Search results for query: *

that's why if you are ever unfortunate enough to be involved in a similar situation, you best keep your mouth shut. the 5th was not intended to protect criminals, but to keep innocent people from being snared in a mistatement.

well, i'm with GEM. there is no room to comprimise when it comes to the right to defend ones life, or others from people that wish harm upon us. it's very simple you see, you either believe in the right of defending life, or you don't.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y70vcs3oV14

fixed it for ya;)

tax and gun friendly?............. take mid off of midwest and you'll be headed in a better direction.

no, but for all the other fundamental rights no one ever thought would be questioned. SCOTUS just heard oral arguments today in a case that is to decide wether or not "the people" have the RKBA, and your so confident that CCW will never come under fire?. that's not logic, that's just foolish.

breyer is a scumbag

wow, the solictor general just said that machine guns would be difficult to prove not protected under the 2nd. WOW.

kennedy just slapped ginsburg after trying to give dellinger a hand out.:neener:

:barf: Dellinger just made the case that because the states have been getting along lately, we have no need for a militia. this guy is toast.

Kennedy, Scalia, and Roberts, are hitting D.C. hard right now.:D

I gotta say that is quite an ignorant statement. I think you need proper history lessons.

i'm really scratching my head here, other than the club fed part, is this a true statement?.

God i love Montana!!!!!

please vote in this gun poll, half way down, left side of page. http://www.wgnradio.com/

i have been told that the local PD or sheriff can do it but some don't like to. my local PD told me to call local BATFE, and they would do it. my advise is that you should be very clear that it is a gun your considering purchasing and not one you own, and your not in anyway affiliated with...

yeah whatever. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5pcDA9sZES0&feature=related "I signed an assault weapons ban"

that would be outstanding!

glorious?, not really. since you assume my comment was only one dimensional, let me expound. my point being this; 1. can i as a voter assure safeguards against voter fraud?. 2. can i as a voter control the decisions of a lieing politician once in office?. 3. can i as a voter...

yeah that really seems to be working.......:banghead: