Asian milsurp?

Joined
Dec 2, 2021
Messages
1,145
Location
The Beautiful Blue Ridge Mountains NC
My BIL sent me some pics of a mystery rifle (a mystery to both of us) he just picked up. Has absolutely no markings of any kind but these Asian characters I don't know what language exactly. We have no idea what it's chambered in or anything
 

Attachments

  • 4488.jpeg
    4488.jpeg
    148.3 KB · Views: 71
  • 4478.jpeg
    4478.jpeg
    102.2 KB · Views: 71
  • 4477.jpeg
    4477.jpeg
    86.2 KB · Views: 146
Type 38 Receiver Markings

Type 38 - Model of 1905
Found in Long, Short Rifle,
and Carbine Configurations​
Nagoya Type 38 Double Circle Receiver Markings

Type 38 - Model of 1905
Double Circle Rifle or
Concentric Circle Rifle​
Tokyo Type 38 Long Rifle with 'Love of Country' Markings

Type 38 - Model of 1905
'Love of Country' marks
either side of Chrysanthemum​
Mexican Contract Type 38 Long Rifle 1913

Mexican Type 38 - 1913
Rifle/Carbine configuration
No Type/Arsenal markings​
Type 38 Carbine
 
That’s an Arisaka. Japanese sporterized rifle from WWII.

Also, one can note the knurled back cocking piece, another dead giveaway of Arisaka’s.

The chrysanthemum has been ground off.
I've read about that. Our government demanded GI's ground it off. I've also heard it told that some times the Japanese ground it off to avoid surrendering something that had the symbol of the emperor on it. I've seen one on person markings in tact. I had no idea what it was but I did tell him straight out of the gate it was sporterized
 
I've read about that. Our government demanded GI's ground it off. I've also heard it told that some times the Japanese ground it off to avoid surrendering something that had the symbol of the emperor on it. I've seen one on person markings in tact. I had no idea what it was but I did tell him straight out of the gate it was sporterized

It’s the latter of the above. It was disgraceful to surrender the mum a symbol of the emperor.

An intact mum carries more value due to rarity and completeness. But your metal looks in good shape, there are a lot of Arisakas in poor shape due to the nature of their environment.
 
It’s the latter of the above. It was disgraceful to surrender the mum a symbol of the emperor.

An intact mum carries more value due to rarity and completeness. But your metal looks in good shape, there are a lot of Arisakas in poor shape due to the nature of their environment.
Are you certain it was always the latter? I've read that swastikas, war eagles, and wermacht crosses were required by our military to be removed. I've also seen arisakas with the flower crudely crossed out
 
The symbol closest to the bolt stands for “Type”.

The two “)(“ stands for “8”.

Above the “)(“ there is 3 lines of different lengths, the latter two have been scrubbed along with the mum stands for “3”

So you have an Arisaka Type 38 in your hands.

I guess technically since Japanese read right to left you have a “38 Type” Arisaka.

index.php
 
Are you certain it was always the latter? I've read that swastikas, war eagles, and wermacht crosses were required by our military to be removed. I've also seen arisakas with the flower crudely crossed out

I guess anything’s possible, but if one studies Japanese culture and their thoughts on honor/dishonor, and I know for a fact they did remove mums ahead of capture/surrender/defeat if at all possible. With this in mind I would assume most were removed at the orders of superiors within the Japanese army.

But I guess a GI who had a horrific encounter on one of those bloody island conflicts sure could have desired to deface the mum. I just don’t see this as being the main culprit.
 
The Type’s numbers correspond with the year of the Emporers reign. So a Type 38 was established in the 38th year reign of the current emporer (forgot his name).
 
I guess anything’s possible, but if one studies Japanese culture and their thoughts on honor/dishonor, and I know for a fact they did remove mums ahead of capture/surrender/defeat if at all possible. With this in mind I would assume most were removed at the orders of superiors within the Japanese army.

But I guess a GI who had a horrific encounter on one of those bloody island conflicts sure could have desired to deface the mum. I just don’t see this as being the main culprit.
Definitely in the case of the rifle in question it was removed by the Japanese as it has been done neatly. If that's what we are looking at. I'm 90% sure.its not in my hands it down in GA it's my BILs. Although I'm now plotting to convince him to sell it since ammo is about $2.50 a round and he has 6 kids but I have none so I can afford to shoot it
 
The mum would have been between the chamber over pressure ports and the barrel shank.
 
If you can get him to get a picture of the serial number area along side the receiver I can tell you what Japanese Arsenal it was manufactured in.
 
He insists the markings shown are the only ones on it
They may be below the top of the stock as it wraps the left side of the receiver. The red on the edited picture is where one finds the serial number and Arsenal marks.

the should be just in front of the Mauser style bolt release on the left side of the receiver. IMG_6430.jpeg
 
Last edited:
It’s already been sporterized, so rechambering/rebarreling shouldn’t be off the table. The Type 38s were well built and the Arisaka is a very strong action (see Ackley), so a good candidate. 6.5x 257 Toberts was a popular post War conversion for the 6.5x50 Arisaka. The chamber should clean up to 6.5x55 SE, which are hot CIP loads. I don’t know whether 6.5CM would - might need to rebarrel, in which case, lots of options.
 
To muddy the water a bit, the newly formed PLA in China had a many hundred thousand Arisaka left/abandoned/surrendered in China, and many were repurosed to PRC use.
Some of those filtered out into various wars PRC was involved in.

In addition Arisaka, pre war, was sold to places like Thailand, and which would have had the royal crest of Siam on them.

Probably a chamber cast is wanted to see just how it's presently fitted up. Many 7.7s were "bubba" rebored to 30-06 using electric drills. Some of the 6.5s were rebored to various calibers, too.

And, there's more than a ton of fuddlore on whether or not an intact "mum" was legal or not. And all manner of tools, like bench grinders and the like were pressed into use, "back in the day."
 
Back
Top