The Maryland AWB of 2007

Status
Not open for further replies.
Nico....

If it's ok with you, I'm gonna borrow some of your text in the letter I draft for Senator Mooney (who I believe will oppose this, but we'll help him decide for sure).

I'm also going to email a copy of my letter to a few of my buddies who own guns, but are pencil-shy. Time for everyone who has been napping to get off the couch and stand next to those of you who have been carrying the torch.

Michael
 
Of course it's OK with me. In fact, I'm flattered that you'd find it useful.

Just to be clear, I'm definitely not one of the one's who's been "carrying the torch." My school schedule (undergrad and now dental school) hasn't allowed me to go to Annapolis and might not for a few years. I do want to be as active as I can this year by writing letters and making phone calls, and I hope others will too. I plan on sending letters on my parents' behalf (with their permission of course).

This past year's election was a real eye opener for me, ignorant as it may seem. I never realized how few people actually vote in a given state district (House or Senate). Out of that small group, the number of people who actually care enough to write/call their representatives must be even smaller, which makes one letter or call mean a lot more than it would if more people participated.
 
"Lenett takes shot at new ban on assault weapons"

He just got elected as a CeasefireMD operative, and he sure has hit the ground running (we did see it coming)...

http://www.gazette.net/stories/011907/polia s194537_32028.shtml

Lenett takes shot at new ban on assault weapons
Friday, Jan. 19, 2007

by Douglas Tallman
Staff Writer

ANNAPOLIS — Calling it a commonsense public safety measure, Sen. Mike G. Lenett has introduced a bill that would ban military-style assault weapons ‘‘no self-respecting hunter would ever need.”

‘‘I do believe there is a constitutional right under the 2nd Amendment [to own firearms],” said Lenett (D-Dist. 19) of Silver Spring. ‘‘I don’t believe that right encompasses civilians having the possession of military-style semi-automatic weapons.”

The bill uses the same definition of assault weapon that formed the basis of a 1994 federal ban. Lenett said he helped to draft that ban when he served as counsel to the U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee.

The ban ultimately expired, and Sen. Robert J. Garagiola (D-Dist. 15) of Germantown had tried to impose a state ban. It, too, failed.

Garagiola is one of 20 Democrats cosponsoring the legislation. He said he was not a lead sponsor of the bill this year, because gun legislation is hard to get out of the Judicial Proceedings Committee if the sponsor is not a member. A former member of JPR, Garagiola now sits on the Senate Finance Committee.

The guns banned by Lenett’s bill can spray bullets to enhance their killing effect.

‘‘They do not belong on our streets,” Lenett said.

Senate Minority Leader David R. Brinkley said he would not be supporting the legislation.

‘‘It’s a typical solution in search of a problem,” said Brinkley (R-Dist. 4) of New Market. ‘‘It’s spread from suburban areas where they’re ignorant on some details in regards to firearms.”

Brinkley said most if not all of his Senate caucus would oppose the measure. ‘‘Our concern continues to be getting some of the violent people off the street and enforcing some of the rules and regulations that we have,” he said.

‘‘I didn’t come here to join a club and be wined and dined at receptions,” Lenett said. ‘‘I came here to fight for the values I believe in.”

Actually, it is WORSE than the 1994 AWB.

And why are "military-style" firearms bad, but not the "non-military" ones that do the same thing, the exact same way, with the exact same ammo?

LTE is forthcoming.

It is going to be a l-o-o-n-g eight years . . .
 
It doesn't use the same language as the 1994 Federal AWB- it uses the same language as the two different bills that resulted in CA's assault wespons laws. large sections of it were ripped straight from the California code, especuallt the detachable magazine stuff.
 
The guns banned by Lenett’s bill can spray bullets to enhance their killing effect.

What the hell is this!?:fire: It's not like anyone should doubt the Gazette's political leanings, but this statement in a so-called news article is just plain absurd.
 
Even worse the text is up and any weapon owned that would be banned has to be registered, ie. just like Cali.

