New Stick - Ruger Gunsite Scout

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Dec 24, 2002
Messages
9,115
Location
SE PA
So I decided that I needed a new left handed centerfire bolt action rifle. I have plenty of milsurps but the bolts are all on the wrong side for me, so on 3/5 I ordered a LH stainless Ruger Gunsite Scout from Bud's. I picked it up this morning and got it to the range where I put 40 rounds of M-80 Ball through it.

Here it is with an M-1907 sling, the Ruger 10 round metal mag that is standard equipment, and Ruger polymer 5 and 10 round mags.

gsr-3-mags.jpg

I shot the first 10 rounds using the factory rear sight, as pictured above. I then installed an XS rail and zeroed it at 100 yards. Here it is with the XS rail and 5 round mag:

gsr-5-poly.jpg

I like the 5 round poly mag the best. The metal mag is way too long. The polymers feed more smoothly.

The bolt is still stiff but I expect it to break in over time. It'll never be as good as a Lee-Enfield, though.

Surprisingly for a Ruger, the trigger was fine out of the box. I'm guessing it's about 4 pounds and crisp, with no creep.

The stock is well designed IMO. I removed the spacer installed at the factory to better fit my short LOP. The recoil pad is good. This is sort of a 21st Century Jungle Carbine but the recoil is nowhere near as vicious.

I can't really speak to accuracy. I didn't have my rifle rest with me, it was in the upper 30s and there were gusts of 20 to 30 MPH, so I was happy to hold the 8 ring on an SR-1 target at 100 yards. After I zeroed the ghost ring BUIS on the XS rail, I did manage to ding a torso-sized gong at 200 yards several times.

The reason I installed an XS rail is that I plan to mount a scope in the conventional position, over the receiver. I'm looking at 1-4x options with illuminated reticles. I have a Burris TAC-30 on one of my AR-15s and that's currently a leading contender for the Ruger GSR.

I'm really looking forward to wringing out the GSR once I get some glass on it, and hopefully I'll be able to take a deer with it this fall.
 
Congratulations, she's beautiful. Lots to be said for a laminate stock. Black laminate only adds to its character. No doubt choices are limited for us lefties, but you picked a sweet one.
 
The recoil pad is good. This is sort of a 21st Century Jungle Carbine but the recoil is nowhere near as vicious.

.
I love the looks of the rifle, and I like Ruger guns in general. I had thoughts of buying one, but changed my mind after shooting the one a friend of mine bought. It's a good thing the recoil pad is a good one; I was ready to give it back after 5 rounds. Not because I didn't like it, but just because the light weight doesn't absorb the recoil, and it was beating my shoulder. I guess I just prefer something heavier. I can shoot my M1A all day and not hurt like I did after shooting the GunSite Scout. It's too bad, because otherwise I like the gun.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
It's a good thing the recoil pad is a good one; I was ready to give it back after 5 rounds. Not because I didn't like it, but just because the light weight doesn't absorb the recoil, and it was beating my shoulder.

Yep, the Ruger GSR does punch you. Thanks to that recoil pad it doesn't sting to the bone like a steel buttplate mil-surp bolt action can, or a 12 gauge shotgun with hard buttplate can. My GSR hasn't left a mark on me, like those others can.

Plus, that M1A also spreads out the time of the punch to the shoulder with its semi-auto action compared to a locked up bolt gun.

I can only imagine how much softer a muzzle brake would make shooting a GSR. I'll probably get one in a few more years if I still have a GSR. :)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Nice looking rifle. What can do you have on it? I'm looking at building one on a Form 1 for my GSR.

Re the rear-mounted scope: I wanted to retain a backup iron sight, hence the XS rail. If I didn't care about that then using the rings that Ruger provides would make perfect sense.
 
It's a good thing the recoil pad is a good one; I was ready to give it back after 5 rounds. Not because I didn't like it, but just because the light weight doesn't absorb the recoil, and it was beating my shoulder.


I'm no football player, but I find my RGS pleasant to shoot. What ammo were you using? Sounds like you may have been shooting 180 gr bewlitts. Them're fer huntin', see.

My Ruger Scout likes 147, 150 and 164 gr bo0lits for target shooting. Accurate. Fun. I haven't hunted with this rifle yet.



Congrats on your purchase, Dave!

:)
 
Nice looking rifle. What can do you have on it? I'm looking at building one on a Form 1 for my GSR.

Re the rear-mounted scope: I wanted to retain a backup iron sight, hence the XS rail. If I didn't care about that then using the rings that Ruger provides would make perfect sense.
Can is a YHM Phantom Ti. If I was buying one today I would probably go with the Silencerco Omega.

That makes sense with the XS rail and retaining the rear sight.
 
I really want one of these. Back in high school my friend's dad had one. It was probably the most enjoyable bolt action I've shot! The sock is just so perfect, plus it comes with the spacers to get it just right. The action wasn't smooth or anything, but that was alright. Really light and handy too. Idk. There's definitely more accurate and smoother rifles out there for a lot less money, but the GSR is just so fun!
 
I really like the idea of the GSR, and keep almost buying one. But I don't need another .308, and I still question the decision to not use any of the billions of .308 surplus mags floating around, but make a new one instead.

On the other hand I've been missing a LH polt rifle since about 15 min after I sold my M77, so maybe I'll give in soon. Threads and pictures like these don't help me save money.
 
...I still question the decision to not use any of the billions of .308 surplus mags floating around, but make a new one instead.

