Popular Science does a "How-To" Piece on the Sig 556

Status
Not open for further replies.

thegriz

Member
Joined
Aug 8, 2006
Messages
295
Pop Sci has an article in the most recent issue (and online) about how wonderful the Sig 556 is and how it works. I only glanced at it so far but didn't see any anti comments.

The question for those of you who know about these things is did they get their facts right?

The link has photos, an interactive diagram and a few additional details.

http://www.time4.com/time4/microsites/popsci/howitworks/sig556_rifle.html

By Eric Adams; Photograph by John B. Carnett

WHAT HAPPENS WHEN YOU FIRE?

1. The shooter pulls the two-stage trigger, which releases a heavy, spring-loaded hammer. (The first stage is a resistance point, the second is firing. Less motion to actually fire helps the shooter precisely gauge when the shot will go off.)

2. The hammer strikes a firing pin, which rams the back of the bullet in the chamber—in this case, a 5.56 NATO or .223-caliber cartridge, both common, inexpensive rounds for hunting, military, and police purposes.

3. The impact ignites a chemical mixture—called a primer compound—inside the cartridge, causing the gunpowder to burn rapidly and increasing pressure inside the cartridge until it forces the bullet down the barrel.

4. High-pressure gas from the burned gunpowder vents through a hole in the top of the barrel, through the gas valve and into the gas tube.

5. The gas pushes the operating rod rearward, which in turn knocks the bolt carrier backward. This rotates and unlocks the bolt from the barrel so the spent cartridge can be ejected and replaced with a fresh round.

6. The bolt carrrier’s movement triggers an extractor to grab the rim of the spent cartridge and pull it against an ejector (a small bump inside the receiver), which hurls the case out of the bolt. The same rearward motion also recocks the hammer.

7. A recoil spring in the gas tube brings the operating rod back to its resting position, pulling the bolt back. The bolt pulls another bullet from the magazine and slides it into place for the next shot. A cam rotates the bolt to lock and seal the cartridge in the chamber.

8. If the rifle has a fully automatic mode—civilian competition-shooting versions do not—a single squeeze of the trigger allows this process to repeat uninterrupted, at up to 900 rounds per minute, until the bullets are gone.
 
I don't understand this paragraph on the page.

The SIG is one of the few rifles in the world with a gas piston system, which prevents debris from low-quality ammunition or the environment from getting into the receiver assembly. Its adjustable valve increases gas pressure in the system, which also helps to clear debris.

Don't most auto rifles, besides the M16 use gas pistons?
 
It also says that the flash suppressor "Diminishes brightness to help conceal the shooter's position." :rolleyes:

Where have I heard that before? Hmm...
 
my understanding is that typically AR style rifles don't have gas pistons.

I could be wrong...
 
Don't most auto rifles, besides the M16 use gas pistons?

Some gas rifles, including the M16/AR have a direct gas inpingement system that blows the gas directly back onto the bolt area, i.e.- it defacates where it eats. Gas piston systems have the gas pushing on a piston, which then uses a rod to operate the bolt. More cleaner. Some newer AR uppers are using them now.
Edit: now that I re-read what you said, that's not what you were asking, lol! Yeah I think most autos like the M14, AK, etc. use pistons.

Did the civvie SIG 55X ever make it to the U.S. or are people still waiting? Not that I could probably afford one anyway.
 
Popular Science is basically the only mainstream pro gun magazine around. I remember seeing Smith and Wesson ads in there a while back, and an article about the AWB not doing anything about crime. They also usually talk about the newest guns around, too. They look at guns as they are, mechanical objects.
 
Remember, campers...

The anti-gun position is that if a mainstream magazine gets a single tiny bit of information incorrect, or uses a trite phrase in a way we disagree with, we should boycott them and all their advertisers.

The pro-gun position is that we welcome them to do it again...
 
my understanding is that typically AR style rifles don't have gas pistons.

I could be wrong...

DS Arms has the GTC coming to the market. The conversions are pretty expensive for an AR15 but the benefits are there.
 
Popular Science is basically the only mainstream pro gun magazine around. I remember seeing Smith and Wesson ads in there a while back, and an article about the AWB not doing anything about crime. They also usually talk about the newest guns around, too. They look at guns as they are, mechanical objects.
You may be thinking of Popular Mechanics? In my observation, PopSci is neutral to slightly anti, but hopefully that is changing.

Glad to hear about the article. I may have to head out and pick up the issue...

Regarding the gas piston thing, yes, gas pistons are the rule, not the exception. The AR-15 and derivatives, including the M16, use direct impingement, but most gas-operated self-loaders and automatics are piston guns, including the SKS, AK, FAL, M14/M1A, M1 Garand, M1 carbine, etc.
 
Patriot Arms also has out a complete Ar15 piston upper thats been getting pretty good reviews.

I wonder how much the use of a piston would sacrifice the inherent accuracy of the AR15 platform? I personally like the AR15 platform as a long-range shooter, since I'm not using it as my MBR (and can thereby sacrifice a bit of reliability(

Nick
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top