Guys I know I wasn't in Annapolis last year, oddes are not good for me this year. I work in a real small comany doing a lot of volume so it takes every person. Further with all of the politial bs in this state, honestly I'm just burnt out on it.

Spot, Norton, Girl /w gun, Annapex and everyone else I have never gotten over what Sandy Abrams did to us in our meeting with Nancy. I still haven't forgotten the infighting when MSI first launched. And honestly it seems every time we have a good plan to make some progress some other "expert gun owner" ie Sandy, Steve etc... Seems to throw it under the bus...

It was truly one of the reasons I retreated back to the Eastern Shore. Now what I feared most in our political climate has come true. It goes back to that poll you ran awhile back Spot:

http://www.thehighroad.org/showthread.php?t=211581

My response back then:

If I had to take my choice, it is for no confiscation. I think REGISTRATION IS LIKELY under O'Mally thus my vote for no confiscation.

Now here it is. At least Step 1. I don't like the defacto pistol registration we have, now if (and I think it is likely) this passes both houses we have to register or we are criminals.

The truth, for me is this, I will do my best to make Annapolis this year. I truly hope the NRA decides to make a stand in this state for once and not look for compromise. All gun owners in MD need to stand together on this or we will lose more ground. I am not fear mongering here I am speaking the truth as I see it and what happened to John Gianetti is a perfect example. We lost ground when we lost John. He was the swing vote on a ban not to long ago, he sided with us and he paid. I wish he were still there, god knows he was a good man on many other issues also, he had common sense. Either way I seriously think the deck is stacked against us this year. I will work as hard as my job and my energy levels allow me to. But I think we are in serious trouble.

Final note: I will not register any firearms with MD at this point. If this bill passes my arms and I shall find new residence in the state of Delaware.
 
Everyone needs to calm down and repeat what we heard repeatedly before the most recent election.....


"Democrats are our friends, they don't want to take our guns."



See don't you feel better now.

Good Luck Marylanders. We here in Illinois are about to begin the same (AWB) fight with our Democrat House, Senate and Governor. May both bills not pass.
 
I will not register any firearms with MD at this point. If this bill passes my arms and I shall find new residence in the state of Delaware.

I hate to say it, but when I'm done with school in a few years, the political climate is going to have a big effect on whether I stay here. I really hate the thought of giving up, but people on both sides of the political spectrum are saying that MD is liable to become even more of a CA/MA clone under o'malley's reign, and we all know that once an AWB passes, it's not going anywhere.

If that's true, and I stay here, I will be used as a scapegoat for most of society's ills because I am a gun owner and will be "rich" (nevermind the ~$200k in student loans I'll have). I refuse to spend hundreds of thousands of dollars (if not over $1 million by then) on a house and live in a place where I'll be vilified by despicable, hypocritical SOBs like o'malley, franchot, and gansler.
 
Any Idea When Gun Bill Day Will Be

Any thoughts on when the gun bills will be heard in committee this year?

Spot/Norton/anyone - last year we brought in Massad Ayoob to speak - any thoughts on bringing in someone like Gary Kleck (not sure if he travels to speak) or Massad this year? Count me in if we need $$ for their travel if so.

Michael
 
MDHunter,

No word on the hearings yet. They'll wait until the last second to post it so that we have to work harder to get folks to show up.
 
Good idea Michael. I'd like to get some of the manufacturers to come and testify (Beretta's stock with me would go through the roof if they came out and publicly fought for the rights of Marylanders to buy their products.) I know most manufacturers give campaign contributions, but that "behind the scenes" stuff makes our side look weak in the public's eye (and probably in the general assembly too.)

There's thousands and thousands of people in Maryland who own AR's and other "assault weapons." I have no idea how much money most spend each year, but knowing what I spend (and I don't think I'm much of an enthusiast.....maybe a hobbyist?) and multiplying it by 10 or 20 thousand sure sounds like a big economic impact to me.
 
