Member
Joined
Feb 4, 2007
Messages
4,472
I have been thinking back to something a relative told me about the M1 Garand in WWII recently.
For urban fighting the TV programs all say troops want shorter, compact rifles to clear rooms because they make it easier to "slice the pie". However these shorter rifles or even the SMG's lack penetration and knock down power. Especially if body armor (plates) are encountered. So a user would effectively "slice the pie" only to have a prolonged exposure while multiple rounds are fired to try and neutralize the threat.

One thing we were told by a WWII vet in our family was one reason they liked the M1 was that if the enemy were lined up right, you could drop 2-3 with one shot. It would penetrate through 2-3 soldiers.

That is where I think modern thinking needs reset. Would you rather turn the corner with the confident ability neutralize someone with a single shot, or with a carbine you know is going to take 2-4 shots? If you turned the corner on three guys stacked up, wouldn't it be nice to just pull the trigger once and drop all three?
I think our relative and others must have experienced this....
 
I think all potential conclusion drawn from the premise that anyone in a combat situation would wait for the enemy to line up so that 2-3 could be hit with the same round is not only astoundingly suspect, but worthy only of being repeated to elicit guffaws over beers.

Todd.
 
No reason for soldiers to carry rifles suitable for hunting 1200 lb moose. It's been 50 years and people still want to complain about the 5.56 round being underpowered. Maybe the pendulum swung a little too far toward the light side with the 223, but I can promise you we'd have filled more body bags over the last 50 years if we'd stayed with the 308 or 30-06. Rather than hoping 2-3 guys lined up just right and taking them out with 1 round ( I'm sure it is possible), I'd rather have more ammo in a controllable to shoot package.

People want to talk about instances where the 223 didn't stop someone fast enough. They don't want to discuss the soldiers in WW-2 that died or surrendered because they ran out of ammo. The M1 was revolutionary for it's time, but it's time is over. The M14 was a failed experiment.
 
I think all potential conclusion drawn from the premise that anyone in a combat situation would wait for the enemy to line up so that 2-3 could be hit with the same round is not only astoundingly suspect, but worthy only of being repeated to elicit guffaws over beers.

Todd.
Who said anything about waiting?
 
My grandfather was on Iwo Jima and carried a Thompson and loved everything about it. Unfortunately I never got to meet him, my uncle told me he said: “you dont use the doorknob, just shoot the door down!”
 
No reason for soldiers to carry rifles suitable for hunting 1200 lb moose. It's been 50 years and people still want to complain about the 5.56 round being underpowered. Maybe the pendulum swung a little too far toward the light side with the 223, but I can promise you we'd have filled more body bags over the last 50 years if we'd stayed with the 308 or 30-06. Rather than hoping 2-3 guys lined up just right and taking them out with 1 round ( I'm sure it is possible), I'd rather have more ammo in a controllable to shoot package.

People want to talk about instances where the 223 didn't stop someone fast enough. They don't want to discuss the soldiers in WW-2 that died or surrendered because they ran out of ammo. The M1 was revolutionary for it's time, but it's time is over. The M14 was a failed experiment.
There is another scene in the movie 1917 where two guys face opposite ways to clear a trench with their 303's. Wouldn't want to have to work the bolt but you shoot center of mass with that 303, I think the trench scene clears starts to clear out pretty quick.
 
Knockdown power is a myth because a lot of the bullet energy Is expended after it goes through the subject. Hang up a large chunk of beef or deer or elk. Shoot a pistol round through it. Then shoot with a 556 round. Then shoot it with a 308 or 06. The 30 caliber round will leave a fist sized hole. The other two not so much. Get hit in the arm bone or leg bone with a 308 and most of the time your arm or leg is gone. Again not so much the other rounds.
 
Urban combat/CQC is very complex. As far as 5.56 goes, like any other round, placement is key. The smaller and lighter your weapon is, the better for the soldier. We always found ourselves toting "100 pounds of lightweight gear" The M4 carbine and similar weapons are an excellent all-purpose weapon for most applications, and they really shine in urban terrain. And unless I "dome" a combatant, he or she will always have multiple holes in the body- regardless of what weapon/caliber I happen to be carrying.
 
Using a cartridge designed for shooting at 800 at bad breath distances has disadvantages: recoil reduces the speed of follow up shots, the rifle is bigger and heavier than necessary, and you can’t carry as much ammo (both in each magazine and total round count) as a lighter weapon.

I find it telling that the IDF expects to fight a lot in other people’s houses and from vehicles chose the short barreled Tavor as their main rifle.

BSW
 
I carried and use SMG's in the RVN, like them and had no trouble putting people in their place, but with that said the stuff the young guys are doing now a days, I see no better tool then a CAR-15 or M4 style short rifle
 
Using a cartridge designed for shooting at 800 at bad breath distances has disadvantages: recoil reduces the speed of follow up shots, the rifle is bigger and heavier than necessary, and you can’t carry as much ammo (both in each magazine and total round count) as a lighter weapon.

I find it telling that the IDF expects to fight a lot in other people’s houses and from vehicles chose the short barreled Tavor as their main rifle.

BSW
All good points
 
Knockdown power is a myth because a lot of the bullet energy Is expended after it goes through the subject. Hang up a large chunk of beef or deer or elk. Shoot a pistol round through it. Then shoot with a 556 round. Then shoot it with a 308 or 06. The 30 caliber round will leave a fist sized hole. The other two not so much. Get hit in the arm bone or leg bone with a 308 and most of the time your arm or leg is gone. Again not so much the other rounds.
Right, and I don't think of 30-06 as knock down so much as I think of it as "goes through him, his buddy, and the guy that just showed up with a 30 cal. and steadily increasing sized hole."
 
out of curiosity, will a 27-2800fps .30 punch thru any common body armor a 556 will not?

I think it’d come down to bullet construction. I’d expect AP bullets to punch thru most body armor from either caliber. Gilding metal and lead I suspect .223 might have more penetration because of higher velocity and smaller area of the armor to defeat.

BSW
 
I think all potential conclusion drawn from the premise that anyone in a combat situation would wait for the enemy to line up so that 2-3 could be hit with the same round is not only astoundingly suspect, but worthy only of being repeated to elicit guffaws over beers.

Todd.

I didn't read anything about "waiting for the enemy to line up". I did see the possibility of taking out multiples. Somebody else said they didn't want over-penetration... that assumes hostages rather than multiple enemy combatants.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top