Search results for query: *

Double tap, again........... 1/2 MOA is not in the same league as 1/5 MOA. z

Interesting, those that dislike Savages the most never owned, shot, researched, or held one. Brand loyal to the core, no matter what. Sounds like the Harley vs. Honda debate. z

Also here...... http://www.ihmsa.org/targets/index.html

Check this out.......should give you what you need http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metallic_silhouette

I would like to restock a Savage Mark II (.22 LR) with a stock suitable for the prone position. This Mark II shoots sub 0.4 MOA. At 50 M we are looking at under 0.2" groups. With a better stock, it might do better. I know, it's a cheap rifle.....but, it shoots well. What would be a good...

The CMP program is the best deal in town..........\ z

New 642-2 Put 150 assorted .38/.38+P rounds thru the 642-2. Operated perfectly and place all rounds in a nice 2" group at 21 feet. Recoil was not bad either, despite the many reports I read of sore hands after firing. No sore hands here! For its intended purpose, it proved to be a sweet...

More stubbies........... The S&W 625 .45ACP 3", Redhawk .44mag, 2 3/4". and a Colt .38 Sp. Diamondback 2 1/2". I had some very special snubbies, factory/custom creations, over the years but youth got the better of me. Should have kept them! z