Clayton Cramer

He is scheduled to be in the area around bill time. (If I remember correctly usually around the second week in Feb.) From Bob Culver and our local friends Montgomery Citizens for a Safer Maryland MCSM:

This is an early reminder that the next MCSM meeting is on the usual
day, Tuesday February 13 at the usual time of 7PM at the usual
American Legion Hall meeting location.
Meeting Location Details at; <http://www.mcsm.org/location.html>


Our special guest will be Clayton Cramer, the author of the book
described in the attached flyer. [NOT ATTACHED] I won't waste words here, you can
read about it in the flyer. Just be assured that this book is
important in that it debunks an anti-gun historian who became the
darling of the anti-gun lobby, at least until the facts were
presented by Clayton. This one will be FUN.


Please visit the MCSM web site at <www.mcsm.org> for updates on
other activities, book signings, talk show appearances, gun shows,
etc. that will be taking place regarding Clayton and his book in the
week of his appearance at our MCSM meeting.


SPREAD THE WORD - Bring Friends.


See you at the meeting.
 
Last edited:
more press on the AWB; NEW ATTACK ON PREEMPTION

Things are really heating up here in MD. After the 2006 elections, the anti-gun-owner crowd is going full-bore (ha) to get some gun laws passed here, ANY guns laws they can, in the hopes of generating national momentum (undoubtedly hoping that momentum will at least hit DC, which is one state line away).

The Baltimore Examiner ran a story on 1/20:

Effort to ban assault weapons facing uphill climb in Annapolis

Stephanie Tracy, The Examiner
Jan 20, 2007 3:00 AM (2 days ago)
Current rank: # 384 of 14,292 articles

BALTIMORE - If at first you don’t succeed, try again. And give the job to the freshman.


“It’s a whole new ball game,” said freshman Montgomery County Sen. Mike Lenett, who introduced the latest version of a statewide assault weapons ban this week.

“We’ve got a lot of new people ... we have a great new governor who has stated his position in favor of an assault weapons ban. I don’t believe you should ever give up.”

Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee Chairman Brian Frosh, D-Montgomery, said the five new members of his committee could make all the difference for an assault weapons ban.

The proposal died in the Senate in 2004 by a 6-5 vote that was decided by former Prince George’s County Sen. John Giannetti, who lost his bid for re-election in November.

“I’m for it. There’s no reason in the world why people need to have these guns on the streets,” Frosh said.

Sen. Robert Garagiola, D-Montgomery, who was the lead sponsor of the bill in 2004, said he chose not to pick it up again this year in part because he has been moved to the Senate Finance Committee.

Garagiola said even with the departure of Giannetti, the bill is still a “very, very difficult” political sell.

“This state is a conservative state overall :confused: , and ... there are many aspects of the state where there are just stronger Second Amendment sentiments,” he said.

“But I think a line needs to be drawn somewhere. These don’t need to be available for the public.”

“It’s the responsibility of every public representative to lead their constituents,” Lenett said.

“I recognize that the Second Amendment provides some gun ownership rights, and I wouldn’t infringe on those. But I don’t believe that any self-respecting hunter needs a military-style assault weapon. I think what occurred with Giannetti — where he was defeated for his position against this extremely popular gun control measure — is in the back of everyone’s minds.”

[email protected]

The Bal Examiner ran an earlier piece last week when the bill was introduced:

Assault weapons ban introduced to state Senate again

Len Lazarick, The Examiner
Jan 19, 2007 3:00 AM (3 days ago)
Current rank: # 607 of 14,591 articles

Annapolis - A freshman senator with close to half the Senate as co-sponsors has reintroduced a bill to ban assault weapons in Maryland.


Montgomery County Sen. Mike Lenett said he had a hand in passage of the federal assault weapons ban when he was counsel to the U.S. Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee. That federal ban has since expired and “it’s up to the states” to pass their own bans, he said.

“I know that bill was extremely effective,” Lenett said, and it “makes good common sense.”

Among the Senate co-sponsors are the chair and vice chair of the Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee that will hear the bill, and the person who may be the only senator to face an automatic weapon on the street, Howard County Sen. James Robey.

