Search results for query: *

A number of people that I know carry them, and they all love the Rukus. I want one myself, but its just too far out of my price range right now.

Sir, I don't have your training, but you are incorrect. The phrase "right of the people" can mean nothing else but exactly what it says. Look at the Federalist Papers and the words of the Founding Fathers. A dependent clause most certainly can be separated from an independent clause...

I agree. Those are definitely state issues, as long as the full faith and credit clause is not invoked to force other states to recognize homosexual marriage.

I will definitely agree with you on REAL ID, and on parts of the Patriot Act, but the rest is exactly part of what I would consider a traditional conservative. You will have to go a long way to convince me that a lot of what you call "Christian fundamentalist interest" would not have...

This really isn't the case. Tancredo, Hunter, Paul, and maybe Thompson (not convinced yet, but maybe) are traditional conservatives. The problem is that as a libertarian/liberal, you aren't looking for the same things that traditional conservatives represent, really. Some of them will overlap...

I'm not a fan of "neo-cons", although most people who use this term don't really know what it means, but you apparently really don't understand how many "Christian Conservatives" there are. If your goal is to kill the Republican party, the best way to do it is to kick us out. You don't have to...

Realgun, I thought it was pretty obvious that I was being sarcastic there, a joke in response to the post above. I guess that smiley there after the sentence didn't give enough of a clue?

That is very true. We are now gaining support with the left-wing loons:neener: Honestly, though, that is a great thing if it is really happening.

These are great knives. I have the modified drop point griptilian, and I love it.

I'm with Springmom and arthurcw on this. I understand the point, but it probably has a really limited audience for its intended message. I don't mind being called puritannical. Those of you who compare not liking the poster to wanting to control other people's lives are dead wrong. It...

I think that you are pretty much right on, but I don't understand this. Thomas being a more true originalist, I would think that he would like to see this case, unless he thought that it would lose.

Tecumseh, you do realize that Bob Jones is a private university, don't you? They have every right to have their own requirements for admission. You agree to those going in. If you don't like it there, you don't go (unless your parents are making you).

I have been a member in the past, but let it lapse. I need to rejoin. The part about the white supremacy groups is new, but everything else Pratt says I pretty much agree with.

You are right, I should not have said a large number, but it is suprising that anyone on a forum like this would be willing to give in at all.

Most of the threads and posts relating to the VT massacre have been right on target and of the type that I would expect from THR. I have also seen a number of posters who seem to invite some gun control in response to this situation rather than fight for our right to keep and bear arms. I...

lsb589, maybe I am misreading your post, but it sounds like you are arguing that we need to accept some gun control in order to prevent more gun control. This makes no sense whatsoever to me. If RKBA is real, it doesn't matter what crimes have been committed. There are inherent risks to...

That was my whole point. That is why I don't plan to vote for Giuliani, for instance. On the other hand, for some people 85-90% isn't adequate. It has to be 100% or nothing. If he stays in the race and has a chance to win, I reckon we'll just cancel each other out, then:)

Demanding complete and unvarying ideological purity is a great way to lose everything and still feel smug about it. I'm not going to vote for someone I totally disagree with, but I also realize that the only person who agrees with me on every issue is me.

Right, because we all know how completely fair and unbiased ABC, CBS, NBC, and CNN are. You all that consider it a trap do realize that the Congressional Black Caucus was teaming with Fox to hold this debate, don't you? Quite a bastion of hard-right conservatism there.

Your worldview is your morality. There is no form of morality that isn't based on "religion", so to speak, whether your religion believes in a God or not. Apparently, you just prefer a more humanistic worldview, as opposed to their Christian worldview. No problem with that, but it isn't quite...