I like my 10/63 better than my AR.
Added the ATI kit & a short bi-pod which can be used as a vertical grip.
The wood stocks are too short for me so the kit fixed that as well as dressed her up.
And that triggers ugly ;)
If you're having to adjust the die that much, I would think you are using way too much powder.
Also, as far as the little marks from whatever you're using to "tong" them out. They really don't make any difference, except to your eyes.
Pics would help though ;)
Thanks Dale.
Everything else I read so far said that w/out a GC you lose accuracy ?
Might not matter at 1K fps ?
I'm gonna be trying to go at least twice that for the experiment though.
I could give it a go as is and once I see that I can get the speed I want, if the accuracy is waning, I...
Geez, it only took 20 yrs to figure that out. Pretty much anyone around here could have told them that... and for free :rolleyes:
**Sarcasm alert**
Wonder if that info will make it into a Bloomborg commercial :evil:
Yes, I'm sure some would argue that point.
But ALL the bearing surfaces are coated, including the not pictured, but all important bottom surface.
I'm far from there though. Got about a 50% success rate that time.
Partly do to user error.
So some of them went through part of the process...
That's exactly where my mind is at right now Venom.
Since all the rifle molds are GC, & PC negates the need for GC's.
The reading I've done so far indicates that w/out a GC the accuracy drops :(
So this would be next on the list.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.