Robey is a former policeman who said in the 1970s, he disarmed a man wielding an AK-47 and holding a hostage at a North Laurel apartment complex.

Different sponsors have introduced the bill in the House of Delegates for at least the last four years. The bill was introduced but withdrawn in 2005.

In 2004, the proposal was introduced in both the House and the Senate but was voted down by the Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee.

[email protected]

In the meantime, the brand new MoCo delegate Roger Manno from Dist 19 (another Ceasefire puppet) has introduced yet another attack on the already struggling MD preeption law. From today's DC Examiner:

Bill would toughen Montgomery’s gun laws

Dena Levitz, The Examiner
Jan 22, 2007 3:00 AM (7 hrs ago)
Current rank: # 445 of 14,955 articles

Montgomery County - Just as some local leaders hope to do with campaign finance rules, legislators for Montgomery County want to make it possible for the county to enact stricter gun control laws than what the state has in place.


State Del. Roger Manno, D-District 19, just introduced a late-filed bill in Annapolis that would give Montgomery County an exemption to strengthen rules about firearms if they saw fit to do so.

“In essence it’s to allow the Montgomery County Council to enact whatever legislation they see fit,” he said. “There are unique challenges in Montgomery County with regard to guns — we had the horrific events of the sniper and just a few weeks ago an armored car was shot up. Gun violence is on the rise. So this would give the executive and the council another tool in their toolbox to be able to address these challenges.”

Del. Manno said, in putting forth the enabling legislation, he’s not advocating for any specific increases to the gun control laws, only to allow local leaders to have the power to take action.

It’s the same line of thinking County Council member Phil Andrews is employing in trying to get lawmakers to pass a bill allowing county governments to ratchet up their campaign rules. The one difference is that Del. Manno wants his firearms exemption to merely apply to Montgomery.

“I would not try to tell Howard County how they should handle firearms legislation, which is why this is merely a local bill,” the freshman delegate told The Examiner.

Because Del. Manno filed the bill well after the deadline for a guaranteed hearing in Rockville, it will have to be accepted by two-thirds of the Montgomery County delegation in order to move forward.

If that happens — which it could this week — the delegate said he’ll request a hearing about the bill to take place in Annapolis.

In Maryland, to legally own a gun it must be purchased from a Federal Firearms Licensee and the owner must pass a federal background check.

Montgomery County Police started up a special unit devoted to firearms in January 2003 following the sniper attacks. In October of 2006, that unit collected its 1,000th illegal firearm.

[email protected]

The LTE address for both the Baltimore and DC Examiner papers is [email protected]
 
IMHO the strongest argument for civilian semi autos in Maryland is this:

CONSTITUTION OF MARYLAND

ARTICLE IX

MILITIA AND MILITARY AFFAIRS.

SECTION 1. The General Assembly shall make, from time to time, such provisions for organizing, equipping and disciplining the Militia, as the exigency may require, and pass such Laws to promote Volunteer Militia organizations as may afford them effectual encouragement.


Montgomery County Code:

Sec. 2-15. Same-Arms and ammunition; civilian defense personnel; regulations, etc.

In order to carry out the provisions of sections 2-14 through 2-16 of this Code, the county executive may provide and furnish arms and ammunition to the citizens of the County or to the militia of the state, and may provide and furnish any or all persons engaged in public defense within the county with protective armor and such other equipment and supplies and also purchase, rent, hire and maintain lands, buildings, and equipment as may be considered to be necessary and proper. The county executive may engage the service of persons charged with assisting in public defense and may, with the approval of the council, fix the compensation of such persons, including the payment for services heretofore rendered in connection with the civilian defense activities of the county, and may do all other things needful and necessary to protect and safeguard the people and property within the county from actual or threatened armed invasion or insurrection, and may alleviate their suffering resulting from fire, flood, disaster or epidemic of disease, or other such emergencies. The county executive is authorized to adopt regulations under method (2) of section 2A-15 of this Code to protect the citizens of the county during blackouts, practice air raid alarms, air raids and invasion. All acts done and all money expended by the county for such purposes, either heretofore or hereafter, including the purchase of equipment for civilian defense organization and maintenance, the employment of administrative and technical aid in the interest of civilian defense, the purchase of medical supplies for casualty stations, and the purchase of arms, ammunition and providing and furnishing of telephone service and other service and supplies are hereby ratified and confirmed as just and lawful acts of the county. (Mont. Co. Code 1965, § 2-20; 1943, ch. 75, § 2; 1970 L.M.C., ch. 9, § 2; 1984 L.M.C., ch. 24, § 4; 1984 L.M.C., ch. 27, § 5.)

