44 Mag Results and Questions

Status
Not open for further replies.

Lee Q. Loader

Member
Joined
Jan 30, 2018
Messages
443
The following post contains load data that was carefully worked up in my revolver. They are near, but under published max

I drove out to the desert and shot a lot of 44 Mag rounds out of my Redhawk 5.5" barrel.
I've been trying to see which powder I liked best out of H110, 300MP and 2400.

I loaded a bunch of rounds of each powder working up to very near MAX . In all cases I used the Zero 240gr JSP.

I got good accuracy with all the powders, with the most accurate for each powder as follows:

H110 - 23.9 grains, 1303 FPS average for 5 shots
300MP - 24.6 grains, 1294 FPS average for 5 shots
2400 - 20.8 grains, 1305 FPS average for 5 shots

Recoil on all these was tolerable for me, but somewhat unpleasant. My conclusion is that I'll use 2400 when the other powders run out. Strictly for reasons of economy.
This kind of info from other users is what like to read most on this forum, so I wanted to pass this on.

Here is something unusual I'd like your opinions on:
with the 2400, I went up to 21.0 grains. These were a little sticky on extraction and I won't go there again, but the weird thing was the velocity, about 1280 FPS which is 25 FPS lower than I got with 20.8 grains.
I'm very certain I didn't mess up the powder charges, I'm VERY meticulous about that.
Is there anything that would case this besides errors on the chrono?
Do the other velocities I reported above sound about right?
 
It is not uncommon for velocity to stop increasing or actually decrease, past a certain point of adding more powder. At one time it was how folks with Chronos determine they were at max for their gun(as long as it is within the parameters of tested and published loads). Sticky extraction is always a sign to me I've gone too far.
 
Those are all very popular 44 Mag powder so I am about to buck the crown. Those powders are IMHO on the slow side especially for a 5.5-inch revolver. Your not burning it all in the barrel hence the plateau in velocity. You are probably getting a fair bit of muzzle flash and muzzle blast too. I have switch my 44 Mag loads to IMR 800-x, a much faster burning powder, and am getting the same velocity as 23 gr of H110 with only 13.5 gr of 800-x from my 6.5 inch M29. No muzzle flash and less blast and recoil too. If I was loading 44 Mag primarily for a carbine than H110 would probably be my choice but since I am using it in both I like the lack of flash and blast from 800-x. I save the H110 for 450 Bushmaster and 410 Shotgun loads. YMMV.
 
I've done a lot of testing with H110 and 2400 in 44 magnum. Recently, I ran the gamut with Hornady 180, 20, 240,and 300g XTP projectiles.

H110 will obviously produce the most velocity, it did in nearly every load I made. It produces a sharper recoil and loud crack as well. 2400 is no slouch making a loud kaboom and more of a thud type of recoil vs a whip (hard to explain, but running them back to back I can tell a unique difference).

My personal results are better with 2400, not sure why but it is the powder I shoot 44 best with.

Either way, it's fun to play around with them both.
 
My “Ole Faithful” is 240gr JHP, 17.3gr Bluedot, Large Pistol Primers. Accurate to 125yds, within a 3 inch tube. Out of a 4” barrel. Fire feather. It accurate..

Dan
 
It is not uncommon for velocity to stop increasing or actually decrease, past a certain point of adding more powder. At one time it was how folks with Chronos determine they were at max for their gun(as long as it is within the parameters of tested and published loads). Sticky extraction is always a sign to me I've gone too far.
Very interesting, thank you for clearing the up for me.
The 21.0 grains of 2400 cases were just the least bit sticky, the 20.8 grains of 2400 cases would fall out without using the extractor.
 
Very interesting, thank you for clearing the up for me.
The 21.0 grains of 2400 cases were just the least bit sticky, the 20.8 grains of 2400 cases would fall out without using the extractor.
suggest you try a different primer. sounds like your current primer isn't igniting the larger load properly. only one way to find out.

luck,

murf
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top