Ugly Sauce
Member
- Joined
- Oct 26, 2020
- Messages
- 6,275
Mike, thank you sir. On the Walker, the main spring seems to have rather easy action on the hammer whereas the 1851 seemingly has a strong spring. That makes sense that deepening of the recoil shield in that it allows an easy path for the spent cap to escape? I sure need a lot of work on these guns.Well, the revolving cylinder typically kicks it to the right and clear of the revolver. Some folks deepen the "spent cap relief" in the right recoil shield (or make one if non existent). It generally works very well if you cycle the revolver with force (as if in competition) rather than "easy cycling". Then again, the late timing of most out of the box revolvers makes them not a good candidate for " fast handling " so to speak . . .
Another reason for a cap post is that it allows for a reduced main spring which makes for an easier and faster handling revolver. Reduced main spring also lessens damage to the hammer face and nipples.
Mike
Alright guys, I'm slow here. That photo that Dave44 posted is very nice and the rake install looks like it was part of the original gun when purchased!! but what happens to the spent cap once it hits the rake? It still seems to me that there is a remote possibility of it getting lodged in the action? Please set me straight if i am in error and thanks, Z
Its very well made and accurate also. Im glad i bought it. Its got alot of thump for its size. I may take her out again tomorrowI always wantedtoget oneof those pocket polices... nice gun!