So, Ike Leggett now has the power to issue me "Same-Arms".

Thats not a semi auto Bushmaster, thats a fully automatic Fn or Colt M-4.

It would be "effective" if most of us already knew the manual of arms.
Maybe they could "promote" FA day at the Associated Gun Club.

;)


Archives of Maryland Online, Volume 409, Page 616
State Papers and Addresses of Governor Herbert L. O’Conor
MARYLAND MINUTE MEN
RADIO STATION WFBR AND MARYLAND COVERAGE NETWORK
March 10, 1942
Baltimore

THE sincere hope of every person in Maryland is that our State may never experience invasion or attack. That we should consider such a thing as possible is in itself a terrible shock to the American state of mind. Nevertheless, with so much of the world overrun by the enemies of Democracy, and with the invasion of Java and New Guinea as well as other points in the Australian Archipelago fresh in our minds, we would be foolish, indeed, not to be prepared, as completely as possible, for any such happening, even here in Maryland.

Our people didn't want this war and, prior to the dastardly and cowardly attack on Pearl Harbor, the thought of sending American troops to fight in far-away lands was abhorrent to the minds of every American. Recent developments of the most threatening nature, however, have completely changed America's attitude toward the present conflict. The unexpected and continuing success of the Japanese forces, who have swept everything before them except General MacArthur's heroic band in the Philippines, have impressed on our minds most forcibly that new tactics are demanded.

That is why, in the recent past, there has become evident a tremendous demand on the part of Americans everywhere, that our leaders forsake a defensive policy and pursue this war in typical American fashion by carrying the offensive to the enemy at every possible point.

But this plan, if adopted, will make necessary additional protective forces in the states of our Country, particularly those like Maryland, situated along the coastlines. It is about this matter of necessity that I desire to speak to the people of Maryland tonight.

Let us review briefly the various steps, and then consider why and to what extent Maryland confronted with danger and what we must do at once to protect our citizens. The Federal Government faces the tremendous task of training the largest military and naval establishment in our Nation's history. After the hundreds of thousands, and even millions, of our men are trained and equipped, they must be transported, far and wide, over the seven seas to overcome the enemy outside continental United States. Every available man in the combat forces will be needed in this far-flung offensive. This means that if any number of soldiers, trained for military operations, would be retained within the United States for guard duty, or for any other routine defense purpose, that would entail a loss to our Country's striking power.

The Federal Government, of course, is the one which assumes the responsibility for the conduct of war. But the State Government has its obligation, also, to its citizens. That obligation includes protection to our people. It was for this reason that more than a year ago I asked the Maryland General Assembly to authorize the creation of the State Guard, the primary purpose of which was to have a mobile protective force ready to move in any direction to maintain the safety and security of our people and their property. It is with pleasure that I can report to our people that the State Guard is completely drilling.

The State Guard numbers approximately 2, 700 officers and men. Supplementing it is a Special Military Police Force, the members of which are on continuous duty and assigned exclusively to the guarding of our State's bridges, important water supplies, and other vital points, described by the War Department as having important bearing on the war effort. The number of this force is approximately 300.

To the credit of the members of our present Guard, it can be said that they have responded to every requirement since our Nation entered the war, despite unexpected difficulties under which they have at times been required to perform their duties. The public will understand that up until now the State's defensive efforts have consisted mainly in protecting those installations and locations which the War Department consider as vitally important.

