No, it's not.Germany in fact paid more in reparations than it received in Marshall Plan money. It isn't hard to look up figures on the Marshall Plan
http://academics.triton.edu/faculty/rconnor/WWII.htmSome consequences of the treaty
Economically
Germany $56 billion in reparations
Receiving loans from US and Britain which allowed payment
US got back only 1/5 of its loans no chance of repayment
http://www.germany-info.org/relaunch/culture/history/marshall.html"To talk about the recovery of Europe and to oppose the recovery of Germany is nonsense. People can have both or they can have neither." George F. Kennan
As we have indicated, that Germany was a Marshall Plan recipient in the first place did not make the other participating countries very happy, but taking economic revenge was simply not a viable alternative. In fact, Germany had already received a large amount of U.S. aid before the Marshall Plan was even conceived: starting almost immediately after the end of the war, the Allied-occupied part of the country received U.S. goods through the GARIOA program (Government and Relief in Occupied Areas), and the value of these goods amounted to around $1.7 billion. So the Marshall Plan aid to Germany, which amounted to about $1.4 billion in the first four years, was not that dramatic in itself. Britain, France and Italy all received a larger slice of the cake (see listing below for the distribution of help to the ERP countries). And yet Germany put the aid to better use than any other country, and today, 50 years later, still continues to benefit directly from the ERP counterpart fund, known after 1953 as the ERP Special Fund.
Would you rather we spend the money on welfare and socialist programs instead?
but I don't think Ron Paul qualifies as an American hating leftist.
Don't worry Jim, there are plenty of us who are paying attention, and you have our full support and gratitude. Everyone over here is constantly bombarded with the negative crap put out by the Liberal media and seditious lying politicians who's only aim is to bring down George Bush regardless of the cost. It's hard for some to see through the s??tstorm and see the good things that are happening. They need to get there heads out of the sand (not to include Jack, who looks dashing in a tux!) and see the "Big Picture" (I didn't say that did I?).well, I'm sitting in Iraq right now. What you don't get from the media is that the people overwhelmingly support us being here and ridding them of Saddam. The infrastructure is shot based upon saddam's looting the country to build his palaces. Those of you so quick to believe anything the media says so long as it is against this administration need to take a chill pill. Don't believe me?? Come over and take a look for yourself. A little restraint in your emotional intelligence may serve you well.
Would you rather we spend the money on welfare and socialist programs instead?