Beretta ARX 100 in 556 NATO design and wear at 500 rounds.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Aug 1, 2005
Messages
4,631
I’ve had this rifle for about 6 weeks and have about 500 rounds through it without any real stoppages, except during a rifle match, when a round popped out of the top of a magazine on a bolt open reload.

Some things that might not be apparent from the pictures:
There is very little aluminum in the design. The picatinny rails, barrel support, and selector/safety are the only aluminum parts on the rifle. Everything else is either steel or plastic.
It’s bulky but light. The rifle is very deep from top to bottom but pretty narrow. Most of the space forward of the mag well is hollow plastic around the barrel, gas cylinder, and forward nose of the bolt carrier.

Rifle with stock folded with sling attached. Finding a way to mount the sling is kinda a pain. The built in sling mounting points are too narrow to work easily with 1” slings. My solution was to use paracord loops to attach to HK hooks. That also helps with noise, is flexible, and is easy to remove.
IMG_0418_zpswocpmu3n.jpg
IMG_0414_zpskrbaoqnx.jpg
IMG_0420_zpsuqy0vzmn.jpg

Rifle field stripped into 3 basic groups: upper receiver, lower receiver, and bolt carrier group.
IMG_0422_zps6mwaflda.jpg

Upper receiver strips down to the barrel and receiver body.
IMG_0425_zpsa2w3v2lu.jpg

Receiver details: Internal rail cuts on receiver. The steel BCG runs on plastic.
IMG_0433_zpszbadooy1.jpg
Receiver from below. I have no clue how they molded all those details at one go.
IMG_0436_zpsh2eqxezz.jpg
Front of receiver/barrel support. The aluminum barrel support has 3 legs that locate it in the plastic upper and a steel insert with sprung fingers that actually contact the barrel at the gas block.
IMG_0431_zps0cqoludm.jpg

Barrel details:
Barrel extension.
IMG_0426_zpsulkqglwe.jpg
IMG_0427_zps5uc091s8.jpg
Bottom of barrel extension with wear from the barrel latch is apparent.
IMG_0429_zpsmmuh1ocx.jpg
Top of barrel extension. The dished out area is clearance for the bolt carrier control pin spring.
IMG_0482_zps0na68s3e.jpg
Detail of the moving gas cylinder and stationary piston. The two spring tabs retain the two caps.
IMG_0428_zpscpkcjzmz.jpg

View into the lower receiver from the top. Visible is the center tab that activates the bolt hold open, the to side pieces that actually hold the bolt open, the green plastic hammer body, the steel hammer, black plastic trigger/sear, disconnector, drop safety, and the take down plate/ejector selector.
IMG_0438_zps6eegkhwb.jpg
 
Last edited:
Bolt carrier assembly in take down position.
IMG_0441_zpsdet9rqr8.jpg

Bolt carrier assembly detail stripped to three main components: Recoil spring with guide rod, CH slot dust cover, and buffer. Bolt carrier with CH. Bolt.
IMG_0443_zpsqimyrci7.jpg

Bolt carrier underside details showing CH in ready position, note control pin in down position.
IMG_0448_zpsfdxd6n8f.jpg

Wear on nose of bolt carrier possibly due to heat.
IMG_0450_zpst1nybtzw.jpg

Assembled bolt detail of top showing Cam/FP retaining pin and slots that control bolt rotation during travel.
IMG_0451_zpsv4lv7njx.jpg
Side view of assembled bolt.
IMG_0452_zpsmkahc2of.jpg
Detail of bolt face showing dual extractors/ejectors.
Bolt stripped showing bolt body, firing pin with spring, Cam/FP retaining pin, and extractors/ejectors.
IMG_0455_zpsefiuhh68.jpg
Bolt face stripped.
IMG_0457_zpsnpzrkb8g.jpg
Stripped bolt side view.
IMG_0458_zpsryzicy72.jpg
Slots for extractor/ejector tabs.
IMG_0459_zpsikic9sfi.jpg
IMG_0460_zpsekiuexoi.jpg

Cam/FP retaining pin. The pin is symmetrical and can be inserted either way.
IMG_0461_zpsdldb0spo.jpg
IMG_0462_zps0h8fdaly.jpg

Extractor/ejector details.
IMG_0466_zps23pp5mq3.jpg
IMG_0469_zpsmgzu5tus.jpg
 
Weight of assembled bolt carrier (335g) and bolt (158g) giving a bolt to bolt carrier weight ratio of 2.1:1. This compares with a AR 15* ratio of 7.1:1* and AK ratio of 4.9:1.
IMG_0471_zpscq0f3mir.jpg
IMG_0472_zpsbkzo0qwt.jpg
*FA bolt carrier with standard carbine buffer.