Now, however, a greater possible danger must be faced by our people. Situated as we are and exposed as our State is, we must be prepared f or the worst. Since the outbreak of hostilities at Pearl Harbor, I have been in touch, at regular intervals, with United States officials who have imparted information revealing the danger that besets us. I owe it to the people of the State to report that we are in jeopardy, and that we must be prepared for trouble both from without and from within our State.

Only today, for instance, have I been advised by the Commanding General of the First Army, in New York, that the presence and increasing activity of enemy submarines off the Maryland Coast require additional drastic measures.

With the prospect that the regular Army units will be engaged in more important operations elsewhere, and with our State Guard and Military Police assigned to particular functions, it is felt absolutely necessary to have an additional protective force—: as a home guard—for the protection of our various communities. Competent military officers, one of whom, our capable and experienced Major General Milton A. Reckord, will speak to you in a few minutes, advise that there is need of this further, wide-spread, alert defense organization to cope with and to be available instantly for any sudden attack by parachute troops, by forces landed from the sea by enemy sympathizers within our State.

I propose to meet this need by the organization in every part of the State of a Reserve Militia. The completed plan has just been approved by General Reckord, as Commander of the Third Army Corps. It offers the opportunity for every able-bodied man to assist in protecting his home and his community against enemy activities. The militia will be organized under our State Law, and the men who enlist at this time of our grave emergency will be known as the "Maryland Minute Men. "

The mission of the Maryland Minute Men is to furnish immediately, local protection against parachute troops, saboteurs, or organized raiding parties. It is planned that the units be confined to their own communities so that there will be assurance at all times that every residential section of Maryland will have protection.

No prescribed complete uniform will be required. Distinctive arm bands and caps or other items may be furnished by the State, the County, or by the men themselves. For the present the hard-pressed Ordinance Department of the United States Army cannot be expected to furnish sufficient arms, ammunition, or equipment. Hence, the volunteers, for the most part, will be expected to furnish their own weapons. For this reason, gunners (of whom there are 60, 000 licensed in Maryland), members of Rod and Gun Clubs, of Trap Shooting and similar organizations, will be expected to constitute a part of this new military organization.

Officers will be drawn from the immediate area in which they are to serve. As Army officers have pointed out to me, the familiarity of the members with their particular locality, with the terrain and road not in the respective communities, will be of great value in resisting any hostile efforts against residential areas and important public necessities.

No intensive training program will be adopted. While sufficient preparatory work must be undertaken by the Minute Men, care will be taken to avoid unnecessary demands1 upon their time. No guard duty is to be included as a regular part of the program for the new force.

Retired officers of the regular Army, Marine Corps or State Guard will be sought to supervise the training. The program will embrace basic field training and basic small arms instruction. The field training will include the study of terrain from the military viewpoint, establishment and maintenance of communications, practice assemblies in daylight and in dark, and other courses. Arms instructions will cover teaching how to load and unload weapons, examination of weapons as to working order; effective firing positions, special instructions in sighting and aiming, rapid firing technique, and other duties.

Military officials, in emphasizing the value of such an organization point out that the familiarity which the members will enjoy with the faces, customs and habits of their neighbors in the community, makes them most valuable in combating sabotage efforts. They will detect, even more quickly than a secret service man from the outside, any strange faces in the community, or any unusual activities on the part of local inhabitants.

The Maryland Minute Men, armed with weapons with which they are thoroughly familiar from long use, operating in a community in which they are accustomed to every road and trail and stream, and aroused to fighting pitch by the knowledge that they are serving to protect their own homes, their family and all that they hold dear in life, will prove a staunch defense against any enemy activity.

Through conferences among the Military, Naval, State Guard and Minute Men officials, operation plans for each area will be carefully prepared, I am assured by the Third Corps Headquarters. Surveys will be made to determine the importance of facilities and installations which might be subjected to sabotage and raids; the availability of Military and Naval police and State Guard forces; and the quality and type of communications which are available for notification for additional protective forces when necessary.

