Search results for query: *

That video is not the most powerful one, by Bill Whittle, about gun rights. No. That would be this one, 7 minutes long, from his "Virtual President" series, from 2 years ago. It includes the metaphor of the gazelle and the leopard: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_T-F_zfoDqI

This video came out today, it is part of the "Truth Revolt" series of videos. Bill Whittle discusses world wide gun ownership rates and crime rates. He destroys the progressive idea that more guns lead to higher crime rates, in 6 minutes: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pELwCqz2JfE

The original video at the beginning of this thread no longer plays (as somebody stated above). However, the video has been re-uploaded, a few hours ago: this time, the comments are disabled. It's the leftist way: don't engage your critics, SILENCE THEM if possible. Here is the new url...

http://www.mercurynews.com/crime-courts/ci_26292641/san-jose-rep-honda-announces-bill-ban-civilians

Yes, the word 'parody' does have the comedic implication, and that is problematic for this material. I think the best word might be 'rebuttal' (as suggested by theotherwaldo). I noticed that Alec Rawls uploaded this rebuttal video to his youtube channel not once, but twice. I'm not sure if...

"I have to disagree with the term parody." Okay. It does seem like the wrong word. I don't know the right word. I watched Alec Rawls' video first, before I watched the original (anti-gun) video. I thought Alec Rawls' video was powerful, and the imagery was just right. I thought: "this is a...

Here is the new parody video by Alec Rawls. It completely changes the meaning of the original video, simply by adding a few voice-over comments to the original video. I thought this parody effectively communicated a strong pro-defense message. Length: a minute and a half...

Jan Morgan is a nationally recognized 2nd Amendment Advocate/Speaker/ NRA Certified Firearms Instructor/ Associated Press Award winning investigative journalist/ Owner/Editor JanMorganMedia.com She wrote an article two days ago: "Guns & Ammo Editor Supports Gun Control in December Issue...

Thank you, that sounds right.

What if the teens really did deliberately run him off the road, in a manner that could reasonably be expected to cause serious injury or death? I don' t think that's what happened here, but what if it did? Would that then become the initial aggression in the legal sense?

Could somebody who knows that gun say, with certainty, whether the actor's finger is on the trigger?

Was the husband really the aggressor? The part that was not on the video, the "running off the road", can vary from careless driving all the way up to murder. We are assuming here that it was insignificant, more like careless driving, and that it therefore does not count as the initial...

That's right. Here is the official letter from Ronnie Barrett from February 20th, 2013: https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10152600613640038&set=a.370014790037.361087.269478890037&type=1

Yes, it does. Perhaps a prison term is what he deserves. Or have the judge order him to give some kind of lecture, once a week, for the rest of his life, on how a young life was ended because he was negligent, arrogant, and thought he could get away with ignoring a basic gun safety rule. Also...

What? Accidental discharge? What is that? Can you explain to me what an "accidental discharge" is, as opposed to a "negligent discharge"? My understanding is, this was an automatic "negligent discharge" from the moment he pulled the trigger (because of gross negligence, because he casually fired...