Viht. N110 in .357 Mag: primer choice

Status
Not open for further replies.

txloader22

Member
Joined
Jan 19, 2011
Messages
18
Location
Texas
I finally came across a pound of Vihtavuori N110 powder to work up some 125 and 158 gr. jhp loads with. I've started looking at the data and am finding a lot of discrepancies, both with charge weight, which is to be expected, but also with what type of primer to use.

Vihtavuori's 2006 manual as well as their online data recommend small RIFLE primers in all their .357 mag loads.

Sierra 5th, Hornady 7th, and Lyman 49th all use small pistol magnum with this powder.

Then there's Speer 14, which recommends standard small pistol and even specifically says NOT to use magnum primers with this powder.

Whose data would you go with? Anybody have any experience with N110 in 357? Would love to hear your thoughts...
 
I used standard small pistol primers, but wasn't getting the velocity I thought I should, going by the book, and haven't played with it in .357 any more, yet.
 
Thanks, Walkalong.

Besides the less than expected velocity, how did the load act? Did it burn completely? Any pressure signs?
 
Zero signs of pressure on the primer. Burned clean enough, but left a couple of granules of incompletely burned powder. It definitely needed more powder.

WSP primer and 16.0 Grs N-110 under a 140 Gr XTP with a good crimp gave me an Avg 1266 Avg FPS from a "slow" 6" M-28, and 1192 FPS from a 2 1/2" 686. The ES was 83 & 82 from a small sample (6 shots). That is quite a bit more than expected as I am getting half that or better with N-110 in .44 Mag. 16.0 Grs was slightly compressed.

The Vihtavuori 09 PDF shows

N110 15.7 for 1499 & 7 17.1F for 1647

with a 140 Gr Speer JHP.

It may tighten up and burn completely at around 17, but I haven't tried it yet. I loaded the 140's with AA #9 this time, and have not fired them yet.
 
While working on jhp loads for a lever, followed Speer's recommendation to use small pistol primers. Used Fed 100 primers, and got very close to the velocitys expected. Accuracy was good (at slightly less than the max loads listed) and less blast than the slower powders tried.

Later tried some of the loads in a pistol, and the velocitys were not as high as expected.
 
Vihtavuori's 2006 manual as well as their online data recommend small RIFLE primers in all their .357 mag loads.

For loads in a 10" 357 TC Contender I followed their load data and used small rifle. The loads were extremely accurate and I'll use N110 as my main 357 powder with the TC.

My 44 Mag revolver turned it its best accuracy ever using N110 and large pistol magnum primers.
 
Vihtavuori's 2006 manual as well as their online data recommend small RIFLE primers in all their .357 mag loads.
Which I am going too try.
My 44 Mag revolver turned it its best accuracy ever using N110 and large pistol magnum primers.
Same here. Even better than AA #9.
 
I followed the Viht book and used small *rifle* primers for 357 with N110.

N-110 is my powder of choice for top end loads in my magnum revolvers.
I have found that it will outrun H110/W296, does the job with less flash and blast, is clean and meters well in my Dillon SDB.
If you want to load at less than max, N-110 will back down smoothly into mid range.
It is more expensive, but powder is a small part of overall cost.

These advantages apply to both my 357 and 41 mag revolvers.

Some will question if the rifle primers will be consistently ignited in revolvers.
If your gun has had the springs ligntened, you might need to be concerned.
In my guns, they work fine.

Be safe and have fun !

-steve
 
Glad to hear some have had success with the small rifle primers. Will it matter much which SRP I go with? I've never used them in any pistol loadings. I have Remington 7 1/2's and CCI 400s on hand. Loads will be shot in a GP100 with stock trigger. Not sure if they will ignite reliably or not...

Is there a "soft" small rifle primer that might be best to try?
 
VihtaVuori has specified small pistol primers with its .357 Magnum loadings since 2008 (6th Edition). Interestingly, that same 2008 6th Edition shows an almost universal drop in powder weights from the previous edition in 2006. I'm wondering if they got a new pressure measuring system installed between editions...
 
I followed the Viht book and used small *rifle* primers for 357 with N110.

N-110 is my powder of choice for top end loads in my magnum revolvers.
I have found that it will outrun H110/W296, does the job with less flash and blast, is clean and meters well in my Dillon SDB.
If you want to load at less than max, N-110 will back down smoothly into mid range.
It is more expensive, but powder is a small part of overall cost.

These advantages apply to both my 357 and 41 mag revolvers.

Some will question if the rifle primers will be consistently ignited in revolvers.
If your gun has had the springs ligntened, you might need to be concerned.
In my guns, they work fine.

Be safe and have fun !

-steve
My experience with N110 mirrors yours, only with the .44 magnum. As a bonus, it groups much better.
 
VihtaVuori has specified small pistol primers with its .357 Magnum loadings since 2008 (6th Edition). Interestingly, that same 2008 6th Edition shows an almost universal drop in powder weights from the previous edition in 2006. I'm wondering if they got a new pressure measuring system installed between editions...
Hmm, that is interesting. Their current online data shows small rifle, and I thought the book I was looking at was the most current...but maybe not. A VV manual is about the only one I don't have because their powders really hard to find around here. Probably time to get one...

The data in the book I looked at was the exact same data as what is currently on their website. So you're saying there's a newer manual than that?
 
lapua.com has reloading data. fwiw

just looked at the 2006 reloading data. the only revolver caliber using a small rifle primer is the 357 magnum AND 357 maximum. i think they may have confused magnum and maximum. suggest you use a small PISTOL magnum primer for the 357 magnum.


murf
 
Last edited:
Their 9th edition is here:
http://www.lapua.com/en/home.html

Click Customer Center and select Downloads.

My experience with "hotter than suggested" primers is that often there is little change in average velocity and a marked decrease is the variation of velocity.

IF YOU ARE GOING TO EXPERIMENT WITH THIS, YOU MUST BACK DOWN AND WORK UP AS YOU SHOULD IN ANY LOAD DEVELOPMENT.


I am an amateur hobbiest, not a professional, so take care.

Be safe and have fun !

-steve
 
Hi
I sent V-V an email about the 'sm rifle primer' deal and the rep was quite surprised about this. He said it should have definately been a small pistol primer. He also said that using a mag primer was not necessary or recommended.

I've been doing a little cross comparison and examining some of the 125gr .357 Mag factory loads. So far I haven't been able to duplicate factory velocities in my S&W 4" 686 with any of the powders tried, using the Sierra 125gr JSP. N-110 is among the contestants..

125grSierra357.jpg

It was a rather cold day when I shot this trial. Typically groups and extreme spreads tighten up when the weather gets warmer.
I later shot a group with 18.5grs N-110 and got a velocity of 1323 average when it was a little warmer.

5-1-11.jpg

No pressure signs were noticed, but I'm pretty sure I ran up against the wall with 2400 and Enforcer.
Velocities read with a Oehler Mod 33 at 8' from the muzzle.


Hope this helps some.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top