Based on these surveys, definite missions will be assigned each of the organizations concerned; and the proper liaison will be arranged. All available firearms will be reported and those individuals to be armed with rifles will be assigned to tasks where the long-range and1 accurate fire of rifles will be necessarily employed. Those to be armed with shot guns will be assigned tasks where the short range, spreading fire of shot guns will be most effective.
As I attempted to outline before, no unnecessary discipline and training will be required. However, as this is serious business there will be exacted from all members obedience to orders, sobriety, and self-sacrifice. Military advisors suggest that time need not be spent on close-order or other military drill. It is not intended that this be a parade organization. But officers and men must be willing to cooperate and to devote time and work to meet any local situation.
I should also point out another cardinal rule of the new organization. We all know that an enemy raiding party does not stop to give considerations to a victim's social background, or to his political affiliation, or to class distinction. Therefore, I give assurance that such considerations will completely absent from the organization, training and discipline of the Maryland Minute Men from top to bottom.

I now issue a call for volunteers to serve as Maryland Minute Men. Arrangements have been made to accept enlistments at once. State headquarters for the new organization will be the Office of the Adjutant General of Maryland, Fifth Regiment Armory, Baltimore. However, persons can make known their readiness to serve at any of the State Armories, one of which is located in all the counties of Maryland except five. In these five counties; where no armories exists, namely, Garrett, Howard, St. Mary's, Calvert and Charles Counties, other headquarters will be established, the location of which will be made known through the local press.

Already arrangements are made to receive group enlistments from the membership rolls of Rifle Clubs, Trap Shooting Associations, Skeet Clubs and sportsmen's groups of every type. The number of units to be formed in different sections of the State will depend upon the size and population of the area and also upon the important public facilities and military objectives, which are designated by the War Department in different sections of our State.
I wish to repeat that in every move, with respect to this organization, the advice and direction of Army officials will be sought, as has been the practice in connection with the organization and functioning of the Maryland State Guard.

And so, my fellow-Marylanders, I ask your support and assistance in this new undertaking which will be maintained at a minimum of expense. It will however, represent a maximum of protection by civilian soldiers, whose first duty it will be to stand in defense of their home, in protection of plants and facilities which are essential to life.

To these men, many of whom will be veterans of the last war, who incidentally may have "chafed at the bit" when they have observed their sons and younger men marching away recently to the Country's defense, let me say that here is an opportunity that will make them truly an important part of the public defense forces. Here is a function of military organizations to which they can address themselves with enthusiasm, because it will be of utmost importance and will thereby release a number of regular Army forces for combat service abroad.

Inconvenient, yes; overtime work, yes. But let us remember that hardships and privations are now being suffered for us by General MacArthur and his valiant men in Bataan. Those who do not leave United States as a part of the armed forces to avenge the wrong done to Americans and to the United States flag abroad, will be untrue to these American boys if we do not protect their homes and their communities while they are away fighting for us. Let us preserve the communities and their firesides, so that there will be a familiar place to which they will be welcomed on their return after victory has, been won.

The flower of America's young manhood now being sent to distant parts of the world will face the period of hardship and discouragement. But like the Crusaders of old, they are privileged to fare forth to free a land of civilization from the Barbarians.

America's Crusade today is to wipe the scourge of slavery from a world of Hitler and the Japanese war lords, and to establish once and for all time the freedom of man and his dignity as an individual, and this should awaken a responsive chord in every heart.

No, we didn't want this war. We went to all lengths to avoid it. And in so doing we laid ourselves open to just the very reverses that lack of preparedness has occasioned. Now that we are in this war, however, now that we know how necessary it is to fight as we have never fought before, not only to defend our Democracy, our own freedom, but to bring back freedom to all the enslaved people of the earth, we know America shall not fail. Maryland today, as in every other crisis in our Nation's; history, pledges itself to stop short of nothing to preserve American ideals and American privileges for generations to come.
 
