Tony Mig
Member
Though I'm liabel to repeat what many here have already said, I'll throw my two cents worth in on this one anyway......
First and foremost, I think the hatered towards the Glock stems from it's lack of traditional design and it has no long standing history.
When you pick up a modern stainless steel S&W revolver, you can still see it's design origins through out the gun. Same with any 1911, it's got history, it's proved itself in many battles, and on many compition target ranges like Camp Perry, it's made of tradition materials just like the first one's to come off the Colt assembly line close to a century ago. Glock does not have that.
Unlike a 1911, one's ability to modify a Glock is very limited. Even with a Colt or S&W revolver you can change the sights, and try an unlimited variety of wood, or rubber grips. The modifications that can be done to a 1911 is almost limitless.
All guns are utilitarian, but until the Glock showed up, most every other gun made to that point could be cutomized with nickle finishes, engraving, gold inlays, polished and given a deep charcoal bluing.....there ain't much that you can do to a Glock's finish to improve it's appeal.
Now I personally do not hate Glock's, I will not own one because I don't like the grip angle, and the trigger also pinches my finger...(and these fingers see a lot of manual labor, plus they are caloused from guitar playing)
I do however own a Springfield XD, and even though the triggers are similar, the XD trigger does not pinch my fingers. I also like the grip angle as it just feels right in my hands, and allows me to naturally point the gun toward my target.
Another thing that has caused a lot of hatered towards Glock is it's popluarity with the gansta/urban criminal element. These are the smae poeple that have caused a lot of the anti gun sediment in this country, and that has made our hobby a difficult one to enjoy.
Glock has become to the gun world, what the cheap Japanees car became to the auto world, some love them because they are cheap to buy, they seem to do what they were designed to do, they are also cheap to operate, and most of them last a long time without any major malfunction. And there are those that hate these cars because they don't represent traditional American styling, size, or horse power.
It was stated in an earlier post that Glock has had it's 15 minutes of fame, as many police dept's are going back to more traditional handguns. This statement is very true, as we have seen many of the leading federal agencies also changing the way they view service arms for their agents, and have drifted towards the 1911/.45 ACP platform totally bypassing the police favored .40 S&W.
It many not happen in my lifetime, but there will come a day when the Glock will be viewed as a historic novelty, and people will still be shooting 1911's, BHP's, and my favorite...."The Wheel Gun"......
First and foremost, I think the hatered towards the Glock stems from it's lack of traditional design and it has no long standing history.
When you pick up a modern stainless steel S&W revolver, you can still see it's design origins through out the gun. Same with any 1911, it's got history, it's proved itself in many battles, and on many compition target ranges like Camp Perry, it's made of tradition materials just like the first one's to come off the Colt assembly line close to a century ago. Glock does not have that.
Unlike a 1911, one's ability to modify a Glock is very limited. Even with a Colt or S&W revolver you can change the sights, and try an unlimited variety of wood, or rubber grips. The modifications that can be done to a 1911 is almost limitless.
All guns are utilitarian, but until the Glock showed up, most every other gun made to that point could be cutomized with nickle finishes, engraving, gold inlays, polished and given a deep charcoal bluing.....there ain't much that you can do to a Glock's finish to improve it's appeal.
Now I personally do not hate Glock's, I will not own one because I don't like the grip angle, and the trigger also pinches my finger...(and these fingers see a lot of manual labor, plus they are caloused from guitar playing)
I do however own a Springfield XD, and even though the triggers are similar, the XD trigger does not pinch my fingers. I also like the grip angle as it just feels right in my hands, and allows me to naturally point the gun toward my target.
Another thing that has caused a lot of hatered towards Glock is it's popluarity with the gansta/urban criminal element. These are the smae poeple that have caused a lot of the anti gun sediment in this country, and that has made our hobby a difficult one to enjoy.
Glock has become to the gun world, what the cheap Japanees car became to the auto world, some love them because they are cheap to buy, they seem to do what they were designed to do, they are also cheap to operate, and most of them last a long time without any major malfunction. And there are those that hate these cars because they don't represent traditional American styling, size, or horse power.
It was stated in an earlier post that Glock has had it's 15 minutes of fame, as many police dept's are going back to more traditional handguns. This statement is very true, as we have seen many of the leading federal agencies also changing the way they view service arms for their agents, and have drifted towards the 1911/.45 ACP platform totally bypassing the police favored .40 S&W.
It many not happen in my lifetime, but there will come a day when the Glock will be viewed as a historic novelty, and people will still be shooting 1911's, BHP's, and my favorite...."The Wheel Gun"......