Search results for query: *

Actually, preliminary plans for my home call for such a door, but I wouldn't call it an ARSENAL.... more of a walk-in small arms locker... now if you have a DEDICATED, STAND ALONE, BUILDING with steel doors, THAT might be called an arsenal.

Asperger's Syndrome is heavily skewed towards higher IQ's, although that's not absolute. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asperger%27s_syndrome

In that situation, is it appropiate to safe and/or clear the weapon upon discovery? does the fact that it was a school ground change that? I know that gloves and a witness or two would be advisable before touching, but is touching itself taboo?

Hollywood doesn't count. literature, RPG's, and enyclopedias are definitly the way to go for references.

since when are mere penetrating headshots supposed to kill Zombies? the brains are pretty decomposed in the first place! there are three basic ways to disable/kill a zombie. 1. SHATTER major bones and/or joints. (hip, knee, elbow, and shoulder are ideal. Ribcage and spine MIGHT work.)...

Mike, have you documented your training methods? That could be your next publication right there, if you expanded beyond the firing range...

Disclaimer: I am not (yet) a hunter! to my mind, after reading the previous posts, I see six mistakes: 1. Cheney failed to assess the safety tendencies of his (new) hunting buddy. 2. Cheney violated protocol by going after a (second) group of quail before reforming the party. 3...

hmmm... maybe a LITTLE extreme, but a variation might work: "predatory" rape, where no possible misunderstanding between parties could exist: Death penalty. "Date" rape: death penalty on second offense. "Statuatory" Rape: On third offense. must be three distinct victims. murder...

my inexperienced reccomendation: keep the gun pointed at him while you secure the immediate area. (check for accomplices, warn patrons to stay back, get his gun clear of him) then, get into the best position possible. prefferably, you will be clearly visible from the door, you will be able to...

They probably refrained from the tear gas because they considered him more a suicide risk than a danger to others... and they guessed wrong. (or were they right?) we'll find out more.

ok, the CATHOLIC church appears to consider suicide-by-cop as suicide. although a suicidal lay catholic may not be aware of that... http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/14326b.htm doesn't exactly answer the classified information question, though... although it comes close...

That raises an interesting philosophical question.... If you take an action whose logical consequence is death, and you have no reasonable justificication for doing so, is it suicide? there must be all sorts of variations on that pattern... for example, leading the charge against a machine...

I'll have to read up on this 'Bolo' Series. sounds interesting. there's a flaw in their reasoning, though. Two words: STEALTH AIRCRAFT. If you can't find it, you can't shoot it. Also applies to spacecraft and cruise missles. and remember, something like one of these 'bolo' tanks would...

ah, but did they settle the suit because he was right, becuase it was more PC for him to be more right whether he was or not, or because they didn't want him testifying about the private lives of his proctectees? taken individually, each of the relevant facts COULD be true and...

Academically, I reccomend the Giant Schnauzer. Very similiar to german shepherd, and used for a lot of the same purposes by European Police. more wiry coat. SLIGHTLY different temperament, but that's probably just because Schnauzer breeders are more specialized... not as much demand for...

I prefer more advanced challenge-response RFID tags, as opposed to ones that send the same code to any radio source that asks. If I ever get a dog, I'm thinking of having a doggie tunnel next to the front door, activated by an RFID chip under its skin. I'd probably insert a similiar chip...

smurfslayer is almost certainly right. my dream lawsuit is a list of infantry weapons, updated every 40 years, along with the demand that I be allowed to manufacture them. (M4, M16, M14, M1, Breech-loader, rifled muzzleloader, smoothbore muzzleloader) wouldn't be hard. most of those...

federal law has minimum guidelines, and a judge violating them would presumably by impeached/mandated to retire.... was this a state court?

http://www.army.mil/fact_files_site/in_crew.html this looks easier to understand.... the trick appears to be going into the google advanded options and limiting your search to .mil domains. I'll be in and out, don't expect sudden assistance.

http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/army/unit/toe/ not certain how official that is for purposes of court citation, and reading the individual tables makes my head explode... I'd reccomend filing either seperate suits for each issue, or a single suit clearly differentating between each issue,