US Made: Is the AR ban proof?

Status
Not open for further replies.

no_problem

Member
Joined
Apr 22, 2006
Messages
342
Is the AR platform ban proof? That is, will it always be around in some form or another because it is an American made product?

But not the AR. The AR has seen the platform neutered, magazine capacity cut, bayonet lug shaved, flash hiders rebranded...but never taken off the market. Lots of imported guns like the MAK90, and AUG were banned from importation. their availability dried out in the marketplace.
 
I can't see how it is ban proof. Wording could be put into a bill specifically banning semi-automatic firearms as a whole. It is "ban unlikely" I hope.
 
I hear by present to you the American made AUG:

stg_556od.jpg


Anyhow, I think your premise is flawed.
HR1022 would have killed the AR as we know it.

-T
 
Straight-pull AR15s are still available in Britain.

They won't ban AR-15s if you don't let them.
 
last i check the M1919, the M14, M4, M16 , M1 Thompson, M2 Carbine, BAR....

those are all US Made. and they got baned in some way or another... never underestimate the power of scu..... politicians.
 
Nothing is ban proof. All that is required to ban an item....any item....is a politician with an agenda, a total disregard for the Constitution and support from enough like minded pollys.
 
Oleg has some excellent posters on this subject.

The answer to the OP's question is, of course, a resounding NO! :what:
 
You couldn't get an AR of any kind between 2000-2006 in CA

we only recently got them back.

they'll take away anything and everything they can.
 
Clue: The founders thought that the 2nd amendment proofed all small arms from banning of any kind.

Some would argue they thought the Second Amendment would protect all arms - including military grade - from being banned. ;)
 
Depends on what you call an AR.

We are playing games here in California, a Colt AR receiver is banned, off list receivers are not, at least yet.

What we can't have is a AR with a pistol grip and ability to have a detachable magazine unless you registered prior to dec 31,1999.

Of course now we have ARs with funny stocks, or the bullet mag release.

A bullet mag release is legal provided you have only a 10 round mag attached, and that bullet mag release still will get you harassed by some cops.

The definition of assault weapons keeps expanding.

In the mid 80's, the anti gunners were targeting the UZI, AK47, Striker 12 and street sweeper shotguns.

When California passed the first assautl weapon's ban, the list had grown to 50 specified guns. ARs and AK's got the monkier of series guns attached to them which allowed more guns to be added to the lists at later dates.

The 1994 Fed AW ban went with the features and most guns were able to be retrofitted to comply.

AB23 was a new AW ban in California that banned guns with one or more military fieatures. They still are arguing over what is a psitol grip.

OF course now the list of banned guns is several hundred.

IF the McCarthy bill ever passes, the next step will be a flat out ban on any semi auto that has the ability to accept a detachable magazine.

Using the logic that only sporting weapons are allowed, they could even push magazine capacity on rifles/shotguns down to 3 to 5 rounds.

The AR platform is taking a licking, but still is ticking, even her in California.
Trouble is it needs help.

A good ruling on "Heller" could help us here in California.

Nicki
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top