The “Perfect” .22 Rifle

Status
Not open for further replies.
Anybody else been looking for it?

I'm not sure I'll ever find the perfect .22 rifle. I grew up with a Marlin 60, had a Ruger 10/22 and had a Beretta Neos Carbine. Currently I still have a Marlin 39AS, a CZ452T, and a pair of 16" barreled Zastavas. I've fired the basic Henry rimfire lever and then there is the Browning BL22 that still calls me for some reason.

I still can't get the thought out of my head of a modified Marlin tube magazine bolt action. Basically, an XT or similar with the barrel lopped to 16.25" and the mag tube shortened to be just longer than the forend of the stock. It would hold maybe 6 to 8 cartridges in the tube, but I'd modify the butt stock with a trap door to hold maybe 18 to 24 spare rounds. Old school thinking with that idea, for some reason I like the thought of a fully protected mag tube and not having to keep track of detachable box magazines.

I decided to order a different model Henry a few days ago, the Youths Carbine. This model features a 13” length of pull, much more ideal for me. It also has a lighter round profile barrel of 16” in length. This should make an excellent field packing choice and still holds a respectful dozen shots of Long Rifles or 16 Shorts.
...
I think this might be the one guys. I plan on outfitting it the same as my Frontier, that being a 4x Gru-Bee 3/4” Baby Redfield copy with rings, hammer extension, leather lever wrap, and a sling.

Looking forward to seeing if this is "The One" for you. :cool:
 
Last edited:
My perfect 22 is the Marlin 39A. I love the accuracy and the awesome wood and blue steel craftsmanship. Unfortunately, it is built of unobtainium these days.

One interesting trend is how many here mention that they had a 39A, sold it, and now wish they had not. A common trend with BHP owners.

Shoot on...

upload_2021-11-1_8-4-40.png
 
Consider the Taurus (or Winchester) Model 63: an all steel and wood classic
Has a slim receiver like a lever action with the solid heft of a center fire
No cocking knob sticking out the side and it doesn't throw hot empties down your shirt sleeve line the Browning ATD
It even takes down
 
Last edited:
If parts were available I would have a Winchester 490 as my perfect 22. It is one of the two man-sized semi-autos that I know of without adding anything. I had a couple but someone always offered to much money for me to resist. It is a shame that Winchester dropped them. The other is the Weatherby XXII but for some reason they never appealed to me. Sorry, but I'm not a glossy guy.

I have a Winchester 190 and the only reason it sticks around is that its the first semi-auto 22 that I got from my Grampa. Hopefully the 490 has a better trigger than the 190/290 versions. The 190/290 triggers are horrible.
 
IME, there is no "perfect 22" (or for that matter, any other gun) unless you specify what it'll be used for. If shooting a 22 rifle for groups or best accuracy (something I end up doing almost every time I have a rifle out), a bigger, heavier target-style gun will out perform a smaller, lighter gun, all else being somewhat equal. But that same 10+ pound target gun would be far from perfect on a 5 mile trek through the squirrel woods. For me, for perfect 22, it'd likely be some sort of bolt action, and I'd want to list multiple categories:
- Target/accuracy shooting from a bench-type setup: BRNO Model 4 (I love this old gun, and if conditions are right, it's perhaps my favorite to shoot among all of the guns I have)
- Lighter weight for lots of totin' but still MOA accurate: CZ 452 in Trainer, Lux, FS, or American format (or a Scout if really going for light and less cumbersome for carrying)
- All-around, all-purpose, not the very best for anything but very good at everything I like to do, light enough for me to carry distances, and capable of sub-half MOA accuracy: CZ 453 Varmint
 
Over the years I had many .22 l.r. rifles in very different price ranges that I have enjoyed. Those rifles were also used for very different sporting purposes, besides of the guns I had been issued. My military past and the countless military competitions have had an undeniable influence on my choice of rimfire rifles in my older age, when I can afford to spend my money on my hobby and not the children's tuition and bills.
I learnt early that the Anschutz 54 Match rifle is a helpful tool to get up on the stairs of the winner's podium but have always preferred the more practical Anschutz line of hunting rifles, that were also based on the 54 action that the great Walther Gehmann had developed for Anschutz out of the same action that was a parent to the Suhl 150, Walther KKM, as well as the first Brno sporters made in the Tschechische Gewehrfabrik.

While not perfect, the Anschutz 1423 Stutzen is the rifle that I enjoy mostly for its accuracy and utility value.
Anschutz-1423-2.jpg

This Anschutz, issued as the G33 in the post-war Bundeswehr is a rifle I am especially attached to and it is one of my favorite 25 yard offhand shooters.
G33-09197.jpg

The Brno Mod. 1 is a sleeper with an incredibly smooth action
Mod-1-58166.jpg
When I was more seriously into shooting, this heayy rifle was fun to shoot offhand:
IMG-0024.jpg
It just fits better into the safe without the buttplate;)
 
Last edited:
Anybody else been looking for it?

