Well said, Jaenak.
As for "illegal immigrants," who are they harming, merely by coming here and working? Does the mere fact that their presence is not officially endorsed by the either Small or Large Governments make them immoral? They come to work. Welfare? Healthcare? Is that what I hear you thinking? Nobody should get welfare. A red-blooded American has no more right to anyone else's money for his food and health needs than any immigrant, legal or not. Your issue is not with immigrants, it is with the welfare system. I applaud you for your detesation of socialistic wealth-redistribution systems. Now leave the immigrants alone.
Marijuana? 57,000 people die every year in car accidents, many due to abuse of alcohol, and you would like to ban marijuana? You want to prohibit the use of a drug that is abused as much as alcohol, but far less dangerous. I understand. I understand that you want to do it merely because you were dutifully taught by the state, the media, and perhaps your parents, that getting sloshed out of your gourd is totally morally fine, but Satan himself was the inventor and apostle of getting stoned out of your skull with any other chemical.
I have never been drunk, nor do I ever intend to be drunk. Nor have I ever used any non-prescribed, FDA-unapproved pharmaceuticals. But there is a gross logical disconnect in saying that a person may have 200 fifths of whiskey in his basement, but must go to prison for having 2 pounds of marijuana.
I believe that the person who steeped a representation of Christ is a blasphemous lowlife with zero taste or class. I also believe it is not the role of any government instituted by Man to uphold the laws of God. A government (volitionally-funded, of course) may only enforce the rights of men. Namely, life, liberty, and property. The tasteless clown of an "artist" has violated none of these rights of man. God has his law, which he will enforce. Men should stick to enforcing the rights of men.
-Sans Authoritas