Search results for query: *

Seems the unfluted variety only comes in stainless... Share 'em if ya got 'em! Thanks!

- Yeah - they're mighty fine CZ clones (so I've read). But I'm a CZ fan and am familiar with them. How does the trigger pull/feel compare to the CZ-75. Also...'Hand Feel'....how do the grips compare between the two? I LOVE the 'like a glove' feel of my full size & compact CZ's...

Pretty cool lookin'! What is it??? Thanks!

- And how it compares ballistically to .380acp. Thanks!

Never seen it before....

I can't tell for sure: Thanks!

How can the RAMI & the Glock 30 both be dimensionally similar (height & width) yet both have the same capacity (10 for 9mm & 10 for .45acp). How did Glock do that? I'm ready to drop some coin on my next compact-ish gun. Looking at a RAMI & an Glock 30sf........which should I pick? And why?

- On a non-1911 platform? Maybe H&K??? Who? Thanks!

OK. This isn't my revolver.......but I wouldn't want to see this on my cylinder face. (the two dings on the face) Is something like this a big deal? I wonder how it happens?

OK. I'm not too much one to succumb to that which is a 'fad'......but I gotta admit - I like the 'extended barrel' look. In other words, an OEM pistol with a 4" barrel refitted with an aftermarket 4.5"-or-so barrel. Sometimes, these 'extended barrels' have compensation ports machined...

I can't find any info online about it let alone a PIC! Got a like to info or a pic to share? Thanks!

- OK.....I'd like a small BUG or gun that I can toss into a coat pocket/trousers etc (IN proper holster). In my mind, the 9mm PM9 has more advantages over the .38 642 .....but damn! I mean 2,786 posts appear to be fiercely loyal to the lil buggar...

I mean....it's a pretty damn popular firearm! And their design doesn't depend on barrel length. They have models for S&W J model and Taurus models.....why not the SP-101??? Your thoughts?

Both the shorter barrel models. I'd like to see a size comparison from multiple perspectives. Thanks!

Anyone own both? Couldja please take some pics of them side-by-side from a few different angles? I'm wondering if giving up my love for the Ruger and the power of the .357 is worth the more compact concealability (and less punch) of the 642. I invite your comments/thoughts as well...

So I'm on the Ruger website lookin' at these two beauties. They look VERY similar and are chambered similarly. What market/purpose is Ruger targeting? For what purpose would I profoundly say "Oh! For that you need the Vaquero....not the NMSBH!" Your take on this is appreciated!

I don't reload (....yet). And I'd like to pick up a .41mag - but what's the going rate for various loads?

See it here: http://www.galleryofguns.com/Genie/Default.aspx?item=1740&mfg=Ruger&mdl=GP100&cat=1&type=Revolver&cal=357&fin=All&sit=All I'd REALLLY like to know! Full shroud or short shroud? Thanks!

- Anyone? Thanks!

OK. Obviously, it's a big bore somethin'. I don't see a barrel band so that rules out most leverguns. Barrel appears to be a shorter 'carbine length'. Any guesses???