Why get two 1851s?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Mictlanero

Member
Joined
Nov 13, 2012
Messages
139
Location
Lost Angels
I have a Pietta 1851 Hickok and I am considering to get one more ---- I don't shoot in any organized events or anything like that - but perhaps someday. Is it mostly for collector value, historical correctness or some practical reason people get 2? If I did get another obviously the serial numbers would not be consecutive..... I ask because although I am tempted to get another Hickok to have a set, I also want to save my $ and get one of those sexy stainless 1858s --- what should I do? I have 1 other 36 cal BP --- 1861.

p.s. I am not made of money - it would be nice to get both of course, but not an option at the moment.

Thanks for your advice!
 
Last edited:
When i first dug out my dads gun collection and started shooting them (last november) i never really shot any of his guns. I was concerned about black powder. I heard from a few people at the range i go to that talked about chain fires and he mentioned one guy blew a few fingers off because of an ember that blew back into an empty chamber already fired. He reloaded that chamber with the ember still burning in it and the flask blew up in his hand.

That was enough that i sold a few of them (the best 2 actually) after about 6-7 months i watched a guy at the range and decided to give it a try.

The thing i like to do is take atleast 2 pistols. Ill shoot one and put it up to cool while i load and shoot the second. Before i load the first one again i drop the cylinder out and blow in it before i dump the next load of powder into any of the cylinders.

This was one of the reasons i shoot the quick charge tubes. Incase something happens i would rather one 20 grain load fire insted of a whole flask.

So this could be one reason to get 2
 
BowerR64

It's too bad you listened to those uninformed yahoos about chain fires and someone blowing his fingers off. Yes chain fires are possible; but they are not as dangerous as claimed, and blown up flasks from charging the chambers on a revolver is an old wives tale. It is possible using a single shot rifle or pistol; but not a revolver.

My choice would be to buy the other Hickok & save for the Remmie. If you keep going to the range & shooting them, you'll want more than those eventually.
 
There are very few things in life as satisfying as a cap and ball revolver in each hand, and ringing steel with every shot.
 
THanks for helping me decide to get it - I really like my other one and it will be nice to have a pair of these Hickoks --- well, just like Hickok! plus it is on sale for $249.
 
If you're not made of money and you don't shoot in any events such as Cowboy Action where you NEED a pair I'd say spend your money on something else.... like an 1860 Colt or 1858 Remington instead of a second 1851. Get a little variety in your BP shooting that way.

Besides even in cowboy action it's entirely permissible and fun to use combinations of guns as long as they are of the same type. IE; your Colt 1851 and an 1858 Remington.
 
BowerR64

It's too bad you listened to those uninformed yahoos about chain fires and someone blowing his fingers off. Yes chain fires are possible; but they are not as dangerous as claimed, and blown up flasks from charging the chambers on a revolver is an old wives tale. It is possible using a single shot rifle or pistol; but not a revolver.

My choice would be to buy the other Hickok & save for the Remmie. If you keep going to the range & shooting them, you'll want more than those eventually.
A revolver is what he used. He said it was windy and an ember or something blew back into one of the open chambers already shot on the revolver.

With my luck what can happen will.

IMO its better to be safe the sorry.

I bought a plastic flask with a pre measured spout and right on the package, and on powder i think it says never pour direclty into the chamber from the spout.

I will say ive done it a few times but i wasnt comfortable doing it.

None the less its my reason for 2 guns. you can never have to many right?
 
Last edited:
Bower, for that to happen to the guy he must have grabbed the flask almost the moment he finished shooting and started reloading. Otherwise the short open end of the cylinder would allow enough air to reach that ember that it would burn out darn quickly.

But hey, it only takes a moment to blow in the chamber throats to supply enough oxygen that you ensure it burns out any remaining embers. So what the heck, do it.

Hell, I was somewhat worried about chain fires myself so the first three times out with my first BP revolvers I wore a thin but sturdy deerskin glove to give me SOME protection just in case.
 
Could of been a home made wad? paper cartridges? i dont know all the details but its one of those storys in the back of my mind when im shooting them.

I have another good reason to get more then 1

Set one up for 15 yards and set one up for 50

Use one for shooting at further distances and one for close range.

Ive never shot 2 at the same time but it sure looks fun.

I like to load up 2 or 3 at home - the percussion caps. Then when i get to the range i can shoot alot quicker the first few minutes im there.
 
Thanks! When I wrote the 2nd post above I had just purchased the 2nd 1851 navy Hickok - I really like the look of it, and the engraving - recently I went to the Autry museum and took some pictures of one of Hickok's original 1851s - awesome museum, btw - and I have a membership. Well, one good thing about living in CA.

Definitely I will get that Stainless 1858 - soon hopefully :)
 
I'm a big Remington fan myself, but my very first handgun when I was a youngster [fourteen years old] was a '51 Navy kit my dad helped build, from Navy Arms.
 
"A revolver is what he used. He said it was windy and an ember or something blew back into one of the open chambers already shot on the revolver."??

You'd have to be real fast to get the powder to the chamber before the "ember" went out.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.