Ruger didn't make a new mag. The GSR uses the same mags as Accuracy International rifles, which are a standard in the precision rifle world. They did try to get it working with M-14 mags at first but had reliability issues, and also didn't want to deal with people using any old crappy surplus mag, then come crying to them when the rifle wouldn't feed.

Now, I don't know if they tried any AR-10 or DPMS/SR-25 type mags. The latter would be nice because you can get P-Mags.

It's not really an issue, IMHO. It's a bolt action rifle. I don't need the same number of mags for it that I do with my semiautos.
 
Now, I don't know if they tried any AR-10 or DPMS/SR-25 type mags. The latter would be nice because you can get P-Mags.

My understanding is that the only known way to get AR-15/AR-10 style mags to work reliably with this type of action is to do what Mossberg has done with the MVP rifle, the problem for Ruger being that Mossberg has it patented.
 
Last edited:
I'm no football player, but I find my RGS pleasant to shoot. What ammo were you using? Sounds like you may have been shooting 180 gr bewlitts. Them're fer huntin', see.

I think they were M80 ball; it's whatever the guy who owns it was shooting, looked like a milsurp box of some sort. I had my own handloads for my M1A, they are 168's.

I have a Marlin .308 bolt gun also, with a Boyd's thumbhole stock and LimbSaver pad on it, and shoot 178 and 200 gr handloads from it; even it doesn't hit me like the Ruger did. I think it's the light weight of the Ruger that does it. My Marlin weighs about 8-1/2 pounds.
 
Dave,

I did not know that. I guess that's what I get for listening to gun store workers. Now it'll be even harder to resist one.
 
I think they were M80 ball; it's whatever the guy who owns it was shooting, looked like a milsurp box of some sort. I had my own handloads for my M1A, they are 168's.

I have a Marlin .308 bolt gun also, with a Boyd's thumbhole stock and LimbSaver pad on it, and shoot 178 and 200 gr handloads from it; even it doesn't hit me like the Ruger did. I think it's the light weight of the Ruger that does it. My Marlin weighs about 8-1/2 pounds.


Gotcha.

Maybe it's a fit thing, relative to LOP, or the weird comb of the Ruger stock? Either way, I can see what you mean. Although I enjoy shooting my Scout the way it's set up (two spacers), I have a couple of old H&R single shot break action shotguns that kick like mules. Folks have said it's due to the H&R stock design. I shoot slugs from pump shotguns, so I'm not entirely afraid of recoil, but, jeeze... those H&Rs! Hahaha...

:)
 
I have the GSR and love it

but I got a chance to pick up a Mossberg MVP Scout in 308 a few backs, so I did. I like the fact that the MVP takes AR 10 and M14 mags. I have shot it with both with no feeding problems. I already own an AR 10 so having one mag that works in two rifles is appealing to me. The GSR is a bout a one MOA rifle up to this point . I look forward to developing loads for both and see which shoots better.
 
I have to admit that if I was right handed, or Mossberg made a LH version of their MVP, I would look long and hard at it. Most reviews I've seen from owners have been quite positive, and the Mossberg is noticeably less expensive. But when you're a southpaw, you get used to making do with limited choices.
 
I have the standard blue RH model. I've tried all the mags. Agree the factory ten round metal is the worst. The ten round metal mag that is aftermarket is nice and shorter and I bought a couple. Still... I don't often feel the need to walk around with something that big sticking out of my bolt action rifle. I like carrying a rifle in the woods with my hand wrapped around the receiver. Since I have a Burris Scout scope on it, that works... unless it has a giant mag. I bought all three sizes of the poly mags and they work nice. The little shorty just leaves the bottom part sticking out. But, like the OP, I decided the poly 5 round was the best compromise. Doesn't stick out enough to be annoying and yet that gives me 5+1.

I've never, ever, ever in my life liked the muzzle device Ruger puts on their rifles. So I ripped that baby off early on. I've got Battle Comps on several of my AR's and they make one for .308, so I screwed that one on. I think it looks nice and it does seem to work well as a combo device. I don't find the recoil to be a problem but then I've done a lot of bench work with a Remington 700 in .350 RM. Those 225 grain bullets with a max load of 4064 wear you out from the bench.

Anyway, I like my GSR a lot and highly recommend it for a general utility woods rifle.

Gregg
 
Congrats on buying a great rifle!

I've had one for several years. Removed the stock spacers and flash suppressor, added a Leupold scout scope and Ching sling. I normally use five round magazines either Accurate Mag or Ruger poly. This rifle doesn't need a tac vest full of mags, one in the gun, one in a pocket or pouch and five rounds in a stock sleeve will get a lot of killin done.

Overall for me it fits Col. Cooper's requirement that a Scout rifle be "friendly".

Enjoy!
 
I bought one about a year after they became available. I really like mine! It is very easy to carry & shoots great. I just put a new scope on it & am going to try it out this hunting season. The 5 rd. mag's are nice for hunting, but with the problems that we have around here, I do carry a pouch with 3-10rd.mag's. This rifle fits me well & I have not had a problem with recoil. The trigger is just fine & I think Ruger built a great rifle. This is one of my favorite rifles to shoot.My rifle seems to like the 165 gt.bullets, but I have had no problem with the 180gr.bullets or the lighter 147/150 gr.rd.s yet. The 165gr.loads are what I use the most. Maybe I have just not shot enough of the other loads to see the difference yet. But I am really enjoyed this rifle!
 
The 5 rd. mag's are nice for hunting, but with the problems that we have around here, I do carry a pouch with 3-10rd.mag's.

MJ growers? I don't blame you for carrying a few 10 rounders if things go south.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top