“I would not try to tell Howard County how they should handle firearms legislation, which is why this is merely a local bill,” the freshman delegate told The Examiner.
Am I the only one who thinks it's more like: "If we get more gun control at the state level, I wouldn't want Howard County to be able to liberalize their laws":banghead:
 
Ending the pre-emption law would HELP the folks in counties outside of Montgomery, PG and Baltimore City. Most of MD is pro-gun outside of those jurisdictions.

Naturally, they would end the pre-emption bill by saying that no county could pass a law LESS restrictive than the state.
 
Looks like I'll have to write an additional letter to Frosh and Lennet dissecting their anti-American views on how the world should work.
 
I have a check in the mail to the NRA as of reading this. Is there a local Maryland NRA rep to take the point on this?
 
Last edited:
I have a check in the mail to the NRA as of reading this. Is there a local Maryland NRA rep to take the point on this?

NRA rep helping MD gun owners? hahahaha......don't hold your breath. We're on our own, Wayne LaPierre isn't going to come in on a white horse to save us. If we are going to beat this thing, it will not be because of the NRA. It will be because individual gun owners got off of their duffs and fought it.
 
letter to Gazette sent . . .Examiner next

I fear I may have gotten carried away and I forgot Spot77's LTE advice about sticking to just one or two points. Oh, well . . .(cut-n-paste seems to screw up the formatting)

Sen. Lenett's wild claims in support of his proposed ban on so-called
"assault weapons" would be hilarious if not for the gravity of his
extremist legislation. Or his misstatement of Constitutional law, something
that is shocking coming from an elected official.

Despite Lenett's claims, his bill is much broader than the 1994 federal
ban, and will be the most stringent firearm ban of any state in the
country, save Washington, D.C. The opposite of narrowly tailored, Lenett's bill breathtakingly seeks to ban virtually all handguns sold in Maryland, as
well as the most popular target-shooting rifles in the nation.
Contrary to Lenett's claims, these to-be-banned firearms are no more dangerous
than the few semi-automatic firearms spared from his ban. In fact,
there is no functional difference in firepower between these banned and
non-banned weapons; all types of semi-auto firearms require one pull of
the trigger to fire one, and only one, round of ammunition. These are
definitely not machine guns, and it is ridiculous to assert that they
"can spray bullets."

FBI statistics for 2005 show that Marylanders are about as likely to be
beaten to death (18 victims), twice as likely to be bludgeoned to death
(47 victims) or be more than three times as likely to be stabbed to
death (68 victims), than be killed with any kind of rifle or shotgun
(19 victims total). (Data is from
http://www.fbi.gov/ucr/05cius/data/table_20.html)

Lenett is wrong when he alludes that Second Amendment may have something to do with hunting. The weight of independent legal and historical scholarship over the past fifteen years has firmly concluded that the Second and Fourteenth Amendments to the US Constitution protect a personal right to individual firearms ownership for self protection. Since fully automatic machine guns are considered to be crew-maintained "ordnance," and not individual firearms, they are not even relevant to the discussion of those Amendments, regardless of the attempts of the ban's supporters to blur the distinction between fully automatic and semi-automatic firearms (as evidenced by statements in the article).

Lennett's misguided bill should just be rejected.
 
Good letter K-Romulus. I don't think it meanders at all. You packed a lot of statements into a concise document.
 
John Josselyn of the Associated Gun Clubs of Baltimore has suggested that all of us send the sponsors of the bill a freedom of information act request for the information that they are basing SB 43 on. The sample letter that he included with his email is quite good and if a lot of us send them to each senator, they should be very busy answering them. By law they have thirty days to respond. If anyone wants the email, PM me. :evil:
 
Great letter K-Rom......

If I were more literate, I would have written the exact same thing.

While it may be long in word count, the subject matter is dead on and never vears off topc. And the references included give it the credibility it deserves.
 
The problem is the ninnies
that don't want "assault rifles"
really don't want any guns at all.

The only argument they could understand
might be based on maintaining adequate civil defense
in time of terrorism and war.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top