Over the past several years I’ve tried several different .22 rifles for the role of general/all purpose plinking, hunting, and field gun.

I’ve tried the Nylon 66, the Marlin 60, CZ-452 bolt action, Remington 552 Speedmaster, and a couple others and each has assets I enjoy but none has been “the one” and got sold save the Nylon 66, which is tough to successfully mount a scope to (one of my requirements) and is becoming a collectible so isn’t really suited for rough field use these days due to parts sourcing issues.

The closest yet is my Henry’s Frontier model lever gun. I really, really like it for a variety of reasons. Cycles smooth, feeds anything beautifully, has a solid trigger, just a hoot. Yet that particular model has a 14” length of pull and does not fit my small man frame too well. I feel like I’ve got to really push my hand way forward to cock the gun and it’s rather awkward. And the 20” octagonal barrel is fairly long and a bit heavy for a field .22 in my opinion. Still, it’s the closest yet.

I decided to order a different model Henry a few days ago, the Youths Carbine. This model features a 13” length of pull, much more ideal for me. It also has a lighter round profile barrel of 16” in length. This should make an excellent field packing choice and still holds a respectful dozen shots of Long Rifles or 16 Shorts.

View attachment 1034938

I think this might be the one guys. I plan on outfitting it the same as my Frontier, that being a 4x Gru-Bee 3/4” Baby Redfield copy with rings, hammer extension, leather lever wrap, and a sling. I have found Henry’s to be outstanding and it won’t be an expensive collectible that I won’t be afraid to get out on the trail for squirrel busting and can blasting. Add the excellent customer service, widespread availability of parts, and Made in USA (or not at all, as the company slogan goes) and it should be a winner.

Expect a detailed range report to follow. I’m real hopeful that this one will get me as close yet.

-JCF
I have my M&P 15-22 which I love, it's a fun tack driver but I have been eyeing the exact same one you ordered. :thumbup:
 
OK. I finally had to pipe in: My Mossberg 46B, circa 1946-1949. Was an infant when it was made, then went hunting at age 9 when the gun was about 10 years old. Came with a crappy 4X Weaver scope, which still allowed me to bag a crow at 100-200 yards. Now it has a proper 3-9X scope and new trigger guard which I made (bakelite was not made to last). Indoors at 75 feet I can shoot (supported) one-hole groups. As Charlton Heston said: they will have to pry this from my cold dead hands before I give it up. Mossberg really knew how to make the basics back then.
 
I have a Winchester 190 and the only reason it sticks around is that its the first semi-auto 22 that I got from my Grampa. Hopefully the 490 has a better trigger than the 190/290 versions. The 190/290 triggers are horrible.
The 490 is a completely different animal. They have a steel receiver, decent sights, and a walnut stock with checkering. Many were made in Canada.
 
I have had my Remington 572 since 1969 and cannot part with it. Perfect? No, but really a sweet, fun gun to shoot.
For price, fun and accuracy for the money spent, I have to give the nod to my Tikka T1X with the semi-custom 6 round magazines. I wish Tikka/Sako/Beretta would make a flush-fitting 5 rounder, tho!
 
I have always liked .22's. I still have the Winchester 74 I learned to shoot in the 1950's. It was my dad's. My favorite has to be my CZ 452 American. It has really nice wood and great polished bluing. The best part is I have won nearly all the matches I have entered with it. It is light enough to hunt with too. I do have a heavier 540 XR for more serious shooting.
 
One vote for a Ruger 10/22 here. If I was just going to have one .22lr it would be the 10/22 carbine. I have shot a few others, seen and handled a few more but for me the 10/22 is the one for me. I know I'm just recommending what I own and like but so is everybody else :D.

I just have had good luck with em, they eat anything, run dirty, acceptable to excellent in the accuracy department although you always hear about the occasional innacurate or unreliable rifle but that's true of pretty much any gun. They aren't the most interesting and are one of the most popular and that can make them seem boring but for your stated purpose, it fits the bill and I know you're a semi auto kind of guy so.......
 
Now we need thread for favorite lever .22, semi-auto .22, and bolt .22. In order, that would be my Marlin 39A, Bergara BXR, and Remington 541S. A footnote: the friend who sold the 39A to me is sorry he did, but glad a friend is enjoying it. They are in a dead heat in the accuracy department. I do love those .22s
 
I think I’m at 14 now after paring down last year plus 5 pistols/revolvers. Used to have 2 safes dedicated to just rimfires that were range only. I should revisit what I have squirreled away soon, been too long.
 
Believe the answer lies with a somewhat famous person in the "gun category". Townsend Whelen said it best, "....only accurate guns are interesting."

To be completely "accurate", what Colonel Whelen really said was "Only accurate rifles are interesting." As for me, I've had more than my share of rifles having less than stellar accuracy that I've found to be plenty interesting.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top