Detail of control pin/bolt interaction.During stripping of the new cartridge from the magazine, the cam path in the bolt tries to turn the bolt as it encounters resistance. This premature turning action is prevented by the control pin, which sits in a slot on top of the bolt.
IMG_0478_zpsp0qnixbe.jpg
As the bolt approaches the barrel extension the control pin spring hits the barrel extension as the bolt contacts the end of the barrel. The lifting control pin allows the bolt to turn and lock in the barrel extension.
IMG_0477_zpsvykoggse.jpg
The bolt carrier comes to a stop against the barrel extension and the control pin spring allows it to return to the lower resting position.
IMG_0475_zpsabhx59ot.jpg

BSW
 
Very thorough and good overview of the rifle.. Honestly it's people like you that make it extraneous and irrelevant to buy gun mags these days... Thank you for putting such effort into this post!
 
Thanks for the write-up. It's a nifty rifle, but with a street price of ~$1,600, not likely to find it's way into my stable. I don't see an $800 advantage over an AR. If they drop under $1k, I may reconsider.
 
briansmithwins

Thanks for the review and for the excellent photographic depictions.
 
$1200 from Botach right now. Only $300 more than a Colt 6 series...Hmm....
Yeah-I took them up on their offer last time they offered it for $1,195 delivered.
It took them about a month to get it to me - first time I've had a "problem" with Botach, although I will cut 'em a little slack, since they probably oversold them? This was also around the time there were numerous snowstorms along the east cost, and the gun may have come directly from Beretta, which may account for some of the delay?
 
Great pics, Briansmithwins. It's cool how the ARX100 breaks down into self contained modules. Lots of smart engineering.

The captive anti-rotation "control pin" on the bolt carrier is pretty neat and seems simpler than the removable sleeve on the AUG bolt that does the same thing.
 
While different, you can definitely see the engineering similarities with my CX4. Subassemblies and lots of fiber reinforced polymer.
 
Did they change the charging handle? The example I saw (and was dissapointed with) had a tiny, sharp spur of a handle, and a really stiff recoil spring. Your gun looks way nicer at the handle.

TCB
 
Did they change the charging handle? The example I saw (and was dissapointed with) had a tiny, sharp spur of a handle, and a really stiff recoil spring.

I've only seen the one type, which looks like the one I have. For me the ARX is a glove gun, like an AK. The CH is small and it's way too easy to lose skin on the shell deflector running it.

The recoil spring isn't that stiff, but the last fraction of an inch that activates the ejector is kinda tough.

BSW
 
the last fraction of an inch that activates the ejector is kinda tough.
I'll bet that's what I was feeling; makes sense. How has the rifle worn in? My example felt very stiff and rough; really doused my burning desire to buy one, to be frank. The magazine release...essssssss were very stiff and sticky in particular. I also couldn't figure out how to flip the charging handle around just by fiddling with it, which bothered me (I subsequently looked up how to do it, but I wish it was more intuitive)

The overall bulk/weight aspect I actually didn't find bothersome in the least, even though that's what most folks seem to complain about on sight. It's a chunky dude, but that's kind of what a rifle is; it's not a machine pistol, after all. It's big enough to get a good solid purchase on any number of ways, and the size actually helps stiffen it up a bit more than its weight would suggest (soda-straw vs. weed eater cord ;))

TCB
 
I see three obstacles to owning something like this: ugliness, complexity and cost. This isn't the only example out there. Others include $1900 Tavor and $2800 SCARS. I would have hard time spending over $1000 for stuff like this.
 
I see three obstacles to owning something like this: ugliness, complexity and cost. This isn't the only example out there. Others include $1900 Tavor and $2800 SCARS. I would have hard time spending over $1000 for stuff like this.

Doesn't seem that complicated to me although appears to be more complicated than an AR. I don't know much about the Tavor but the SCAR design is even simpler....in my opinion it's a more simple design than even the AR. I can field strip my SCAR 17 even faster than an AR. Also, the $2800 (you can get them for $2600 or so) price would be for a SCAR 17s which is .308 so it's a different animal altogether. The SCAR 16s is a few hundred dollars less than.

Not a ton of options for a .308 battle rifle that are under $1000. I guess you could put together an AR10 using cheap parts and definitely get it under $1000 but you would have to make sacrifices. A KAC SR25 is about $1000 more than a SCAR 17s. A very high end AR can easily hit $2000 without optics if you want top of the line. Everything is relative.
 
I don't know much about the Tavor...
I have both an ARX and Tavor - think I prefer the Tavor, but they are different animals.

Folks that complain about the cost (and I am a cheap SOB) are often comparing apples to oranges.
1. Not that I care to own a piston AR, but when comparing prices, would it not be a closer comparison (pricewise) to compare a Tavor to a piston AR?
2. I thought about getting a SBR, but then I'd have to fill out another "mother may I" form from the ATF in order to carry it across the state line to my gun club. I decided to get a Tavor instead - shorter than a SBR AR-15, don't have to ask the ATF's permission to transport, no $200 tax stamp or ridiculous wait times for said stamp, and much fewer legal issues to deal with.
3. I paid $1,600 for mine - they may be even cheaper these days?

While still pricey, if you compare it to a SBR piston AR + tax stamp, it starts to look like a bargain!?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top