If you're careful, wisconsin, you can probably brush off a safety against your clothing. Is that a good idea? I wouldn't recommend it, but it may be a lesser evil than going unarmed. It would definitely take a fair amount of practice with an unloaded and double-checked gun beforehand.
I've never believed "our insurance company makes us prohibit guns." I've been asking for references to such companies' names and kinds of policies ten years and longer. No one's ever responded with actual information.
I don't ever do business with anti-Second Amendment bigots.
I think that analysis is probably correct, but there are a couple additional factors that ought to be taken into consideration.
There's a difference between recoil and perceived recoil. If the recoil is spread out over time, it's likely to be perceived as lesser than the same raw quantity of...
[sincerity, deep] Show me where it says in that Constitution where it says the commoners have some right to annoy the better people with all this talk of rights they obviously aren't qualified for, or we'd have granted them imaginary rights a long time ago. Now, shut up! [/sincerity]
I'm proud to tell you I helped a guy with a green card qualify for a Colorado Permit to Carry Concealed Handguns. There should have been more, but better one than none.
I'll bet the real reason that conviction was allowed to stand is the powers that be are deathly afraid Aiken will sue for violations of his civil rights.
That'd be my recommendation, too. I've bought dozens of used Colt and Smith & Wesson revolvers over the years. If you're reasonably careful, you shouldn't have a problem.
Any excuse will do, and it's also a distraction from the Obama Depression and high and rising cost of gasoline. Think of it as a two for one propaganda opportunity.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.