• You are using the old Black Responsive theme. We have installed a new dark theme for you, called UI.X. This will work better with the new upgrade of our software. You can select it at the bottom of any page.

Weird new shotgun from Beretta...

Status
Not open for further replies.
That is weird.

Though, I could see some one using one in the Olympics, it has that kind of look to it.
 
It's not totally new. It's been in their catalog for 2 or 3 years now but I've never seen one. It's supposed to combine the recoil dampening benefits of a auto-loader with the feel and handling of an O/U. You manually load the first shell into the chamber and it autoloads the second shell.

I'd like to shoot one sometime just to see how it handles. But, personally, I think Beretta tried to reach a bridge too far with this one. Got to give 'em credit for being innovative though.
-
 
But, personally, I think Beretta tried to reach a bridge too far with this one. Got to give 'em credit for being innovative though.

+1 Not quite ready for prime time.
 
I have to admit that it seems to be pretty innovative.

My question is, can you manufacture something like that to fire belted ammo? :evil:
 
Browning used to make a 2-shot auto. I work with a guy who has one. Still uses it.

If you've ever used an auto for clay shooting, chances are you loaded it with 1 or 2 rounds, but it was a bit of a PITA. This gun is designed to offer someone who likes a semi (perhaps due to lower perceived recoil, perhaps because all rounds go through the same barrel so they hit the same exact spot) the convenient loading of an O/U, and the safety of a break-action (required for some uses).

It's really no weirder than a single-shot American trap gun, which is useless for anything else, even trap doubles, and the UGB25 good for a lot more (pretty much anything that happens at the range: both kinds of trap, skeet, SC).

I like my O/U, but if I were really into semiautos, I suppose it might be interesting. A semiauto is my least-favorite firearm due to cleaning and maintenance issues, but if I had someone else to clean it for me and pick up my hulls... :)
 
and the safety of a break-action
If you read the literature that seems to be the primary goal... break-action so it LOOKS safer to other shooters. And because they can. And some rich dude will buy one. :D
 
break-action so it LOOKS safer to other shooters

Uh, when it's open, it IS safer. If you've never seen a loaded shotgun that was supposed to be unloaded, you haven't been around a range much.

Regardless, break-actions, kept open when not immediately in use, are required for some uses, and not only at target ranges. If you're shooting #8 100 yards away or more, I don't care what you do. But closer, I want to see that the gun's not loaded. I don't expect you to trust me, and I don't inherently trust others either.
 
this thing is designed for bunker, olympic, international trap shooting where two things come into play. First, a lot of those games allow more than one shot per clay, and Second, they have very strict rules on gun handling when moving between stations.


I'd love to play with one here in the states and see how well it performs. I love the break open action of an O/U and I like the idea of an auto-kind of recoil reduction.

Problem is (for me at least) is that it's way overpriced. At about $3500 USD I'd rather buy a quality O/U for trap and doubles.
 
Ok, I like the gun.

It is refreshing to see a company pushing the envelope in innovative design. Almost all new technology looks strange at first.

I agree with huckster, but want to add things like dove hunts in Argentina. If I had a low recoil, lighter, cleaner, fast reloading shotgun it would have made the last trip just a little better (not that it was not great anyway). The O/U got heavy, and the recoil got tiresome after a few hours.
 
This is a gun designed for the semi-auto shooter in a gun banned country like Austrailia which has banned pumps and semiautos...
 
This is a gun designed for the semi-auto shooter in a gun banned country like Austrailia which has banned pumps and semiautos...

thats not what the VP of Beretta said when going over the gun with Tom from Guntalk... do you have a source for that? I suppose its a possible solution, but to design a $3500 shotgun for use in a scant few countries?
 
Definitely not designed for Olympic trap. You want two separate chokes.

I'd guess the main market would be the USA, since we are probably the biggest users of shotgun autos.

Certainly safer, but!
 
thats not what the VP of Beretta said when going over the gun with Tom from Guntalk.

So what did the guy say?

It looks to me like a classic case of a solution to a non-existent problem. But then, I'm not a trap shooter so maybe there is a need for such an odd looking beast.
-
 
That is a competition gun pure and simple. It reminds me of competition .22's out there that really look odd. It's an expensive race gun not intended for hunting.

Ash
 
Average Shooter nailed it:
My question is, can you manufacture something like that to fire belted ammo?

My first thought was:
"I bet I could machine that little doohickey off there and install a drum or belt feed for that thing.

alimentazione_laterale_02.jpg

provided that was legal in my jurisdiction, of course.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top