i went for the 19 for a slightly diff't reason. in my state, i can only have 10 round mags and the added size didn't make sense to me if i could not benefit from the mag capacity. now, as a range only gun, i'd probably go w/ a 34 and benefit from the added sight radius ;)
ahh -- the age old question -- I first started wondering about a 22lr conv kit back in the early 80's and the answer remains the same -- a resounding..."NO!" So, I ended up w/ a HK4 and shoot that as my HK 22lr :cool:
So, I've seen some great photos here -- and I've tried w/ my point & shoot to take pics of my stuff. But, I just can't seem to figure out the secret --
my question is -- what is the best way to photograph firearms?
I was taught a long time ago -- if it has to be explained, you'll never get it. When I first saw the P7M8, I knew I had to have one -- it does have its quirks, but it's still the most unique firearm I own :cool:
--maybe the bad photography will convince you to get one! ;)
The one time I tried it was the one time I woke up w/ a loaded pistol in my hand :eek: don't need to do that again -- and worse yet -- the possibility of waking up w/ an extra hole in my head...not good! :what: :scrutiny:
The few constants are "shot placement" and "get what fits your hand best" -- go w/ a caliber you can afford constantly and can put in the trigger time to get proficient and practice practice practice!
I own a few -- of them, my faves are: P7M8, BHP, 92fs and USP 9. I like each for slightly different reasons but if you're looking for a range gun, give a serious look to the USP.
Of the options you provide, I'd lean towards the 92fs ;)
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.